Search content
Sort by
Showing 14 of 14 results by Thor78
Does anyone have this problem?
-================================================================Č
Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v12.2 Beta
L================================================================-
ZEC: 6 pools are specified
Main ZCash pool is zec.suprnova.cc:2242
AMD OpenCL platform not found
No AMD OPENCLGPUs found, exit
-================================================================Č
Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v12.2 Beta
L================================================================-
ZEC: 6 pools are specified
Main ZCash pool is zec.suprnova.cc:2242
AMD OpenCL platform not found
No AMD OPENCLGPUs found, exit
Already solved
Does anyone have this problem?
-================================================================Č
Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v12.2 Beta
L================================================================-
ZEC: 6 pools are specified
Main ZCash pool is zec.suprnova.cc:2242
AMD OpenCL platform not found
No AMD OPENCLGPUs found, exit
-================================================================Č
Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v12.2 Beta
L================================================================-
ZEC: 6 pools are specified
Main ZCash pool is zec.suprnova.cc:2242
AMD OpenCL platform not found
No AMD OPENCLGPUs found, exit
I hope there is someone who can explane this. I always mine with CM, but aprox two weeks ago someone mention that optiminer is faster and I said I will try it.
I have eight R9 280x and with CM 11.1 I have 2000H/s, I mine aprox 0.12 - 0.15 ZEC per day (24h). I mine on suprnova.
Then I change miner to OPTI 1.6. I have 2200H/s and mine aprox 0.2 ZEC per day. I use OPTI about 10 days and everx day I mine aprox 0.2 ZEC per day.
Two days ago I change miner to CM 12, I have 2270H/s and I mine 0.12 ZEC in 24 hours.
So I change miner back to OPTI 1.62 now and I have 2200H/s and I mine 0.26 ZEC in last 24 hours.
So, is there someone who can explane this?
I have eight R9 280x and with CM 11.1 I have 2000H/s, I mine aprox 0.12 - 0.15 ZEC per day (24h). I mine on suprnova.
Then I change miner to OPTI 1.6. I have 2200H/s and mine aprox 0.2 ZEC per day. I use OPTI about 10 days and everx day I mine aprox 0.2 ZEC per day.
Two days ago I change miner to CM 12, I have 2270H/s and I mine 0.12 ZEC in 24 hours.
So I change miner back to OPTI 1.62 now and I have 2200H/s and I mine 0.26 ZEC in last 24 hours.
So, is there someone who can explane this?
http://i68.tinypic.com/2rrlc04.jpg
My MSI RX480 4Gb cant run at I8 on 11.1. Using 16.12.2
Anyone get the same problem?
My MSI RX480 4Gb cant run at I8 on 11.1. Using 16.12.2
Anyone get the same problem?
I get the same problem, Im using radeon-crimson-16.4.2 on R9 280x
Does anybody run these miner on win 10?
Yep, i using win 10
Are they the same performance as win 7?
after reinstalling OS win7 my miner sees only 4 of 6 gpus.
Why?
Can anybody help me?
Why?
Can anybody help me?
Did you use the 6 gpu mod?
now i'd like to use win 7_64 - problems - only 4 cards (i have 6). After updating drivers - no cards.
miner does not start at all:
There is no openGL...
the problems dissapeared for good. The next thing is to use windows 8.1 64 bit, especialli if you have h81 mobo. They are really well optimised for this OS. Moreover, windows 10 will have bigger load on the cpu which can slow your cards when mining. In my case win 10 is above 90% whereas win 8.1 around 20%.
You should see 6 cards after the drivers install and 1 probably with an exclamation mark in the device manager. You need to run the 6 card mod to be able to mine with all 6.
http://www.gobitgo.com/articles/1001/How-To-Correctly-Use-and-Install-PCI-E-Riser-Cables/
I just tried dwarfpool mined for two hours
Earned nothing?
Here's my bat file
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -zpsw x -wd 1 -r 0 -i 6
I appeared to connect just fine and I saw my accurate hash rate displayed along with shares found ...but no earnings?
Earned nothing?
Here's my bat file
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -zpsw x -wd 1 -r 0 -i 6
I appeared to connect just fine and I saw my accurate hash rate displayed along with shares found ...but no earnings?
same here, no earnings a looot of time
Pool didn't find any block last 8 hours, u get paid when pool finds a new block.
Do you have any Idea what the average time it takes to find a block?
In a 42 Msol/s network Dwarfpool needs almost 2 hours to find a block (average).
