I get where you're coming from. It's definitely tough to get everyone on the same page, especially when each person has their own theory and approach.
But I'm not trying to enforce centralized control or reach some global agreement.
What I'm suggesting is more like an open infrastructure with a few basic principles. Not rules, just a framework. Some people have idle GPUs, others are strong coders, and some have solid heuristics. If we can bring those strengths together in a flexible system, everyone benefits.
Even if some prefer to work solo, that's completely fine. This doesn't interfere with that. It's simply an option for those who want to collaborate more efficiently.
If even a small group of three to five people are willing to try a structured approach, that's already enough to form a working foundation. From there, it can grow naturally if it proves useful.
yea i like the idea of "shared pool" like btcpuzzle.info(not really shared) but everyone got equivalent reward based on their work, what do yall think?
You mean like ttd71 pool ?
Mistakes as a Philosophy of Excuse A Classic Mental Trap That Kills Growth
We all break, fall, and mess up in this world. That’s normal, no argument there. The problem isn’t the mistakes themselves, but how we perceive them and what we do with them.
Instead of honestly admitting, “That was a mistake, it held us back, and I could’ve done better,” many turn their failures into pretty stories that fit a convenient narrative:
“It was a lesson from fate, it had to be.”
“Without that, I wouldn’t have grown, it made me stronger.”
“The universe decided it that way so it’s fair.”
“I got stronger because I fell.”
Sounds cool and inspiring, right? But it’s not objective truth it’s an excuse. A comfy excuse for not wanting to change the system, not wanting to change ourselves, not wanting to take responsibility for real progress. It’s a philosophy of powerlessness disguised as wisdom.
Why Does This Happen?
Admitting a mistake is a dead end means accepting not only failure but pain, responsibility, even loss. It’s hard, scary, painful.
Way easier to tell yourself and the world: “Everything happened as it should, I just didn’t get it then,” and keep floating on inertia, changing nothing.
This philosophy lifts the burden of searching for real, hard solutions and actions we just “survive” failures and pretend it’s “experience.”
Why Is This “Survivor Philosophy” Dangerous?
It turns failure into routine, making mistakes something “mandatory” that just repeats over and over.
It blocks growth because it locks us in a loop: “suffering acceptance resignation.” Instead of breaking the cycle, we blend into it.
People stop fighting for real change, stop seeking alternatives they just learn to “survive” defeats, glorifying them as inevitable experience.
Practical Consequences in Crypto-Puzzles and Life
This approach is not just philosophy but a real trap that slows progress in our projects and efforts.
Many working solo and stuck in “survivor philosophy” fear to unite.
They fear showing vulnerability, imperfection, fear being “exposed” by the group.
Instead of seeing union as a chance to grow, learn, and expand possibilities, they cling to the illusion of full control even if it’s in isolation.
Why Collaboration Pays Off Despite Fears
Increased power and speed of progress.
Combined resources and brains push the work faster. In crypto-mining and puzzle-solving, collective effort stabilizes results and raises chances.
Resource optimization.
Splitting costs and efforts technical, mental, emotional. No need to reinvent the wheel solo.
Risk reduction.
One solo failure means collapse; in a team, one’s mistake is covered by others.
Innovation stimulation.
Diverse views and skills open new paths a solo player might never see.
Technical side
It’s crucial that technical mechanisms to measure contribution are tuned not only to “power” (hardware, compute) but also to overall input: ideas, optimizations, process organization, communication, and more.
A properly built contribution system lets every participant see their effort valued fairly and adequately. This eases internal conflicts and keeps motivation high.
Designing the system so it benefits everyone means it’s not about hardware, but about the team, the common movement, and synergy.
How to Fight Fears and Doubts
Transparent result distribution mechanisms (like smart contracts) remove fear of theft and injustice.
Clear role division lets everyone give their best without chaos and bureaucracy.
Small pilot groups where collaboration can be tested are great for building trust.
What to Do with the Philosophy of Excuses and Why You Need to Break It
Stop glorifying failures and excusing them with pretty words.
Honestly admit: “I messed up, need to change approach.”
Focus on real actions, not on pretty stories.
Learn from mistakes as concrete data, not as fate-driven lessons.
Bottom Line
If you want to just survive and awkwardly fumble solo forget this “survivor philosophy.” It only gives you a comfy trap.
Real growth starts where you are honest with yourself and others, where mistakes aren’t reasons to shut up or hide but signals to change.
Unite, build teams, build trust through transparency and honesty. Stop fearing vulnerability it’s what makes us stronger.
Because true power isn’t in fighting the world alone but in the collective breakthrough beyond the usual.