The presidency ends with Trump and one other who is a bit related to him.
You really have to be strong enough to handle what is to come.

My condolences to the bereaved family/friends. May GOD help them bear it.

It's important to note that as a new convert you are exposed to new hard-to-believe and faith-testing reality, and need a stronger body to handle it. True baptism renews the body and makes it very strong to be bear with the new reality.

MESSIAH Says: "no one puts new wine into old bottle; or else the new wine bursts the bottle, the wine is spilled, and the bottle are ruined. But new wine must be put into new bottle and both are preserved”


Fasting could also help a body handle strong reality

My condolences to the bereaved family/friends. May GOD help them bear it.

It's important to note as a convert you are exposed to new reality and need a stronger body to handle it. True baptism renews the body and makes it very strong to be bear with the new reality.

MESSIAH Says: "no one puts new wine into old wineskins; or else the new wine bursts the wineskins, the wine is spilled, and the wineskins are ruined. But new wine must be put into new wineskins.”

Not as simple as that. Currency debasement is simply the lowering of the value of a currency. Inflation could either be monetary/currency inflation, or price inflation of goods and services.
Currency debasement is a problem while currency inflation is not necessarily a problem if demand for the currency is stronger than its supply. Basically if you are running your economy well, making it more attractive, producing high quality goods and services, there are strong demand for what you produce, etc. demand would be so strong that you could inflate or print out more money to certain level, maybe 50% lower than the demand for the currency yet the currency would still increase in value. The demand for the currency have become extremely high in this regards.
But if the supply of a currency is greater than its demand, price of goods and services would typically rise when the currency is used to increase spending of the goods and services thereby increasing their demands, and if their supply is not increased enough.
So it basically depends on who runs the economy, and how much influence he/she has. If he knows what he is doing the currency and price of goods and services will be OK or even be better regardless of inflating or increasing the supply of the currency. In this case, the currency won't be debased
*A currency could also be inflated in a controlled manner by competent people and used productively, yet it won't be debased nor price of goods and services increased.

In regards to Bitcoin, having 21million supply cut isn't enough if you don't have the right people to make it valuable and increase its demand. So, it could still lose alot of its value and its price will fall in a short period of time, if it's being mismanaged, misused, not properly developed  etc by the wrong people.
.

Not as simple as that. Currency debasement is simply the lowering of the value of a currency. Inflation could be either monetary/currency inflation, or price inflation of goods and services.
Currency debasement is a problem while currency inflation is not necessarily a problem if demand for the currency is stronger than the supply. Basically if you are running your economy well, making it more attractive, producing high quality goods and services, there are strong demand for what you produce, etc. demand would  so strong that you could inflate or print out more money to certain level, maybe 50% lower than the demand for the currency yet the currency would still increase in value. The demand for the currency have become extremely high in this regards.
But if the supply of a currency is greater than its demand, price of goods and services would  typically rise when the currency is used to increase spending of the goods and services thereby increasing their demands, and if their supply is not increased enough.
So it basically depends on who runs the economy, and how much influence he/she has. If he knows what he is doing the currency and price of goods and services will be OK or even be better regardless of inflating or increasing the supply of the currency. In this case, the currency won't be debased


In regards to Bitcoin, having 21million supply cut isn't enough if you don't have the right people to make it valuable and increase its demand. So, it could still lose alot of its value and its price will fall in a short period of time if it's being mismanaged, misused, not properly developed  etc by the wrong people.
.

Leadership role is about real influence people can have on others/society. It cannot be created or bought with money.
It's about being passionate about the people you care about, with deep understanding of how to govern them. The strong passion which is hard to fake or sustain for so long is what moves the masses.
You could find this character in either the rich or poor family, doesn't have anything to do with financifal statue.
And it's more suitable for those who can make sacrifices or who can be selfless, for the good of others. Not suitable for rich or poor that are not ready to die for the people, and this is very common among most rich or poor families.
So, true leaders are typically rare and are not determined by financial factor. They are instead determined by the desire for morality or for things to be done right

The best option for employers is to focus on who can solve problems regardless of University degree or things like that otherwise the purpose of school is defeated
People go to school to gain proper knowledge of things that matter and use that for the good of society and their own good. Employers have to focus on people who have the right knowledge to fit in particular roles in a company or business and for the benefit of society. I believe it's right to go for the best, not minding whether they own the school or university degree or not. That is how a  society will be able get the best services or products from such company. And the company would be profitable.

