Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 308 results by Tortoise75
Re: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ DigiSync v6.14.2 - DigiSpeed - Segwit -DiguSign
why dgb can be sent to non-existent wallet? You can also make some kind of protection
That would be difficult. It would need a new type of entry in the blocks and every wallet would need to send their created addresses for registering there. Then every wallet would need to build a database with all addresses, which would bloat the wallet by quite a bit, and scan this database for every transaction for the receiving address, at least for not recently used ones. It'd still slow down doing a transaction but at least be a lot quicker than rescanning the whole blockchain for the receiving address. Plus you couldn't just give out, or use for own purposes, an address of a cold wallet because the address generating wallet must be online, or the address imported into one, before an address can be used for receiving funds.Anyway, it's not much different for bank transactions. While that shouldn't work for non existing IBANs it's a lot more likely to wrongly insert an existing one there and if that happens the funds are gone, no matter if by typo or fraud, if the wrong receiver is not nice enough to send them back. Banks could reverse those transactions, they do if it's their fault, but if they don't have to pay for a mistake then it's your bad luck and problem and the transaction final.
Re: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ DigiSync v6.14.2 - DigiSpeed - Segwit -DiguSign
why dgb can be sent to non-existent wallet? You can also make some kind of protection
That would be difficult. It would need a new type of entry in the blocks and every wallet would need to send their created addresses for registering there. Then every wallet would need to build a database with all addresses, which would bloat the wallet by quite a bit, and scan this database for every transaction for the receiving address, at least for not recently used ones. It'd still slow down doing a transaction but at least be a lot quicker than rescanning the whole blockchain for the receiving address. Plus you couldn't just give out, or use for own purposes, an address of a cold wallet because the address generating wallet must be online, or the address imported into one, before an address can be used for receiving funds.Anyway, it's not much different for bank transactions. While that shouldn't work for non existing IBANs it's a lot more likely to wrongly insert an existing one there and if that happens the funds are gone, no matter if by typo or fraud, if the wrong receiver is not nice enough to send them back. Banks could reverse those transactions, they do if it's their fault, but if they don't have to pay for a mistake then it's your bad luck and problem and the transaction final.
Re: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ DigiSync v6.14.2 - DigiSpeed - Segwit -DiguSign
Hi friends,
I have issue with my wallet on MacBook.
On 21 May, 2017 i bought $40.00 worth of DGB when price was 0.016 from Poloniex and install the wallet from their official website to my MacBook, i go to request payment and copy the receive address and paste it to poloniex and then send my coins from poloniex to my wallet address. I never was able to see my coins on my wallet because when i first download the wallet and installed it i have no idea how to use it and how to add peers and etc and wallet says me i need years to synchronize with the headers and network and i decided to close the wallet and create a folder with DGB wallet folders on my PC (when first launched the wallet it created several folders and iam keeping them on PC) after a month or two i tried again to launch the wallet to but i was again unable to run it because it said the same thing that it cannot synchronize with headers and network it again created some folders on my PC but this time i deleted them and decided to close the wallet and never again try because i was pissed.
Yesterday i read a little on the net and understand how to speed up the process of synchronizing and my wallet is now up to date with the network after several hours of waiting but iam unable to see my coins on my wallet.
I think that the coins are on the folders which i firstly installed the wallet and get the receiving address from it and send coins from poloniex.
Because at the moment when i go to receiving address history i am unable to see the address where i send the coins from poloniex.
I go to poloniex and check my receiving address on: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgb/ and coins are received on the address but iam unable to see my coins on my current wallet.
My question is if it is possible to import anyway the old DGB folders to my current wallet and recover my coins anyway? If someone can help me to recover my coins iam willing to send him some coins.
Please help me to recover my coins.
Thank you
I have issue with my wallet on MacBook.
On 21 May, 2017 i bought $40.00 worth of DGB when price was 0.016 from Poloniex and install the wallet from their official website to my MacBook, i go to request payment and copy the receive address and paste it to poloniex and then send my coins from poloniex to my wallet address. I never was able to see my coins on my wallet because when i first download the wallet and installed it i have no idea how to use it and how to add peers and etc and wallet says me i need years to synchronize with the headers and network and i decided to close the wallet and create a folder with DGB wallet folders on my PC (when first launched the wallet it created several folders and iam keeping them on PC) after a month or two i tried again to launch the wallet to but i was again unable to run it because it said the same thing that it cannot synchronize with headers and network it again created some folders on my PC but this time i deleted them and decided to close the wallet and never again try because i was pissed.
