Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 326 results by Vince Torres
Is there some sort of end time for this and other rules?
Not an auction atm, just gauging interest.
Link: https://github.com/Namecoindotcom/dot-bit-addon
If anyone has any suggestions or comments I'd love to hear them.
And as always you can register a .bit domain for only $1 with bitcoin, litecoin and namecoin at http://namecoin.com
If anyone has any suggestions or comments I'd love to hear them.
And as always you can register a .bit domain for only $1 with bitcoin, litecoin and namecoin at http://namecoin.com
Re: Namecoin.com is back! Now with Bitcoin, Litecoin and Namecoin support.
The .bit Firefox addon is now opensource @ github.com
Link: https://github.com/Namecoindotcom/dot-bit-addon
Link: https://github.com/Namecoindotcom/dot-bit-addon
delisting cnc?
Possible this.Re: With Gold & Silver tumbling, will investors seek out Bitcoin as a hedge?
It would be fucked up to seriously invest in bitcoins
why? sure it has no guarantee and many obstacles to overcome if it wants longevity and adoption by more users (and governments) but nothing has a guarantee, as gold/silver is proving right now. I bought silver at $40/ounce three years ago when it was "the sure bet" and now I have less than half of my wealth. And I did that as a way to find a safe haven for a 12k investment that was salvaged from a failing IRA that had an original investment of 14k...
The majority of BTC investors bought BTC below its current price, and of all the options on the table, its appreciation since its inception and or any time prior to 6 months ago has outpaced all other options...
If you can't handle a 50% loss in an investment you may as well not invest. Quoted from Warren Buffet, paraphrased by me.
Funny thread 
belongs in the classic section. we need a board where all the classic threads live.
It's fun seeing all those coins around the $0.001 range and a few years later, we come back to a fun gem of the times when they barely had value.
Honestly, who could know.
Re: Namecoin.com is back! Now with Bitcoin, Litecoin and Namecoin support.
This looks like a really useful tool ... there are some concerns on the #namecoin irc
Quote
[16:39] http://namecoin.com/
[16:42] randy-waterhouse: do you know if the source code for the namecoin.com Firefox/Chrome plugin is posted anywhere?
[16:42] d'oh.. whenever i looked up namecoin i got redirected to the dotbit website
[16:42] extensions are already open source aren't they?
[16:42] echelon: not necessarily, extensions can be obfuscated
[16:44] Jeremy_Rand: good point, caution advised
[16:44] hopefully namecoin.bit guy will post eventually
[16:44] maybe waiting for first mover advantage to cement itself?
[16:45] anyone know who is behiind namecoin.com ??
[16:46] apparently this guy.. http://www.maayainfotech.com/
[16:49] interesting
[16:49] the extension is not obfuscated
[16:49] and it seems to retrieve this proxy auto-config file
[16:49] http://namecoin.com/extension/proxy.pac
[16:49] so the extension won't work if the domain is down
[16:49] and they could change it later on
[16:49] to do something more malicious
[16:49] ok, so the .pac file is hosted on a non-HTTPS domain
[16:49] yeah
[16:50] wonderful, so even if the operator is legit, some random guy on your network can install whatever pac file he wants onto your browser
[16:50] i dunno why they have to retrieve from the website anyway
[16:50] it could've been packaged with the extension
[16:50] yeah, suspicious
[16:42] randy-waterhouse: do you know if the source code for the namecoin.com Firefox/Chrome plugin is posted anywhere?
[16:42] d'oh.. whenever i looked up namecoin i got redirected to the dotbit website
[16:42] extensions are already open source aren't they?
[16:42] echelon: not necessarily, extensions can be obfuscated
[16:44] Jeremy_Rand: good point, caution advised
[16:44] hopefully namecoin.bit guy will post eventually
[16:44] maybe waiting for first mover advantage to cement itself?
[16:45] anyone know who is behiind namecoin.com ??
[16:46] apparently this guy.. http://www.maayainfotech.com/
[16:49] interesting
[16:49] the extension is not obfuscated
[16:49] and it seems to retrieve this proxy auto-config file
[16:49] http://namecoin.com/extension/proxy.pac
[16:49] so the extension won't work if the domain is down
[16:49] and they could change it later on
[16:49] to do something more malicious
[16:49] ok, so the .pac file is hosted on a non-HTTPS domain
[16:49] yeah
[16:50] wonderful, so even if the operator is legit, some random guy on your network can install whatever pac file he wants onto your browser
[16:50] i dunno why they have to retrieve from the website anyway
[16:50] it could've been packaged with the extension
[16:50] yeah, suspicious
Source code will be uploaded on github soon, been meaning to do that. I understand the concerns, and this is something that needs to be open source.
If they have the money to put into a successful product there is no reason they would limit themselves to bitcoin commerce solely unless they were selling a product market towards bitcoin such as asics.
.15
BIGMERVE wins with bid @ .15 btc, sending bitcoin address in pm.