The best or good quality should always be the standard regardless of where they come from. If the university can produce the best, fine, otherwise people are free to get them from anywhere. If they are asked for proof of education they should be bold enough to show where the knowledge that made them the best really comes from. I for example could present the Word/Knowledge of GOD and expect It to be approved immediately since it's producing great result for the company.

Companies and others should simply focus on who can get things done better. That could also help the certificate issuing universities to focus on what works for their students rather than how the system wants them to be programmed.

Well, the government could intervene and solve the issues in a very controlled manner to prevent things like inflation, "debt", etc from increasing.
I would suggest they get as many people with diverse talents/skills in house construction and related industries for the construction of houses especially for those who contribute enough to society but can't afford to own their own homes.
The governments should print enough dollars to channel to the industres in controlled manner. The money should be sort of escrowed in the banks/treasury and gradually released to fund 1.industries that create home building materials that are in abundant supply in the country 2. Fund companies that produce (or can produce) raw materials or natural resources that are abundant in country and necessary for housing constructions and related equipments. 3. fund the house or home construction workers.
It's recommended that those who take part in this should mostly get escrowed or locked funds until certain or all parts of a job is completed, then the works are tested for high quality and the full fund or probably part of it gradually released if set standard is fully or partially met otherwise they may be given more time to complete the work and in high quality to get paid.
Funds moving from one account of a person participating in the project to the other should remain locked until work is done. Strong and healthy competition should be encouraged to get the best people to finish their jobs faster and according to required standard. And they can cooperate to solve the problems and earn rewards.

*These suggestions are designed/crafted to work mostly in USA. So be careful applying it in other countries without permission.

I think people could be paid according to how productive and beneficial their works are to society regardless of how long they work. The benefits should be good or add to the quality of customers wellbeing, or to the satisfaction it brings to their lives. This could push workers to focus more on things they are gifted in and spend more time with them, not necessarily at their offices/companies, but places like homes.
Your work needs to becomes part of you, assuming it's your role in life, as that is main reason you exist in the first place.  If it's something you are gifted or talented in, you would be enjoying it alot with the accompanying health benefits, and you wouldn't want to spend less time on it.
Rewards or money ought to be secondary othwise it becomes the main reason for working and less about passion. Passion could make people work harder, better and longer.

Ofcourse, people need to give more to their country than they take, and it should be good quality and very useful things they are giving. They will gain alot and the debt burden lessened by giving this way...and giving the wrong things is as bad as not giving atall. I think this is what the current US administration is trying to achieve with its economy to make it more profitable and suitable, but alot of people don't seem to understand. Some are more concerned about self than the collective or country first, which can add more to the issues.

Beside, supporting bad and unprofitable things is the major reasons countries are in debt. USA for example is funding an unjust and unprofitable war in Ukraine, just to support her ally and interest. But injustice or evil things like that are unprofitable and more expensive to support, and you end up losing, no matter the amount of money you pour in. Even if you gain something it becomes a problem because the source is evil.
Seems the current USA administration is aware of this, and is trying to stop the war the right way, or push the burden on those who prefer things to be the way they are, and it is even trying to recover what it spent via the mineral deals and other means.

I think doing things right, like the current US admin is trying to do can improve things alot.

Better to have a stablecoin backed by something valuable, so that If for some strange reasons it loses its peg investors can always get back the something it's backed by, or the stablecoin can automatically or manually peg backy to fiat like USD as long as their is sufficient amount of backed asset.
Better to use native stablecoin that depends on strong security of its decentralized system which is basically technically and morally sound members/member with strong influence over the security of the system.

Bitcoin "tops out" or stops moving up if nothing strong or reasonable enough can push up further. We're temporarily in that period until there is something good or strong enough to push it up. October depends on this factor too.

