I think you are having a serious emotional reaction.
Let's have a look at your complaints.
1) amount of tokens to be issued, cost per token, or the amount of money you are hoping to raise:
>> This is very common with announcements. The detail likely comes sooner to the event itself.
2) You don't even need crypto or blockchain technology to do this, people could just prepay with fiat
>>> It's in the Whitepaper FAQ. I skimmed and found it. Blockchain is primarily for privacy and stops the person from who delivers the service from knowing the identity of the contact holder in advance. That makes sense.
3) your Singapore registration
What's wrong with Singapore? Have you read the IRS revenue recognition issues that are driving companies into the Swiss Tezos situation ?
4) your long disclaimer section
Needed as part of SEC rules to allow qualified investors. I just read 5 more ICO white papers today, the the non-Soviet ones have them.
5) But you DO collect (the information), or at least intend to
That's because Singapore, the USA and other developed economies have KYC in place. It's required for anti-money laundering, and only for the ICO section.
Once the tokens are bought, I imagine it's wide open. Anyone can buy contracts and the platform doesn't record the information. There's no reason for the token sale and platform identities to be linked, so I think it's a false assumption.
Also they probably outsource the KYC information to Civic or someone similar, so they may never ever see it. With the privacy background of the people involved, that's 95% what I imagine ill happen.
6) G-Man?
I doubt it. Probably very anti-G-Man