Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 53 results by WillowRosenberg
Re: [ANN] [CYPT] CryptCash | Quark PoW/PoS | Masternodes | Premine for PoB |
There's nothing here for new miners, just for old XNA-or-whatever holders.
No seed nodes on launch, source doesn't compile... Usual bull.
No seed nodes on launch, source doesn't compile... Usual bull.
Re: [ANN] [CYPT] CryptCash | Quark PoW/PoS | Masternodes | Premine for PoB |
PoW Info: Last Block is 10000
PoW Reward: 8 CYPT, No Halving
So total coins in POW is 80,000.
Masternode Payment Requirements: 17259.22 CYPT
So you need 21% of POW coins to run masternode?!
PoW Reward: 8 CYPT, No Halving
So total coins in POW is 80,000.
Masternode Payment Requirements: 17259.22 CYPT
So you need 21% of POW coins to run masternode?!
Not exactly, most coins are distributed through Proof Of Burn, not Proof Of Work....
The POW phase is a total waste. You could have skipped it and did your pre-mine in 1 block.
Re: [ANN] [CYPT] CryptCash | Quark PoW/PoS | Masternodes | Premine for PoB |
PoW Info: Last Block is 10000
PoW Reward: 8 CYPT, No Halving
So total coins in POW is 80,000.
Masternode Payment Requirements: 17259.22 CYPT
So you need 21% of POW coins to run masternode?!
PoW Reward: 8 CYPT, No Halving
So total coins in POW is 80,000.
Masternode Payment Requirements: 17259.22 CYPT
So you need 21% of POW coins to run masternode?!
1. Willow points out to the OP (fullintegrity) that there is something wrong at the github. (most probably Willow checked whether everything is ok with the coin after he handed the coin over to the OP):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9359231#msg9359231
2. The OP has not much experience with github and can't update it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9362504#msg9362504
3. Then the OP gets help (not from WIllow but from "pineapples"): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9364954#msg9364954
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9359231#msg9359231
2. The OP has not much experience with github and can't update it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9362504#msg9362504
3. Then the OP gets help (not from WIllow but from "pineapples"): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9364954#msg9364954
This is really over the top. A new coin is launched without the source code, and I point out this coin has no source code. Now I'm the dev.
Get a life dude.
Recently a sockpuppet account is revealed of Max Guevara (the creator of Quark): "WillowRosenberg"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg10331605#msg10331605
If you look at the post history of Willow Rosenberg you can find out that the creator of Quark is involved in more coins:
- Unobtanium (UNO)
- Joulecoin (XJO)
- Myriad (already suspected but confirmed now)
- Woodcoin (Willow is listed as the developer)
- Zetacoin (already suspected but confirmed now)
- Qcoin (dead after one week)
- Full Integrity coin (FIC) (also dead)
- ...
With Qcoin and FIC it seems that Willow created the coin for somebody else.
The following conversation is interesting at FIC:
1. Willow points out to the OP (fullintegrity) that there is something wrong at the github. (most probably Willow checked whether everything is ok with the coin after he handed the coin over to the OP):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9359231#msg9359231
2. The OP has not much experience with github and can't update it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9362504#msg9362504
3. Then the OP gets help (not from WIllow but from "pineapples"): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9364954#msg9364954
For me it seems that:
- "Max" / "Willow" is running a copy coin service, when I look to the Qcoin and FIC thread.
- Max/Willow works closely with DI (If I check the post history of "pineapples" it seems he is a sockpuppet account..of DI??) (not 100% sure but posts of "pineapple" are hard to read and he supports DI related coins):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=361576.msg4363417#msg4363417
Also "pineapples" posts to confuse readers.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg10331605#msg10331605
If you look at the post history of Willow Rosenberg you can find out that the creator of Quark is involved in more coins:
- Unobtanium (UNO)
- Joulecoin (XJO)
- Myriad (already suspected but confirmed now)
- Woodcoin (Willow is listed as the developer)
- Zetacoin (already suspected but confirmed now)
- Qcoin (dead after one week)
- Full Integrity coin (FIC) (also dead)
- ...
With Qcoin and FIC it seems that Willow created the coin for somebody else.
The following conversation is interesting at FIC:
1. Willow points out to the OP (fullintegrity) that there is something wrong at the github. (most probably Willow checked whether everything is ok with the coin after he handed the coin over to the OP):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9359231#msg9359231
2. The OP has not much experience with github and can't update it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9362504#msg9362504
3. Then the OP gets help (not from WIllow but from "pineapples"): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=837752.msg9364954#msg9364954
For me it seems that:
- "Max" / "Willow" is running a copy coin service, when I look to the Qcoin and FIC thread.
- Max/Willow works closely with DI (If I check the post history of "pineapples" it seems he is a sockpuppet account..of DI??) (not 100% sure but posts of "pineapple" are hard to read and he supports DI related coins):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=361576.msg4363417#msg4363417
Also "pineapples" posts to confuse readers.
Lol, now I am ocminer too, I'm honoured.
If you read my posts, e.g. QCoin, I was pointing out that it is a shitcoin with bugs in it. So now I'm the dev. Lol.
For Woodcoin I compiled a wallet because I wanted to use it on Windows and the dev didn't provide a wallet.
Unobtanium is Bryce Weiner's coin, so now I'm Bryce Weiner too. Lol.
You've gone full retard with your conspiracies.
P.S. I posted in Bitcoin threads too, so therefore I could be Satoshi!
And suddenly all the FUDers re-appear.
And your sock puppet account, eh Max?
