Hi this one sounds promising. Can you give me the link to your whitepaper.

This is a very bad excuse for a project that wants to be known and attract as many people as possible. What's the point to open an ANN thread if "you" are not willing to interact and answer to anyone who shows interest? Plus that I don't see any connection between managing bounties and replying here.
Sorry to say it but for me (and I'm sure to others as well) an inactive thread from the team, isn't a project that will look or involve more.

Their should be a detailed explanation about the project in the announcement thread.You should included the team of the project and their destination.From that the investors come to know,the project is legit and invest their money.No one will invest single bucks without the proper acceptance.So you should included the roadmap to the thread.From the above command,I had found less active of team on a thread.It should be omitted to get good investors.

It looks like they are more focused on advertising and bounties than answering the question here. I don't know if they have social media manager or not. Still, they should have a representative here to answer some of our questions regarding their project as it looks more suspicious if they have not one representative here.

You missed my question, or perhaps it is better if I say you missed the point of my question. What I asked was, given we can roughly say your service is an ICO platform, there are a lot of similar platforms already circling around, and most didn't safeguard the buyers against projects that do rugpull. Unfortunately, neither did i find any of your feature that attempting to fight against this known issue. So what's improvement that you purpose that differentiate you from others?

In regards to your 1st and 2nd page of lightpaper (or was it onepager-divided-into-six? It's very short and not detailed), I'd like to point out that the barrier to entry of token early sale were not just the high minimum contribution or the composition of holders-and-short-term-traders. If any ICO projects from the past 4 years ever taught anyone, there is a huge risk of rugpull and scam projects, which lead to to an opinion that a project that's already --borrowing your words-- "months after an exchange listing" is safer, because reputable exchanges filter outs low quality projects, which usually has tendency to exit-scam. With this said, I didn's see any point covering this on the proposal of your project. I assume your project didn't propose any feature to fight this known issue? If so, then what's so different between you and other existing crowdfunding platforms?

Those team were online and active several days ago, but they prefer to take care of the bounty thread and their stakes instead of answering serious question here. Which, for me, is rather worrysome and questionable since they've hired a top BM so they should be more focused on their ann and leave the bounty thread to their BM


I'd like to direct you to my post above in regards to the reasons behind our delayed communication several posts above.

Our bounty is currently handled by Royse777 (who has done a phenomenal job in all aspects) on social media bounties. Our Youtube + blog bounty is handled internally at the moment.

However, I'll reiterate the problems we encountered.

We have a designated core team member tasked to handle communications and outreach going forward on BCT and other channels. Unfortunately, he was impacted severely by COVID and that delayed our response. This is sadly an ongoing issue. To give you some perspective, our team is international in multiple countries so it's still a prevalent problem.

Given that the bounty was live it was only fair for us to continue there for hunters.

For reassurance, the communication on BCT will be improved as well are now transitioning and expanding our team at the moment. I hope this is not exactly a deal-breaker for you, but I do sympathize with your concerns. I would too if the roles were switched. That's my honest answer.

However, knowing what I know I can say that we're here to stay and that there's nothing we're intentionally keeping from you. Hope this puts you at ease.



To answer your question here.

There are several dimensions here that need to be addressed:

1. We're referring to the price action of projects that have already been listed on exchanges and not the security of the project itself (more on that note in a minute). As we've witnessed, most of the time upon listing, the price spikes and drops partially by hype or bot issues. Binance and other centralized exchanges are no exception. However, purchasing a token via presale or public sale (early investment) generally protects against downside risks assuming a project is legitimate. Buying early and "cheaper" for say $1.00 on a presale deal before a token is live, will always be safer than buying $20 for the same token that's already listed. This is from a pure pricing perspective. I don't think there is much debate.

However, that brings us to...

2. The issue of finding out which projects are real, and which ones are the next rug pull is a real concern in this market. Our platform mitigates some of this security risk for investors by including liquidity and vesting token locks directly from the team. Therefore, any project that comes through us will be direct will be locked and optimized for safety for investors, and overall trust in the ecosystem. If a project wants to pull the liquidity from the project. Good luck there.

The vetting process will be done by us a combination of ourselves and via our community. Due diligence is important and not an area we plan to skimp out on.

3. In terms of how we're different from other solutions. Our value is in providing a complete launchpad that focuses on "creating deals' as opposed to "finding them" from other launchpads. Most others providers out there focus solely on funding and limited marketing. This is simply the wrong approach. Without revealing too much (until we show our MVP) we aim to dive deeper into this vertical. Essentially, really hammering down on the processes that streamline the launch sequence, including post-launch coordination for continued support. Why?

Well, what do you think happens when a project gets purchased by investors hoping to flip or sell all of their vested tokens for the next shiny object?

That's not real value and a problem faced by some other competitor launchpads. We plan to solve this via a combination of post-launch support from our partners, and our core technology.

Hope this answers some of the questions going forward.

can you share what is the different for membership level 1 to level 5?
because i search this info on your website but i don't find any benefit for each level

if they are going to collect some important details from the project owners who will apply on their platform, i believe it is only fair that they will also publish their team members on this project.
also, for added credibility of the platform itself. how can investors trust their money to anonymous platform? i know a lot of projects can pull it off without revealing themselves. but this is a fundraising platform. people will confidently send their money if they know who is/are behind the project.

Where is the information about the team? besides, is your project really connected to the Polkadot ecosystem and have several partnerships?
I like your thoughts on "Re-Inventing The Launchpad" this is a problem that occurs at this time.

Bitcointalk username: CaCO3
Video link: https://youtu.be/Ze7RIWILhqc