I'm keeping the WAVES sig btw, not interested in getting free RISE and not investing into that project. WAVES (just as ETH did) will offer something unique and needed in a decentralized fashion (unlike Ripple).
RISE is just riding the DAPPS hype with a LISK clone and Alty as a project manager. I would advise caution.
But Waves also just a CLONE.... I mean if you are talking about unique then Waves doesn't apply here. This is not code that was written from 0%. RISE can maybe be a ride of from LISK, and there will some coins following for sure, but if every clone of LISK will give only half of the profit then what LISK is giving then i'll be in all of those clones
I bet you either don't know what "clone" means, or are here just to be annoying.
Does anyone know about a Wallet for Waves, especially a light one? Here they mention Waves is going to be integrated into the new Mycellium wallet but I think that is later in the year. https://news.bitcoin.com/interview-rassah-mycelium/
It's not a problem. You can send from an exchange.
That's why we are using Coinbase as the first part of our investment system because it's very good at handling multiple inputs. After that the btc is automatically forwarded to the electrum multisig address every 15 minutes and until there is 0.5 btc min.
good choice. Thanks
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [PRE-ANN][RISE] Rise | ICO STARTED 25% BONUS | FULL ESCROW | AFFILIATE PROGRAM
by
Tosch
on 10/05/2016, 11:33:41 UTC
It would not be a problem sending from exchange?
Post
Topic
BoardAltcoin Discussion
Re: Charlie Lee on Twitter: “I, Charlie Lee, am the creator of Litecoin”
Like the initial design Im sure it will be improved by leaps and bounds on launch. However I was curious as to why tables were used is some sections when it could have been done in CSS.
We are about to set things up, please do not consider anything as "final". Sometimes you will see new approaches already in github branches, sometimes we are just throwing API and the info on the page so that another coder can take up and integrate into a better design. We are working with a team on this. Sometimes it might still be playing around with ideas. As long as we do not advertise it as "Beta" it should not be used for anything more than having a look where the current development process is. But nearly everything but design will change down the road from what you see now The API is still in progress, sometimes you might also see a workaround until the API is finally there. Most importantly we are working to integrate nearly every API call into JavaScript natively, so just necessary information will be taken from API such as price sheets, balances etc.
You can do asset-asset trading(like real trading, not conversion) and create asset, crowdfund your project with fiat tokens there ? lol from when ?
Also can you issue loyalty tokens and pay fees in that token also ?
Do they have reputation system for this also ?
Are they using unique tech solving probably blockchain bloat problem ?
Asset to asset or coin to coin trading will also be possible in Nxt at the end of the year with Nxt 2.0 ( the inspiration for Waves). Why is Waves better in this?
Waves will be platform with emphasis on custom token creation, transfer and decentralized trading, with deep fiat integration, focus on crowdfunding, community-backed projects and mass adoption.
Fiat assets will be backed by third-parties, payment systems, and banks. Fiat tokens on Waves blockchain will be right at launch.
One of the goals will be also to create a protocol for token/asset transfer between blockchains. Imagine you have a token on NXT, ETH platform and would like to move this token to BTC colored coins or Waves blockchain. Assets issued on existing blokchains will be able to be transferred if protocol is implemented on both sides and you can enjoy then features of many blockchains at the same time.
Yes, but you will need more third parties for that. Can I say Waves is the more centralized version on Nxt (not ment to be negative).
From my point of view, Nxt is one of the most decentralized scenario possible. Anonymous ICO and development. Built up with no (or not much) legal applicatiotion and real businesses. I think Nxt is for everybody that wants to use the Blockchain for something (data cloud, marketplace, voting system, monetary system, assets...). You have everything at once. While when you concentrate your Blockchain on Assets, you can have a Blockchain that can be slim and fast, because it does not have to deal with all the other data on it.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Nxt :: descendant of Bitcoin
by
Tosch
on 04/04/2016, 12:29:09 UTC
Help me creating a developer friendly environment with Nxt NRS and crypto tools. Chime in into Nxt development with the NxtDevKit. Easy to setup and use for development with Nxt and Javascript:
Hello! I am just checking in here. I am working on the Waves Client and am helping to prepare the testnet right now. FYI, the current setup will use the implementation from kushti, which is called Scorex ( https://github.com/ScorexProject/scorex ) and on top of that Lagonaki ( https://github.com/ScorexProject/Lagonaki ). Lagonaki uses the so called "permacoin-consensus". The Waves testnet will have a Nxt like consensus mechanism, which is also POS.