Ayn Rand (author of Atlas Shrugged, commonly called the 'Libertarian Bible') said this:
"Since there is no such thing as the right of some men to vote away the rights of others, and no such thing as the right of the government to seize the property of some men for the unearned benefit of othersthe advocates and supporters of the welfare state are morally guilty of robbing their opponents, and the fact that the robbery is legalized makes it morally worse, not better. The victims do not have to add self-inflicted martyrdom to the injury done to them by others; they do not have to let the looters profit doubly, by letting them distribute the money exclusively to the parasites who clamored for it. Whenever the welfare-state laws offer them some small restitution, the victims should take it..."
Assuming that Robby1021 pays his taxes, it is reasonable that he should be able to benefit from the school funded with the same pot he helps fill. If he didn't, on the principle of not accepting the unearned, he would be a double-martyr -- first, for being required to fund things that he did not choose to, and second for not being able to benefit from those things after funding them.
Of course, if he doesn't pay taxes, I completely agree with you.