Yesterday i read a little on the net and understand how to speed up the process of synchronizing and my wallet is now up to date with the network after several hours of waiting but iam unable to see my coins on my wallet.
I think that the coins are on the folders which i firstly installed the wallet and get the receiving address from it and send coins from poloniex.
Because at the moment when i go to receiving address history i am unable to see the address where i send the coins from poloniex.
I go to poloniex and check my receiving address on: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgb/ and coins are received on the address but iam unable to see my coins on my current wallet.
My question is if it is possible to import anyway the old DGB folders to my current wallet and recover my coins anyway? If someone can help me to recover my coins iam willing to send him some coins.
Please help me to recover my coins.
Thank you
Did you save a backup of your wallet file after creating addresses. In the folder is there a file called wallet.dat? That is the file that contains your private keys. If you have that and are running Windows close down the wallet by right clicking the icon in the icon try and saying exit or close. Then put the wallet.dat file in C:\Users\YOURUSER\AppData\Roaming\DigiByte. Of course, change YOURUSER to whatever your user data folder in Windows is (you need to make hidden files and folders visible). Backup the current wallet.dat file first. Then you should be able to see your old addresses. If you don't have the wallet.dat file from appdata roaming or a backup of the wallet file there is nothing you can do to get the coins.
I didn't saved backup of my wallet never
. Because of i have issue's with launching digibyte i closed the wallet and deleted all files wallet created but today i found that all files are on my Trash on Mac and i found several wallet.dat files. I replaced each of them with wallet.dat on current working wallet folder but i go to "Receiving addressess" each time and never seen the address which is on my Poloniex account history. I want to know if the address which i can see on poloniex history should be on my receiving addressess on my wallet? Because iam searching for it. Can someone help me to recover my coins? Do i need another folder also so i can recover the coins? I have all old folders which i recover from my trash to desktop and iam checking but unable to find anything . Please help.If you can't find that address, or you can't restore the Mac wallet, you can try generating new addresses using the Mac wallet.dat in the hope it comes up again. I don't know if the pregenerated address pool is stored in the wallet.dat, though, and I'm not sure how many addresses the DGB wallet creates as standard but if it's not in the first 100 addresses it's probably unlikely to come up after that. To avoid manually checking all those addresses you could just generate the lot and do the dumpprivkey again, if you get a key you've got it.
Re: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ DigiSync v6.14.2 - DigiSpeed - Segwit -DiguSign
Can still play some games and win digibyte? Or is digibytegaming.com no longer available?
It's no longer available, the API of the games allowed people to cheat to add fake playtime and achievements to get DGB without playing.Anybody see anything kind of odd when we arrange the trade volume once more... seems to be an entire digit missing!
https://imgur.com/a/1V8rU
Yes, DGB hits quite a lot of trading volume for its market cap. Makes it look undervalued from this side, too, and also means that quite a, comparatively, high percentage of the coins are actively traded and in circulation.https://imgur.com/a/1V8rU
Re: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ DigiSync v6.14.2 - DigiSpeed - Segwit -DiguSign
So let me get this straight. Theres a bunch of people investing in specialized hardware to support and secure this network efficiently and you all want to punish them by switching mining algo's? They believe in DGB and want to accumulate as much as they can through mining, somehow there's a problem with it? It's called competition.
Yes, I can agree with switching out dead algo's such as qubit.
Yes, I can agree with switching out dead algo's such as qubit.
they will still be asic algo but now if we do nothing they will be no cpu&gpu algo anymore onyl asic
and you think it s fair when someone is doing close to 1 million dgb a day and probably dumping it everyday?
They are actively investing in the network. Swap the shitty qubit algo for a better cpu algo and leave the rest alone. No need to force the miners out so people can get their easy coins. If that happens, the network will be less secure and less valued overall.
To a certain extent I have to agree. Fighting asics is like fighting against the natural progression of technology, which is weird, especially for new tech like crypto.
Would Bitcoin have grown as much as it has if everyone still used massive GPU farms, sucking down electricity like the proverbial? Lower costs of mining mean fewer coins need to be dumped to pay for it, which is a good thing.
