Search content
Sort by

Showing 7 of 7 results by VossArtesian
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoind daemon synchronizing error on VPS(debian)
by
VossArtesian
on 27/05/2014, 16:32:50 UTC
The part highlighted also looks odd.  You may want to download and build from github because that version looks really old.

Did you by any chance do an apt-get for bitcoin?  iirc that version is way out of date.


...
       "version" : 32400,
  ...
I have no idea what this error mean, or how can i resolve this kind of error.

I got this same memory error, get stuck at the same block, and have the same version 32400.  That is however, the version installed from the bitcoin ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: KnC Repairs, They've treated us well, let's do the same for them.
by
VossArtesian
on 29/10/2013, 03:01:25 UTC
This is what i wrote to support after they told me that they do not  have an advanced RMA program.

Quote
What would be an estimated turnaround on that sort of service , and I assume all costs are covered by KnC.  Even 4 days without my unit  means I will never see an ROI so I hope your program can do a quicker turnaround than that. I propose a sort of BTC escrow program to be used in order to facilitate advanced RMA services to KnC customers. 

  • 1.Customer contacts support about an issue, and support determines from SSH ing into the miner to confirm that there is a hardware defect.
  • 2.Once a hardware defect is confirmed by KnC or ORSoC then the customer can choose to either do a standard RMA, or
  • 3.Put up BTC in the value of the the chip being sent ( or more if deemed necessary), held in escrow by a trusted bitcointalk forum member.
  • 4.KnC confirms the escrowed transaction for the customer, and then sends a replacement chip to the customer.
  • 5. Upon delivery of replacement chip(s) the customer immediately returns the defective chip, in the packaging the replacement came in.
  • 6. KnC confirms reception of the defective chip in Sweden at the factory
  • 7. At this point the RMA is completed and the escrowed funds can be returned to the customer, who has had 0 downtime

Obviously it would be to the discretion of your engineers about confirming hardware defects. But with BTC in escrow, the risk of sending out chips to customers is mitigated, and practically guarantees that KnC will either receive the defective chip from the customer or retain the escrowed funds in the amount of the goods sent, removing risk from the situation almost entirely.

   As I’ve said before I’ve had a wonderful experience with you guys so far, but to keep with the motto of under promise over deliver,  I have not been satisfied.  My unit was shipped a week late with a defect that caused it to max at ~100gh/s @157w   far below what was promised.  Here is your chance to over deliver, on those promises you made.  Help me get my unit back up to full speed, without having to deal with any downtime in the cutthroat game that is mining BTC.

I proposed the idea briefly on bitcointalk, and there was lots of customer support.  You guys have done great so far, and this really would be an opportunity over deliver, to stick it to the competition, put the customer first, and utilize one of the most useful, yet underutilized features of the bitcoin protocol.

my 2 mBTC 

please and thank you all for your wonderful service thus far.

I know they aren't going to create such a program based off this one email sent by a Batch 1 Mercury customer, but if this gets around enough we may be able to get what we want.  They've already surprised the market once
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Topic OP
KnC Repairs, They've treated us well, let's do the same for them.
by
VossArtesian
on 28/10/2013, 04:30:48 UTC
So I am a first batch KnC customer who just got my Mercury at the end of last week.  After some initial difficulties upgrading to the latest firmware etc. I got some help from Henrik from ORSoC in IRC, he ssh'd into my machine changed a bunch of settings and got it hashing at ~100gh/s.  Reason being that 1/4 of my chip is dead due to a hardware issue.  Glancing over the KnC forums I can see that I am far from alone having a defective chip and want to know how to go about getting it replaced.  Henrik from ORSoC mentioned that i will need to return my chip for replacement.

Obviously I have no interest in sending the chip back to Sweden before they can send me back another one, as even the 100 gh/s my miner can do is much better than the 0 I will get as soon as i send it out.  I wanted to post here to see if there is anyway we can try to get KnC Miner to do some sort of advanced RMA program.  They've no doubt proven themselves for their hardware, and ability to keep promises (at least significantly better than every company in the field with the exception of ASICMINER) and hardware issues aside I have had a fantastic customer experience with KnC.  I'd like to see if we can propose some sort of advanced RMA program, where a neutral forum member will hold escrowed BTC funds between KnC's customers and KnC, so that KnC can safely send out replacement chips to customers with defective units, without fear that the customer will run off with both chips. 

This is something I think would be greatly beneficial to all customers who have been affected by hardware defects, and still not place any undue costs on KnC for the advanced replacement of chips.  let me know if there is any support for this sort of program around here, I'm sure will enough support something like this could happen.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: KnCMiner list of orders - October delivery
by
VossArtesian
on 15/10/2013, 21:24:26 UTC
Mercury
Order #568x
Paid Aug 12
Status: Paid
Location: USA

EDIT: 10/16/2013  In Progress
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Mt.Gox Account secured with Yubikey but still had 29 BTCs stolen
by
VossArtesian
on 17/09/2013, 03:53:51 UTC
If someone were going to start attacking MtGox accounts, they aren't going to steal 29 BTC, et even worth the attention it brings... 2FA works fine, the OP enabled 2FA after attack. That simple.  
He is claiming otherwise. Although you are right, we would probably see evidence of more 2fa heists if the OPs claim is true. Perhaps this was a test run. Perhaps it's just a gox troll.

Logs would be nice (from gox), at the very least. Perhaps you can pull logs from the yubikey, idk if that is at all possible. In the end of the day the logs could be tampered with by either party so there is no way to know for sure.

If this is a lie by the OP we would need to find motive, perhaps another exchange spreading FUD.  

Gox has my real info, they can verify if I'm associated to another exchange or not. You're right about the seeing evidence of more 2fa heists though since my incident shouldn't be an isolated incident. For now, I have filed a police report with my local pd in addition to contacting my attorney general.

FACT:
Mt.Gox did not steal your coins.  They can literally print all the goxUSD, and trading BTC they want, and can be much more discreet, without leaving a paper trail. 
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: LiteTree
by
VossArtesian
on 05/09/2013, 07:33:26 UTC
They most likely will,  Coinbase recently hired Charlie Lee  (Coblee) the creator of Litecoin.  He has commented that they will consider doing so, but not yet, due to the fact the cryptocurrecny is too new to the world still.  They are still getting people to understand Bitcoin, adding another coin would only confuse and frighten them, hurting the crytpo movement in general.   yes all  BTC exchanges allow for BTC transfer between them.  Same goes for LTC exchanges.  Coinbase does allow for trading of BTC in and out as well, though it is not an exchange, per se
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: LiteTree
by
VossArtesian
on 28/08/2013, 02:39:19 UTC
I've never heard of Litetree before but it doesn't seem to be what you're looking for.
"LiteTree is a crypto currency exchange site. We take cash deposits on one side and litecoin deposits on the other side of the trade. Then we allow our customers to exchange their cash for litecoin or vice versa. LiteTree is a safe and secure platform for buyers and sellers to meet and exchange their litecoins. You will need to have downloaded a wallet separately before using our service. "

Also, their volume is ridiculously low, 52 LTC transacted in 24 hrs is not feasible for any sort of real purchasing.

I'd do a lot more research into this company before sending them a bank wire, or Dwolla, as it looks like they use it.

All my LTC purchases have been with BTC on BTC-e, after purchasing BTC on MtGox   (this was when MtGox was much more functional of course)