Tested Dwarfpool........ no good, I get about 50% coins more on suprnova.
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
Not much difference....
GPU0 and GPU2 on risers = 290s, GPU1 in PCI slot = 290x. All 3 x GPUs are modded with Stilt ROM.
Claymore v8, -i 6, W10, Celeron 1840 on ASrock H81 Pro BTC, 8GB RAM, 24-34GB Windows Virtual Memory.
=====
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
GPU0 t=78C fan=99%, GPU1 t=80C fan=99%, GPU2 t=77C fan=99%
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:02 - New job from cn1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 810.672 H/s, Total Shares: 78457, Rejected: 32, Time: 73:43
ZEC: GPU0 267.759 H/s, GPU1 280.460 H/s, GPU2 262.452 H/s
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (79 ms)!
=====
The 290X speed is 280 while the 290 speed is 264. So that is about 6% differece. If the frequency is the same, that is still some increase.
I have way more rejected shares
Why fans all 99% ?
I bought them used for a test rig. The 290s are notorious for being loud and hot.
So -fanmax 99 is better than an overheated GPU, you can always replace fans....
I have seven 280x, I take down the originals fans and put on fans that I buy on the web, I think the price was about 1.3 eur for one fan, I put 3 fans per card. Supply for that fans I take directly 12V so they are always on 100%. When they starts slowing down, I just take some silicon oil in spray and they run like new. Beacuse they always run on 100%, my cards run cooler.
Link to fans http:http://www.banggood.com/3-Pin-80mm-15mm-PC-CPU-Cooling-Fan-Heatsink-Cooler-Radiator-For-Computer-12V-p-997476.html
is anyone using a R9 290 non-x and R9 290x together?
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
What is the difference in hasing power between them at roughly same GPU and mem clocks?
Thanxx.
Not much difference....
GPU0 and GPU2 on risers = 290s, GPU1 in PCI slot = 290x. All 3 x GPUs are modded with Stilt ROM.
Claymore v8, -i 6, W10, Celeron 1840 on ASrock H81 Pro BTC, 8GB RAM, 24-34GB Windows Virtual Memory.
=====
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:49 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
GPU0 t=78C fan=99%, GPU1 t=80C fan=99%, GPU2 t=77C fan=99%
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:13:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:02 - New job from cn1-zcash.flypool.org:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 810.672 H/s, Total Shares: 78457, Rejected: 32, Time: 73:43
ZEC: GPU0 267.759 H/s, GPU1 280.460 H/s, GPU2 262.452 H/s
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:07 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (78 ms)!
ZEC: 11/28/16-03:14:10 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (79 ms)!
=====
The 290X speed is 280 while the 290 speed is 264. So that is about 6% differece. If the frequency is the same, that is still some increase.
I have way more rejected shares
Why fans all 99% ?
I bought them used for a test rig. The 290s are notorious for being loud and hot.
So -fanmax 99 is better than an overheated GPU, you can always replace fans....
I have seven 280x, I take down the originals fans and put on fans that I buy on the web, I think the price was about 1.3 eur for one fan, I put 3 fans per card. Supply for that fans I take directly 12V so they are always on 100%. When they starts slowing down, I just take some silicon oil in spray and they run like new. Beacuse they always run on 100%, my cards run cooler.
I see some posts that V8 reached hardware limits and there is no way to improve speed anymore. It's not true.
I'm working on new version with another good speedup, though it takes more time and efforts.
I'm working on new version with another good speedup, though it takes more time and efforts.
And whats the point?? High temperatures, more electricity and same profit, cuz all are with the new miner. Your new versions are not helpful, do you know that?
My miner does not support Linux, Nvidia, CPUs. They will not get any speedups from my miner.
Though I'm ready to stop development if most of people think so. It's not a problem for me at all. Make a vote somewhere to see results.
I hope there will be a few more new releases. If there is someone who dont like that, just dont use the latest version also you can use older versions.
Good work Claymore, hope new version will be released soon.
After the v8, both of my r9 280x have died. Be carefull.
I have seven r9 280x, everything works fine, temps are betwen 50 and 60.
I dont belive there is somthing wrong with v8.
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v7.3 (Windows/Linux)
This thread turned from Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v7.3 (Windows/Linux) to genoil ZEC miner thread 
Make no mistake, we all waiting for Claymore's ZEC miner. Just sharing infos about drivers, cards, Sol/s etc...