How is it better that it's now even more massive ASIC miner farms sucking down electricity like the proverbial? The individual machine may be hugely more efficient but since the gains are limited and controlled by the difficulty the whole thing is still mostly based on costs of electricity vs value of the mined coins as long as enough hardware is available. If the hardware is not available in those numbers, from several manufacturers in a variety of markets, it's a risk for the security of the blockchain, which is actually a concern lasting on Bitcoin for quite some while now and it still didn't cut down electricity use, not enough to stop all the 'Madness! Electricity enough to power cities wasted to generate useless electronic currency' stuff in the mainstream press at least, which, along that it's otherwise mostly only mentioned together with ransomware and other criminal activities, doesn't exactly help it's image.
Re: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ DigiSync v6.14.2 - DigiSpeed - Segwit -DiguSign
Digibyte is on the bottom now, if you see at the price chart, price is on the same level where it was before the spring pump. Digibyte will start new race from this level
maybe hard to say if btc keep going so fast up
but for now look like it won't go below 100sat
and if there are to much new ASICs and they dump all the dgb's than maybe it could go below 100
if i remember someone post here 1 miner with new ASICs was doing 20000+ dgb a day! if more are coming
it just gonna kill the price
don't know if difficulty will adjust correctly and or gpu miners leave
i hope the team is working on the algo switch and won't forget to add hdd burst mining to it
is there somewhere when we can see the chart of the 5 algos ?
Yes, the devs are working on algo switch, it is also announced on roadamap.
Source please?
I did read something similar on Reddit (with a 2 month time frame). But if miners dumping this coin is really true, that's bad news. Isn't there a difficulty adjustment to prevent this from happening?
However, I believe it would be against the ethos of DigiByte not to keep at least one algorithm open for conventional hardware. This is commonly accepted as the most decentralised part of a network!
In truth, I think it is just a fair place for common folk to get involved in the mining process and really support the project. Most GPU miners will be mining in a pool and this kind of centralises their efforts. A high proportion of solo miners would be the most decentralised our network could be.
If a DigiByte algorithm could be mined only with solo machines, with a power cap of say 2 top spec GPUs. I think we would really be on the way to reinforcing the most decentralised network claim.
Maybe there could even be ways of weighting this new algo against the rest of the network, increasing its luck so that it started to take more than 20% as the number of participants increased, for example.
The rewards are going to be few and far between but much bigger when they come and this seriously would be Hardcore DigiByter territory, Im thinking.
The professional mining race will continue within the remaining ASIC algorithms and eventually assuming equipment becomes better distributed within the community, overall security of DigiByte could be seriously increased by the efficiency of these machines mining on our network.
Instead of the overall network running away in power consumption, the competing ASIC miners become more self regulating but are ultimately kept in check by the size of the GPU participation.
Its all a bit sketchy perhaps but Im flying by the seat of my pants here!
The hashrate capped solo mining only (the power cap should have this result anyway) idea is interesting. One problem I see is that with that many individual miners the time in between blocks found by each individual miner might become too long quickly which contradicts the goal of having more participants. Maybe introduce some kind of mini-block which would be nothing more than a mineable, perhaps at a tenth of the real difficulty, transaction with a reward attached to it to reward providing hashrate to the network more regularly. At the same time this could provide the reward bonus of this more decentralized algo.
Of course I'm also just brainstorming here, but with more inputs this could turn out as a viable concept. :-)
Re: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ DigiSync v6.14.2 - DigiSpeed - Segwit -DiguSign
Digibyte is on the bottom now, if you see at the price chart, price is on the same level where it was before the spring pump. Digibyte will start new race from this level
maybe hard to say if btc keep going so fast up
but for now look like it won't go below 100sat
and if there are to much new ASICs and they dump all the dgb's than maybe it could go below 100
if i remember someone post here 1 miner with new ASICs was doing 20000+ dgb a day! if more are coming
it just gonna kill the price
don't know if difficulty will adjust correctly and or gpu miners leave
i hope the team is working on the algo switch and won't forget to add hdd burst mining to it
is there somewhere when we can see the chart of the 5 algos ?
Yes, the devs are working on algo switch, it is also announced on roadamap.
Source please?
I did read something similar on Reddit (with a 2 month time frame). But if miners dumping this coin is really true, that's bad news. Isn't there a difficulty adjustment to prevent this from happening?
It's a bit of a problem. 1.337% sounds a bit low, the real APR would be higher because of compounding, and 13.37% sounds about good but generates a lot of new coins, too many quite probably. Maybe a compromise. Go for 1.337% but add a fixed block reward of 133.7 on top. With the current weight it should roughly double the rewards of an APR of 1.337%. With more weight/coins on the network the rewards would be less because your amount of coins would stake less blocks and only the APR half calculates the higher coin age into the rewards. Causes the lowered APR that less people or coins are staking the reward raises due to more blocks staked the fixed amount becomes dominant, plus some compounding effects on the APR part.
