Congratulations, sold out and what are the next steps to make the development of this project even further? Will it fit the roadmap?

My apologies for missing this reply, I must have not noticed there is a reply and the thread were drowned by other new posts on my list. Glad that you bumped it and took my attention.

To continue and simplify the... curiosity, this is what you have in mind while you planned your tokenomics:

Total supply is 2,000,000, hard cap is at 1,500,000. This means you planned to have 500,000 wPGO for team and development allocation, which goes as follows:

25% Development & Operations
25% Dex liquidity
20% Marketing & Promotions
15% Partnerships and Exchanges
15% Team Development

I'll make it easy with the rounded rate of ETH highest from past days, namely at 1,400 USD/ETH, while factually the rate and amount in mind while budgeting this tokenomics were much lower, as it follows early Jan's ETH price. And I'll assume your token price raises 100% from the presale price, namely at 0.000004.

So, based on above points, you planned to have


Were you saying you planned exchanges, team development, projecr development, liquidity, and marketing with less than 3,000 USD at best? And please don't use the excuse "nothing is set in stone" as it is rather unprofessional, because if you're really serious with a project, you won't stray far --or at all-- from the goal you set yourself. This is what you have in mind when you initially budgeting the project, this is the basic mainframe of wPGO. 3,000 USD?

Again, because you disagree doesn't make it unprofessional and I don't use excuses. Please don't tell me I am not serious about my project. Once again you continue to judge and insult. The distribution is on the website and may be adjusted according to the needs of the project, that's common sense. By the way ALL of the wPGO sold:)

Allow me to re-quote myself, as below. If you carefully read my "interrogation", you'll see I asked about your plan on the first place. Saying the exact number can not be said right now is somewhat in a realm of acceptable if the final number is tied to the amount of token sale. But I am rather sure that your team, like most projects, is rather optimistic with your goal, and there is a point in your meeting that discuss something like "suppose (or hopefully) we reached hard cap, we'll put xxx wPGO as LP". Forgive the rudeness, but I find it hard to believe that a team plan everything in their project with "let's decide the numbers when the token sale result comes out"


That's the plan, if you don't like it then don't invest. And that's OK, that's why you do your DD. Good luck.

I would really appreciate if you can be more generous in giving information, especially one as crucial as this one. How do you expect people to believe in your credibility if you intentionally witheld information like this?

I believe I asked about the number in token, in wPGO if I have to be extremely clear.

If I have to make do with your information, given the presale price is 0.000002 ETH, and I would assume price will be around that after presale (how could I know the exact public sale price? Team didn't disclose that, it's just listed as "TBA"), and you state that LP provided by team will be 4 ETH --let's disregard the "up to" and "more" because it adds more ambiguity than clarity--, it means the entire total supply will be allocated for LP. This, clearly,  extremely contradicting your own token allocation. Even saying "business needs to be flexible to thrive and nothing sets in stone", such difference in application and planning would lead people to assume you're either inconsistent or thoughtless.

Very well, fair enough. Let's suppose everything goes to plan and you successfully reached your hardcap during crowdsale, what'll be the allocated LP provided by team?
[/quote

Up to 4 ETH or more.

Let's make this short and simple, what is the exact number you planned to be the initial LP provided by the dev team? Not in percentage, in actual numbers of token.

Well, one thing that perhaps you need to learn in crypto, when people conducting DD, is everything should be approached and considered suspicious and guilty until proven otherwise. So pardon the annoyance, but this is me trying to prove otherwise. Certainly as you're legit, all the questions were easy for you.

And why next question? The previous one were not answered yet: where does exactly the 25% of LP allocation --planned to be-- come from?

Your projects project's policy is the capability to adjust token allocation to fit certain circumstances? Oh, wow. So, if the buyer's token will not be forcibly held to provide LP, where does exactly the 25% reserves of LP comes from?

You're confused again. How can we hold a users tokens when they are in their wallets? That does not make sense and impossible. And yes, the health and success of the project takes precedent over making allocations set in stone. This is true for any business or company. A budget is a guide and it is common for it to be adjusted if necessary. This is what my experience in running several businesses, experience and education has taught me. It is also common sense.

The word "mostly" usually refers to a better part of fractions. I see that according to your planned distribution, the token allocated for LP will be 25% (hardly a "mostly) of token sold?

Also, it confuses me in two ways: first, you said that one of the purpose of wPGO were to let holders earn from LP, but wouldn't this "token sale will be used mostly to supply the LP" indicate that the pool will be provided by you? At the same time, what confuses me secondly, in case where you refer that the 25% were supplied by token buyers, were you meaning to say that when they buy, 25% of their token will be forcibly held by the project to be sent to LP?

Sorry your confused, again. 25% yes, if we need more then more will be used if necessary. These are estimates, nothing is written in stone, a successful business must be flexible and adapt for the success of the project. The LP in any project listed on Uniswap is not solely supplied by project itself. The project sometimes supplies some liquidity which is always good. No, their tokens won't be forcibly held.