Uh no, but that surely is one of your trolling accounts
fcking dev disappeared right from the bat
https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark/commits/master
Active 9 days ago
Wow Max did something at github
You know exactly what bitcoinnaked means...Max has never been fully engaged with Quark, the community and/or the projects for Quark. It was so bad that foundation members wanted to pay him to get him more engaged:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg10005860#msg10005860
If was pointing out the lie that Max abandoned the coin after release. Max is still updating the coin more than a year after release. Max has done a lot in Github more than most devs. That's what he's supposed to do: look after the Core Quark code.
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Can't get enough of those pictures!
Yeah, more people for my ignore list
fcking dev disappeared right from the bat
https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark/commits/master
Active 9 days ago
At the current hashrate of the coin , how many i7 processors it will take to do a 51%?
Few days ago you would have needed only 80M to perform a 51% attack, if someone had really been interested to knock down the network he could do that by temporarily ordering a few number of virtual machines. It would probably have costed less than 1000$. Even that was too much to perform an attack, noone cares.
The Hashrate hasn´t been that low since December 2013, still in December the situation was better because it wasn´t that centralized - even though it was really bad:
As you can read from this post the Hashrate of Coinmine in December 2013 was about 90%. Today it has 98.96% with 406M Hashrate (don´t believe it? click here). There is basically noone solo mining. Quark IS coinmine.pl.
Waiting for Digitalindustry or Hillux to come and claim that Quark is the best and most decentralized currency.
I´d be interested in an explanation how Quark could ever get away from being centralized at coinmine.pl
bump
congrats, looks like this coin has 2 full-power forks now:
https://www2.coinmine.pl/qrk/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocks
http://yaamp.com/site/block?id=305
Yaamp difficulty is 0.9, everybody else's difficulty is 900. Yaamp probably hasn't upgraded to the latest version.
Hm, are there connections between Maxcoin and Quark 
I thought those 2 coins didn't like each other very much
Since Maok joined it looks like Quark copies some projects from Maxcoin:
1.
The cryptobullion project at startcoin:
http://www.reddit.com/r/maxcoin/comments/29ebpl/maxcoin_silver_cryptobullion_startjoin_project/
(initiated by mako (or better known as mr solomon at maxcoin:P) http://forums.silverstackers.com/topic-57342-startcoin-silver-cryptobullion.html
And Quark also did an attempt:
http://quarktalk.org/threads/cryptobullion-minted-coins.236/
2.
And a new forum for Maxcoin; MaxTalk.org
http://www.reddit.com/r/maxcoin/comments/220xsd/ann_opening_of_the_official_maxcoin_community/
Didn't Quark also have its own forum what was the name.... QuarkTalk.org
I thought those 2 coins didn't like each other very much
Since Maok joined it looks like Quark copies some projects from Maxcoin:
1.
The cryptobullion project at startcoin:
http://www.reddit.com/r/maxcoin/comments/29ebpl/maxcoin_silver_cryptobullion_startjoin_project/
(initiated by mako (or better known as mr solomon at maxcoin:P) http://forums.silverstackers.com/topic-57342-startcoin-silver-cryptobullion.html
And Quark also did an attempt:
http://quarktalk.org/threads/cryptobullion-minted-coins.236/
2.
And a new forum for Maxcoin; MaxTalk.org
http://www.reddit.com/r/maxcoin/comments/220xsd/ann_opening_of_the_official_maxcoin_community/
Didn't Quark also have its own forum what was the name.... QuarkTalk.org
C'mon, I know you can come up with better conspiracy theories than this, I've heard some of them before.
Block reward: 10 QTC, no halving
Number of coins: Ten billion coins generated
Number of coins: Ten billion coins generated
If your block reward is constant your number of coins is infinite (don't say it is limited because you set MAX_MONEY).
Official wallets are compiled with J version of openssl, my wallets are compiled with L version of openssl.
Dev should update official wallets.
Probably not, see the top of this page "News"
Quote
News: ♦♦ Users of Bitcoin Core on Linux must not upgrade to the latest OpenSSL. More info. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=919373.0)
Re: [UNO] Unobtanium Info & Discussion - Current wallet 0.9.5
if we implement auxpow with btc we wouldn't have to sacrifice the 3-minute-blocks or would we?
no, uno can keep the 3 minute blocks.
Re: [UNO] Unobtanium Info & Discussion - Current wallet 0.9.5
The block times doesn't matter for merge mining.
A coin with a 10 minute block time can merge mine with a coin with a 1 minute block time.
A coin with a 10 minute block time can merge mine with a coin with a 1 minute block time.
so zet can merge and doesn't need change? This would be great news for both coins, wouldn't it?
Yes, the parameters doesn't need to change, but one of the coins must implement AuxPow.
If a coin has AuxPow it can merge mine with other coins that doesn't have AuxPow.
the one with Auxpow will get a large blockchain, correct?
Is there an estimate how big the bloat would potentially be?
Both coins get some extra data in their block chain. For the non-AuxPow coin it is a hash and for the AuxPow coin it is a block header and a hash. These aren't big chunks of data, probably not more data than an average transaction.
Re: [UNO] Unobtanium Info & Discussion - Current wallet 0.9.5
The block times doesn't matter for merge mining.
A coin with a 10 minute block time can merge mine with a coin with a 1 minute block time.
A coin with a 10 minute block time can merge mine with a coin with a 1 minute block time.
so zet can merge and doesn't need change? This would be great news for both coins, wouldn't it?
Yes, the parameters doesn't need to change, but one of the coins must implement AuxPow.
If a coin has AuxPow it can merge mine with other coins that doesn't have AuxPow.