Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 49 results by VikAn80
She has every opportunity to do so. But I think the time has not come yet and will not take long. I think another 2-3 generations and the issue of paper money is finally resolved.
The ICO will never end. This is the same kickstarter, only here the public is much more, and employees are ordinary people. All businessmen need is to offer ideas to the world, and the rest is already template
Re: Venezuela and Palestina agreed to start a binational bank with El Petro
I think it's just an attempt to open a Bank without a government loan. If earlier it was necessary to take a huge loan, now you can come up with a token and hope that its price will go up.
Currently I own a lot of altcoin, I bought them at ico. My account is being downgraded several times. There are many people who say bitcoin will continue to decrease, so altcoin prices also decreased compared to USDT. So now, should I sell them and wait for the price to buy back? Give me advice 
If you sell them now, you're gonna go down, and you'll never have a chance to get your money back. Better wait. All your coins can't go down. Then you're just an unlucky guy who shouldn't be in this business. There are always good projects everywhere. There are no seasons and other things. A good idea can be born at any time and develop in any conditions. So never give up trying to find a good ICO.
Re: is there an alternative to Coin Market Capitalisation | CoinMarketCap
is there an alternative to Coin Market Capitalisation | CoinMarketCap
I don't understand what you want. Other functionality or something? These are all statistical sites that display General information. There may be millions of them, or there may be ordinary tables with weekly updates.Hello everyone, I'm following the bounty campaign of DigitizeCoin through www.bountyhive.io, this campaign is about to end and when I go to do my work I find this message on the official Twitter account:
I think many have gone through this situation, this happens recurrently with the bounties campaigns? With which managers? What advice can you provide?
There's no way to defend themselves. The thing is that the ICO resource is inexhaustible. The main thing is the idea. But investors resources have been exhausted. Therefore, many ICOS cannot dial their softcap and close."Dear Digitizers, We are happy to see so much support for our project.
Unfortunately, we had only raised 150ETH and did not reach our SoftCap.
All contributors will be refunded. We will be sending out details on how to refund your contributions shortly.
Regards, Team Digitize."
Unfortunately, we had only raised 150ETH and did not reach our SoftCap.
All contributors will be refunded. We will be sending out details on how to refund your contributions shortly.
Regards, Team Digitize."
I think many have gone through this situation, this happens recurrently with the bounties campaigns? With which managers? What advice can you provide?
Suppose if there are a number of ICOs started for different coins by anonymous developers then how can we find that which one the legit ICO and which one is scam ICO?
If the scammers are not experienced, it is easy to determine the banal verification of all information. But also, many scammers simply make a copy of a successful ICO changing only the name, there is little that will help, because many are really similar to each other and equally successful.Crypto world is in crysis now and it's not only due to red market but also because of tons of scam ICOs. And that pisses a lot of bounty hunters off cause scam ICOs produce useless unworthy tokens! People waste sometimes several months to participatein bounty and either get no tokens or get shitcoins.
It's so hard now to find a good bounty. eCoinomic.net platform is running one now and it looks pretty solid and trustworthy, they also predict a balanced growth for CNC token https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2897866.msg29799978#msg29799978
But how do you guys know if your bounty is trustable? Why do you personally trust bounty you're participating in right now?
I personally trust the managers who carry out the bounty. Also analyze personally, but it gives a small effectiveness, as he bounty Manager can be deceived, and the project to be a copy of a successful bounty.It's so hard now to find a good bounty. eCoinomic.net platform is running one now and it looks pretty solid and trustworthy, they also predict a balanced growth for CNC token https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2897866.msg29799978#msg29799978
But how do you guys know if your bounty is trustable? Why do you personally trust bounty you're participating in right now?
What altcoins are you guys picking up for cheap in this dip?
I buy Ripple and Verge. Also slowly fill up your collection Taas. To trade buy Ethereum and bitcoin. Yes, any coins whose price is not in place.I am wondering about people investing in an ICO if it is really worth because base on my obvservation there are many investors on ICO period and i do not know some would always say that investing in an ICO is risky. I would like to get the investors idea directly if they were really successful in their investment or the haters that say investing in ICO risky is really true. This is also more like a small study for future references that someday i am going to invest in an ICO since i have seen a great potential in investing on it. Thus, i have seen many discounts offering bonuses and that is the good thing that happen in joining in ICO investments. Hopefully i could get some answers in the forum.
