Thanks. Done. I didn't realize that I had a typo in my OP and was missing the www  🫢

Perhaps a quiz that looks strictly at financial behaviour without assuming crypto-specific knowledge is best? I find the use of terms like DeFi and cypherpunk very leading. One would assume, of course, that cypherpunks don't need to ask themselves these questions, for instance?

The very first question (if I select the middle ground starting point), should be avoided. What's a private key? Most normal people would stumble over the definition, and many who started with self custody probably don't know their private key (instead, know a seed phrase). Question #2 starts correctly.

I find this research very interesting, as it would be of help to beginners who find it difficult to set a wallet and also to save their seeds. As a result of this, many enthusiasts resort to keeping funds and assets with an exchange, which is very risky and has made many lose their assets to hacking and theft, as the case may be. I believe the outcome of this survey would also have of positive impact on the crypto community in the long run. However, I have tried taking part in the survey, but the link is not accessible. Have you removed it, or is there anything wrong?

I assume the update is yet to come? I've tried using your website with a beginner profile, and the questionnaire comes with pre-selected answers. I was thinking the pre-selected answers are the highest possible answers a beginner can choose at the beginning.

I got the recommendation to use collaborative multi-sig with the default option, too. I guess it's quite familiar since beginners probably have experience with a trusted provider to protect their wealth. That being said, how was the number calculated? There's quiete a big gap between each recommendation.

I am not sure, but it suggested me to use a custom multisig setup, which is good because it's not far from the reality. Of course I am not using this system only, but it's certainly a good thing that the quiz suggested me to do what I already do. It has some accuracy.

It's a good endeavour, don't get me wrong, but I can't think as a beginner very easily, because I 've already gone deep inside the rabbit hole. Perhaps some other users who think they are "beginners", could give a better answer.

I like the idea, but I think I still prefer this article: https://blog.lopp.net/how-to-back-up-a-seed-phrase/

It's essentially a detailed comparison of the standardised options that a bitcoiner has. It doesn't touch custom solutions, which is good because most of the times, a custom solution is dangerous.

I would also not recommend Ledger maybe only to users that need a decent hardware device that supports many blockchains. I don't think there are that many hardware wallets that support many coins, the list what Trezor supports is different from Ledger.

I wonder if it would be better to have the whole survey on the same page instead of having to click the next button each time for every couple of questions. What do you think?

It would be better to allow users to choose answers on their own, instead of pre-selecting answers for them.

I would also be careful with recommending anyone ledger closed source devices, and ledger model S stopped production.
Even old Trezor One is not good choice for multisig setup and I would not recommend it.

In my opinion, it is not a good idea to pre-select the answers to the questions based on the respondent's self-classification.

It introduces a bias because the respondent is likely to choose the answers that you have already chosen for them.

Without the bias, you would have the opportunity to compare the answers with the self-classification to gain more insight and to improve the analysis.

Yes, it seems there is no more season for altcoins as there always used to be. If there were to be a season for altcoins by now, they should have risen to a certain price. In fact, the way altcoins were trying to pump when Bitcoin’s price was leading to $100k shows that all these altcoins like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB and others would not be at the same price now. So, I also think there will be no new ATHs  for most altcoins. In fact, even those altcoins that reached ATHs are mainly from projects that just launched, not over a long period.

But the reason many altcoins will not reach ATHs again is that people are now wiser. Many altcoins are just a game, and if someone isn’t smart enough, they will be the ones used to cash out big bags. Also, I think the main cause of these altcoins not having solid investors anymore is that it seems the same big investors and developers are behind many of these projects. So, there are no more big funds to pump and later dump the coins and the and average and small investors
in crypto industry are now wiser and prefer projects where the risks are more consider,so them are now investing bitcoin.