That would depend on whether the real reason for the conflict is addressed.. If Russia, people of Donbas and others are nolonger under threats, ofcourse it would work. Otherwise they will be immuned from any tarrif war while it may backfire. "May" is used here because the economy of USA is foretold to be better.

A child who is more connected to a father or king that rules eally well will be more suitable regardless of adoption or not. If the kingdom likes the king/father they will likely prefer someone like him or someone who will rule like him (or better) as replacement.

Children are usually more connected to their parents because they are designed in similar manner, have more compatible behaviors(such as likes and dislikes) programmed/trained by the parents in ways they preferred. If the adopted have these characteristics more than the blood children they would likely be preferred by the king or father. Ofcourse, it's possible for a father to adopt someone because he is like him, or they are very compatible such that they both like or dislike what each other like or dislike.
By the way, what counts most is the connection with the kingdom's cherished values. If the father does well promoting the values and making the kingdom better, people would be ok to see a replacement like him regardless where he comes from.

It will quite hard to find adopted with these characteristics, but it's possible, especially in Christianity. An adopted son who loves the CREATOR of the Universe more than his other siblings could be made the Priest or Leader of both his adopted family and Christian community.

Bitcoin simply reacted to what was happening on this forum especially. Di it's better to trade according to Bitcoin/crypto activities of the one/ones with the most influence here than moving against him/them.
The so called big players are all distractions. Their effect on Bitcoin price is close to zero, if in doubt, let them choose a week/month to move it to any direction they wish either by "pumping" in alot of money into the market or othwise. Price will move on the contrary side.

Things that are most connected to Bitcoin move the price the most. So, you have to find out what the "big players" support or promote about Bitcoin to determine if they can really move the price to the direction they wish. If they don't consistently support or promote its principles like true decentralization, self-custody, transparency, immutability, privacy, community consensus etc then their influences on the price is as "big" as that of newbies who are still discovering Bitcoin.
What gives Bitcoin a massive boost are the extraordinary and things that are according to its ideals. That's where the value is..

Ofcourse, privacy is an essential part of the core principle of Bitcoin because it protects users from abuse (from centralized world) that may be against Bitcoin and the freedom it offers

Also, due to the transparent nature of transactions or activities on the Bitcoin Network and the need to keep users safe when interacting with strangers during transactions, the privacy becomes necessary. For these reasons, peer-to-peer transactions (without intermediary or third party) is required in the Bitcoin whitepaper. So this is basically a direct transaction with your peer, with no one else in between to violate the core Bitcoin principle like privacy.
We could however do things in ways that do not violate the privacy of users if kyc becomes necessary. But that would still involve p2p or decentralized setup.
 The centralized exchanges and platforms are operating outside of the Bitcoin principles hence cannot be considered part of the Bitcoin Network nor seen as the proper way to do Bitcoin transactions (So you have to be careful how you use them). Alot of users simply have little choice since there are very few convenient, Bitcoin-friendly, decentralized local/global ways to exchange Bitcoin.. This is what the Bitcoin/crypto communities are currently trying to fix so that in the end you conveniently transact with peers especially those nearest to you without giving away your privacy.

Bitcoin will definitely not be involved in World's politics. Politics is immoral, like game theory. It  isn't going to part of the evil.
It will remain neutral and be open to people and even governments (especially the resistance) who wish to use it for good, like to survive tyranny, oppression, lawlessness, choas, as long as they aren't trying to escape true justice
Countries or governments who were unjustly sactiioned are free to use especially in p2p decentralized manner to avoid rogue centralized exchanges or platforms from targeting them. I'm particularly referring to Russia who is helping the people of Donbas and others escape oppression from tyrannical governments who wish to erase their true identity and force them to accept immoral way of life.
Bitcoin will work against those who try to violate its sacred principles for no just reason, or use its system to target innocent Bitcoin users fleeing tyranny.
It definitely won't tolerate any attempt to use its system for immoral purposes. We must work together as community in making sure violators are exposed and get the required justice.