Any ICO offers high returns and profits from the purchase of their shares or securities, in our case tokens. But alas, all this you will, in case of success of ICO. And no one can guarantee success, even with a large collection of funds, companies can not get on the rails.There are lots of altcoins(well, ICOs) Can anyone suggest some altcoins to buy?
I searched some on ICO listing cites, but it seems a lot of them are paid to be rated high. Some coins have only 100+ members on Telegram...
I know that the price will go up and down but how to find some altcoins that is really doing something revolutionary and worth to invest?
Ripple, Verge Boss coin and taas. He kept this briefcase and they are very happy. TaAS in the days of the ICO money and they give a nice passive income.I searched some on ICO listing cites, but it seems a lot of them are paid to be rated high. Some coins have only 100+ members on Telegram...
I know that the price will go up and down but how to find some altcoins that is really doing something revolutionary and worth to invest?
Value is 600-700$.
What is so special about platform which is in my opinion jumping point for many fake initial coin offers?
It is not a currency. I would have understood value if ether was currency, but it is not.
Yes, except for bitcoin and currencies are not present, the rest of it so. Stocks under the guise of currency. But still. Promotions which you can use to pay in shops, etc., can be considered a currency. In our world there are no restrictions on currencies. Currency is something equivalent that you can give when buying something, that is, exchange.What is so special about platform which is in my opinion jumping point for many fake initial coin offers?
It is not a currency. I would have understood value if ether was currency, but it is not.
Tim Draper: More Secure in Bitcoin Than the Money Sitting in Wells Fargo
Venture capitalist Tim Draper is bullish on Bitcoin and believes it will reach $250,000 in the next four years.
During a debate hosted by Intelligence Squared and the Adam Smith Society, Tim Draper was asked how Bitcoin compared with his previous tech investments in Hotmail, Skype, and Tesla. He replied bullishly, saying, Bitcoin will be bigger than all three combined. However, Draper didnt leave it at that he thinks it will be bigger than the iron age, the Renaissance, and the internet and says that the nascent technology will affect the entire world in a faster and more prevalent way than ever imagined.
The Debate: Bitcoin is more than a bubble and here to stay.
Backed up by Patrick Byrne (CEO of overstock), Draper took on Financial Times journalist, Gillian Tett, and Professor of Law, Eric Posner, both of whom argued that Bitcoin is indeed a bubble and strongly contested Drapers claims. Posner and Tett called into question the strengths of Bitcoin, arguing that they could be regarded as weaknesses. Posner suggested that the pseudonymization of identity enabled by the technology makes Bitcoin transactions the perfect vehicle for sophisticated criminal transactions. Tett focused on the risk involved with trusting computers with finance as they can be hacked, are prone to faults, and that Bitcoin is a terrible store of value.
These arguments wont be anything new to anyone who has studied the space, and the rebuttals of Draper and Byrne wont come as a surprise either. The pair acknowledged that Bitcoin was imperfect and drew attention to the fact the technology was designed to be open source so that unforeseen problems can be managed by the community. Byrne also pointed out that although Bitcoin has been hacked at more than anything in history, but unlike banks, it has yet to be defeated.
Draper was more brazen in his responses and implored the crowd to use fiat if they were looking to facilitate their own criminal activity as many Bitcoin criminals get caught. The venture capitalist responded to Tetts admission that she invests in several different fiat currencies by saying, Im so much more secure in my Bitcoin than I am in the money thats sitting there in Wells Fargo.
Who is right?
The short answer is its far too early to tell, but it is good to see the subject being discussed in this manner. Before the debate, Gillian Tett remarked that if both sides of an argument arent heard in the same room, on the same day, then the conversations can go past one another. Its probably safe to say shes right here because, although there is no shortage of media on either side of the argument, real debate on the subject can be difficult to find.
If crypto is going to head down the road Draper expects, its advocates need to be able to argue their case outside of the crypto community, and debate should be welcome as it not only gives both sides the ability to speak but also the ability to listen.