Just some heads up about something I found mentioned in another coins thread, don't know if it was mentioned here already. Looks like that someone in Top Airportparking likes MaxCoin as well because it's listed among the accepted coins. Glad to see this since I have a soft spot for this coin as well, one of the first coins I own and mined. Good to see MaxCoin is still Alive and Kickin'.
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/105258-2/
https://www.airportparking.top
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/105258-2/
https://www.airportparking.top
Re: [BRK] Breakout Chain | Coin Sale Complete | Multicurrencies | Gaming + eSports
Noticed in another coins thread that Top Airportparking, as the name says a company with parking lots near airports and cruise line ports, is accepting crypto as well. Browsing through the list of coins accepted I see that Breakout is among them. Nice thing, I think, and if traveling by plane to some real life poker event and wondering where to park the car it might be something to consider now. 
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/105258-2/
https://www.airportparking.top
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/105258-2/
https://www.airportparking.top
Hi Dev,
Is it normal to have a ~14% CPU's permanently usage for run the wallet?
Is it normal to have a ~14% CPU's permanently usage for run the wallet?
Hi, it really depends on what your wallet is doing. If its behind and actively syncing then you could see some CPU usage but if you are all synced and in normal state, CPU usage should be pretty low as you can see in the screenshot below...this is my wallet currently at normal state which is only using 0.5%.
Strange, but I have the same problem ~15% used and the only think I do is stacking...
EDIT: Also I have invested like $15 and for the 3 days I got my first mined coins (calculated I will make $0.27 for full year) is my math off or this is normal with such small amount?
Everyone, it seems like Cryptopia wallet is back online but do not transfer or withdraw all your coins before verifying that it works with small amount first. I would recommend you to verify with 1 coin first and make sure you receive on the other end. I am still trying to confirm that everything is working fine. Stay tuned.
Thanks for the update on Cryptopia xenonflux as I have been waiting on them for a while now. I'll do what you say and just try a small withdrawal and see what happens. As I'm not at home yet, I'll try later and hopefully have time to post an update in here to let everyone know unless someone beats me to it lol.
Hi Vella, Cryptopia withdrawal seems to be working fine as i was able to verify their minimum withdrawal of 20k this morning but the deposit to Cryptopia wallet address is still not working.
This Thread is discontinued. The new ANN-Thread with updated information and roadmap is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2249640.0
I would like to know what the 1337% yearly I am interested in
Currently it's 20.89%.Wallet stuck at block 1083382 (07.10.2017 15:18:52). Should i delete everything and resync wallet or will it catch them ?
Got connections, wallet says stacking XD
It might catch itself but if it's still stuck then downloading the chain snapshot (1337-snapshot10082017.zip at the time of this post) from https://github.com/xenonflux/1337/releases and replace your files with it (you don't have to replace the conf if you have working custom one) would be way faster. If you have the room on your harddrive(s) then keeping a copy of those files gives you your own fallback option btw., especially useful for coins without such good support as 1337 gets from devs and community. Got connections, wallet says stacking XDI sent some coins to Cryptopia from my 1.8 wallet before I knew that their wallet was in maintenance updating to 1.9. What is going to happen to those coins?? Will they show up when they get their wallet updated or are they going to be lost because they will be on 1.9 and I sent them from 1.8??
Not being able to send from 1.8 to 1.9 and vice versa usually means that the TX is incompatible and if it was sent after the official chain forked it won't be included into the 1.9 version of the blockchain. So check how many coins you should have including those sent ones and once your wallet is up to date, synced and still missing those coins look for that TX in your transaction list. It should be sitting there with 0 confirmations, if that's the case go to the console and do a repairwallet which should give you your coins back. If it actually managed to get confirmed, like if sent before the fork happened, check Cryptopia, the coins should be there once they are synced up.Re: Omicron - Dividend-Issuing Currency - Sixth dividends issued: 437 sats/OMC
Hello,
please help. I have OMC Omicron on Yobit.
What should I do?Where can I swap to ETH based Token?