It's about things that meet Christian standards.
Our standard is anything that's good and according to Word of GOD.
 The Word of GOD encourages us to build on solid foundation in everything we create or do. The solid foundation is MESSIAH JESUS.
Here is an idea how this works, if you are building a community, you make sure it's built on love for GOD and man. To love GOD is to do things that pleases HIM. So, you have to be conscious of the fact that GOD is the CREATOR of the natural things you see around you and make sure you handle them with care, treat them right, and not to abuse or misuse them.
Don't do what GOD hates, and make sure you are thankful to HIM for HIS creations which you can't do without. Give Glory to HIM for every miracles and achievements rather than take the glory,because without HIM the miracles and achievements are impossible.

Then remember to love man whom GOD made the caretaker of HIS creations. Don't wrong anyone.
Build the community in a way that take care of everyone's good interest. No harm should be caused, encouraged or left unchecked.

This is close to what was achieved with Bitcoin and other good creations of men you can think of.  Does not mean those things have become a religion or those things you claim Bitcoin is. It's because they are built in love for others, or in consideration for everyone's good interest.Things built this way are hard to destroy.
If you successfully build the right community that meet the CHRIST standard, you don't call that a religion. Same with Bitcoin, it's not a religion, it's a technology built according to the right standard or principles.
In places where choas or anarchy exists you'll see its worth because it's built to be protective of humans in that situation. It will be used to save lives in chaotic times, and was built to survive the choas as it was built according to the right standard mentioned above.

It's upto the fiat governments to decide.
But primoting Bitcoin in this manner will have little to negative benefit to the Bitcoin Network unless they use it decentrally which the governments will unlikely approve since they'll have almost no control of its usage in their area of jurisdictions. And they can't be allowed to control the Bitcoin system for this reason.

The best way to promote Bitcoin is among people who want to free from a failing/oppressive centralized financial system. They should mostly be your target. And they should be encouraged to use Bitcoin in decentralized manner which is more beneficial to the Bitcoin system. And they can connect with one another offline and online, in decentralized manner, to form a parallel worldwide communities

If you don't want to be taxed in that manner, just make sure you are completely independent of the government. That will mean you self-custody and take responsibility of your bitcoins rather than depending on exchanges licensed and supported by your governments.
The idea behind taxation is to enable government to fund things people who pay the taxes will benefit from. So if you don't want to be part of it then you make sure you don't benefit from things funded with taxes. One of the best way to ensure this doesn't happen is live seperately in places where you are unlikely to benefit from tax funded services, infrastructures, etc. That would likely be remote places where people provide for all their personal needs and sometimes contribute money to fund public infrastructures/services.  Same is applicable in cyberspace, you can just join a opensource, decentralized communities where people provide all their needs and are independent of the typical governments.

It's not ethical or moral to dodge taxes when you are supposed to contribute. But if you selfcustody without relying on government in anyway it becomes moral. If you are worried about governments abusing this in the name of penalizing you for not paying taxes, even though you don't benefit from the tax funded services/infrastructures, you could go fully decentralized and don't pass through governments licensed platforms. There is nothing wrong in doing this as long as you are completely independent of the government.

What Bitcoin and other cryptocoins need, especially for things like inheritance planning, is an auto-transfer feature to transfer all your bitcoins in different accounts/addresses to a single address your next-of-kin has access to, when the other addresses are nolonger active for specific period of time..
So, your next-of-kin (could be your wife, mother, father etc) is intially given a copy of the keys (seedphrase) of the address that will recieve the transfered coins when you are nolonger alive/accessible. The next of kins hides the keys, and you could also have a copy just incase the next-of-kin loses hers or just in case the coins are transferred while you are still alive(maybe the accounts were inactive due to ill health, imprisonment, forgotten, etc).


But since this feature is probably not available for now, bitcoiners and others could simply write down all their keys or seedphrase with bitcoins, on papers or metallic sheets, with clear instructions on how to use them to access the bitcoins... Then lock them up in metallic safeboxes and hide them somewhere safe for their next-of-kins to access when they are nolonger alive/accessible... you could have dublicates in multiple boxes hidden in different places. The next-of-kins should be aware where they are hidden.  And then give the physical keys of the boxes to the right churches, institutions, etc, for safe keeping, on the condition that they get released to your next-of-kins who present your authentic death certificates or things like that.