Drapers comments are to be expected
As crypto enthusiasts, its easy to agree when figures like Draper sing the praises of Bitcoin, but we shouldnt let confirmation bias get in the way of the issues. Draper is a successful investor, and he hasnt arrived there without making mistakes. He could be wholly right, wrong, or somewhere in between the latter is most likely. Draper allegedly owns 30,000 BTC, so he has a vested interest in Bitcoins success. That does not mean he is wrong, but it does mean his comments should be taken with a pinch of salt. Well-reasoned arguments are far more convincing than hype and chest beating because they allow people to make up their own minds.
The emergence of DLT might eclipse the impact of other innovations, but for now, the emphasis is not on critics to prove the crypto community wrong. Its up to those who champion DLT to convince the world theyre right.
Originally published at cryptodisrupt.com
If you consider the fact that when you store in crypto, my savings may increase, then Yes, it is safer. When stored in a Bank, under any percentage, you will lose more on commissions and payments.Venture capitalist Tim Draper is bullish on Bitcoin and believes it will reach $250,000 in the next four years.
During a debate hosted by Intelligence Squared and the Adam Smith Society, Tim Draper was asked how Bitcoin compared with his previous tech investments in Hotmail, Skype, and Tesla. He replied bullishly, saying, Bitcoin will be bigger than all three combined. However, Draper didnt leave it at that he thinks it will be bigger than the iron age, the Renaissance, and the internet and says that the nascent technology will affect the entire world in a faster and more prevalent way than ever imagined.
The Debate: Bitcoin is more than a bubble and here to stay.
Backed up by Patrick Byrne (CEO of overstock), Draper took on Financial Times journalist, Gillian Tett, and Professor of Law, Eric Posner, both of whom argued that Bitcoin is indeed a bubble and strongly contested Drapers claims. Posner and Tett called into question the strengths of Bitcoin, arguing that they could be regarded as weaknesses. Posner suggested that the pseudonymization of identity enabled by the technology makes Bitcoin transactions the perfect vehicle for sophisticated criminal transactions. Tett focused on the risk involved with trusting computers with finance as they can be hacked, are prone to faults, and that Bitcoin is a terrible store of value.
These arguments wont be anything new to anyone who has studied the space, and the rebuttals of Draper and Byrne wont come as a surprise either. The pair acknowledged that Bitcoin was imperfect and drew attention to the fact the technology was designed to be open source so that unforeseen problems can be managed by the community. Byrne also pointed out that although Bitcoin has been hacked at more than anything in history, but unlike banks, it has yet to be defeated.
Draper was more brazen in his responses and implored the crowd to use fiat if they were looking to facilitate their own criminal activity as many Bitcoin criminals get caught. The venture capitalist responded to Tetts admission that she invests in several different fiat currencies by saying, Im so much more secure in my Bitcoin than I am in the money thats sitting there in Wells Fargo.
Who is right?
The short answer is its far too early to tell, but it is good to see the subject being discussed in this manner. Before the debate, Gillian Tett remarked that if both sides of an argument arent heard in the same room, on the same day, then the conversations can go past one another. Its probably safe to say shes right here because, although there is no shortage of media on either side of the argument, real debate on the subject can be difficult to find.
If crypto is going to head down the road Draper expects, its advocates need to be able to argue their case outside of the crypto community, and debate should be welcome as it not only gives both sides the ability to speak but also the ability to listen.
Drapers comments are to be expected
As crypto enthusiasts, its easy to agree when figures like Draper sing the praises of Bitcoin, but we shouldnt let confirmation bias get in the way of the issues. Draper is a successful investor, and he hasnt arrived there without making mistakes. He could be wholly right, wrong, or somewhere in between the latter is most likely. Draper allegedly owns 30,000 BTC, so he has a vested interest in Bitcoins success. That does not mean he is wrong, but it does mean his comments should be taken with a pinch of salt. Well-reasoned arguments are far more convincing than hype and chest beating because they allow people to make up their own minds.
The emergence of DLT might eclipse the impact of other innovations, but for now, the emphasis is not on critics to prove the crypto community wrong. Its up to those who champion DLT to convince the world theyre right.
Originally published at cryptodisrupt.com