Unfortunately, amount of raised funds stands still. Yes, I know that therere still 5 months until the end of the ICO, but it feels like even the soft cup isnt raised yet.
I wouldnt like to lose such a promising project. Im fed up with absence of adequate tools for crypto currency trading.
Its unlikely that FFS will give it up. They will raise funds in other way. As for adequate tools for crypto trading, its the matter of time. Im sure that major exchanges are already working on it.
Nope, major exchanges dont take care yet. The need foot for thought in the form of competition from some FortFC, then theyll so something.
I dont think that they dont estimate development potential of other companies and just idle their time away. You see, its very hard to implement large-scale trading volume into the crypto market at once! Binance understands how much its needed to spend on this.
Then they need to start with at least something, just like FortFC does. It isnt going to move mountains, its more interested in gradual development. And it does what is right, sure it wont fail because of this.
Yep, but it needs at least to raise the soft cap first
Unfortunately, amount of raised funds stands still. Yes, I know that therere still 5 months until the end of the ICO, but it feels like even the soft cup isnt raised yet.
I wouldnt like to lose such a promising project. Im fed up with absence of adequate tools for crypto currency trading.
I've already seen hundreds of similar projects. It seems to me that Gamelife wont succeed.
All the projects you mention are centralized, its unlikely that they will be really interesting for the users.
Maybe, but I still dont understand how Gamelife will use decentralization and smart contracts.
Smart contracts replace the sale intermediaries, decentralization allows to make deals directly, avoiding huge commissions which are a common thing for centralized platforms.
But centralized projects sometimes dont have sale intermediaries, too, so I cant say that this is n incredible advantage.
If theres no intermediary, than it takes long to decide wholl be the first to act: a seller or a buyer, thats why the risk is just hug.
Sure it isnt less risky when a centralized platform representative acts as an representative. Just think about it: they make the users agree with a long list of conditions, and theres denial of responsibility among them. Id better wait for release of Gamelife and then sell all my in-game items.
Post
Topic
BoardService Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: CoinMakers by ICO Brothers – creation of cryptocurrency, forking
by
Varanasi
on 12/01/2019, 06:20:30 UTC
Could you please clarify what your company specialized in?
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: 🔥[ANN] Ura.Market — A New Format For Safe Investment🔥
by
Varanasi
on 29/12/2018, 12:27:23 UTC
How will you divide the dividends between all the investors?
Doesnt the fact that the countries members of FAFT are restricted to invest in the project seem silly to you? Sure foul play is involved.
Ive never heard about such restrictions, and the team hasnt made any official announcements so far. Where did you find this info?
Didnt you read the WP. Thats where its told about in the 7th part.
It looks like you are very inattentive. It is said that there that the citizens of the countries which FATF imposed sanctions against, not the countries who are members of FATF themselves.
Yes, youre right, i was wrong. thanks for putting me wise, i could miss the ICO itself.
What about US citizens? Do they traditionally miss any forms of investment?
Yes, at least, this point is specified in the WP, so i dont think that the team is planning to violate it.
It turns out that even people having official licenses of investors wont be able to take part in ICO GG? I ask the projects team to clarify this statement.
Doesnt the fact that the countries members of FAFT are restricted to invest in the project seem silly to you? Sure foul play is involved.
Ive never heard about such restrictions, and the team hasnt made any official announcements so far. Where did you find this info?
Didnt you read the WP. Thats where its told about in the 7th part.
It looks like you are very inattentive. It is said that there that the citizens of the countries which FATF imposed sanctions against, not the countries who are members of FATF themselves.
Yes, youre right, i was wrong. thanks for putting me wise, i could miss the ICO itself.
What about US citizens? Do they traditionally miss any forms of investment?
Is FortFCs amount of collected money 36K Euros? I thought that there would be several millions! Just disappointment
Wait, what several millions are you talking about? The private sale ended recently, the pre-sale has just started.
Hmm does this change anything?
Yes, not all the investors can buy tokens during these two rounds because the entry barrier is high. In addition, the ICO itself isnt promoted well on the Internet so far. The project will be promoted closer to the main round.
Well, lets hope. You see, the project is quite promising, i wouldnt like it to fail at such an early development stage.