Thank you
Monaw
Edit:
Yes, I will definitely make a guide on how to do it. I need 1-2 weeks of planning before I proceed with anything. The planning process includes the release of a short-term roadmap, with the swap commencing shortly after that. Once all that is done, my sole objective would be a replenishment of the fund, to the point where A. Dividends can continue, even on a minimal basis, or B. A buy-back of Omicron. If we proceeded with a buy-back, it would be quite lower than the BTC value of the ICO price, but should be more or less similar to the USD value at the time, considering the fact I would be using whatever garnered funds remaining along with a bit of money from my pocket. But that is ahead of us at the moment, and the main focus to deploy on a proper system to get the ball rolling again. All decisions will be held by community vote as the investors are the voice of this project. More details to come soon.
Where I can find the short-term Roadmap?
Thank you
Monaw
No worries, it's not published yet. It will in due time.please help. I have OMC Omicron on Yobit.
What should I do?Where can I swap to ETH based Token?
Thank you
Monaw
Edit:
Yes, I will definitely make a guide on how to do it. I need 1-2 weeks of planning before I proceed with anything. The planning process includes the release of a short-term roadmap, with the swap commencing shortly after that. Once all that is done, my sole objective would be a replenishment of the fund, to the point where A. Dividends can continue, even on a minimal basis, or B. A buy-back of Omicron. If we proceeded with a buy-back, it would be quite lower than the BTC value of the ICO price, but should be more or less similar to the USD value at the time, considering the fact I would be using whatever garnered funds remaining along with a bit of money from my pocket. But that is ahead of us at the moment, and the main focus to deploy on a proper system to get the ball rolling again. All decisions will be held by community vote as the investors are the voice of this project. More details to come soon.
Where I can find the short-term Roadmap?
Thank you
Monaw
From slack answering a question for news:
Quote from: gladimor@slack
Not yet, I will organize the distribution soon. In other news, I have come into contact with 1 developer, he's working on a project at the moment but hopefully will be able to divert efforts towards the new coin.
I have not discussed any few features and such w/ you guys, I will once I have made certain of the extent of capabilities of the team.
I have not discussed any few features and such w/ you guys, I will once I have made certain of the extent of capabilities of the team.
In the meantime anyone with coins in a wallet/node give it a try getting it online. The chain actually managed to move for a day earlier this month and if even if it only goes somewhat erratically it can make things easier, besides possibly some staked extra coins.
Re: [BRK] Breakout Chain | Coin Sale Complete | Multicurrencies | Gaming + eSports
Sorry about that, wrong thread.
But I've got some connections here too:
addnode=susixmc72pftjdyk.onion:11698
addnode=p3kyrencpgsnuymd.onion:11698
addnode=ylkmrztr3xfe6jfj.onion:11698
addnode=ndy7ut4zqb46ugsk.onion:11698
addnode=72pub5js4nw3g3np.onion:11698
But I've got some connections here too:
addnode=susixmc72pftjdyk.onion:11698
addnode=p3kyrencpgsnuymd.onion:11698
addnode=ylkmrztr3xfe6jfj.onion:11698
addnode=ndy7ut4zqb46ugsk.onion:11698
addnode=72pub5js4nw3g3np.onion:11698
Re: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ DigiSync v6.14.2 - DigiSpeed - Segwit -DiguSign
If the digibyte market gets up and running again you could offer them there for digibytes
I don't know if a centralized digibyte market was the best idea. I think the best thing to do is get a to have merchants accepting it on their own terms.
terms.
Also, I will sell the stickers at cost, which should be VERY low. I need to find a good company that produces and ships stickers first
But for now lets see the rebranding and with it the chosen path for the near future.
Re: [BRK] Breakout Chain | Coin Sale Complete | Multicurrencies | Gaming + eSports
How is it possible they made the gaming/gambling website and it doesn't accept BRK tokens?
Wasn't the whole point that it's decentralized? This seems like a huge scam.
I visited https://sports.breakoutgaming.com/#/casino and the games are running but all deposit options are FIAT. No crypto whatsoever. So people bought BRK tokens for no reason?
There was word that their gambling license only allows for FIAT so far. A license including Crypto is tried to be acquired but I haven't heard any news on that for some time. Also I don't know if the converting deposited FIAT funds on their sites to BRK is still a thing. For now some marketing and work on stuff outside the actual wallet and base blockchain tech is done by the team and that's more than can be said for most coins, so I give BRK time to proof itself. I'm in no hurry with this (small) investment.Wasn't the whole point that it's decentralized? This seems like a huge scam.
I visited https://sports.breakoutgaming.com/#/casino and the games are running but all deposit options are FIAT. No crypto whatsoever. So people bought BRK tokens for no reason?