Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 315 results by WinTame2012
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [23.5Th] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #
by
WinTame2012
on 14/09/2013, 23:37:11 UTC

Since you're not mining here and are not supporting the pool, please stop trolling this thread with your nonsense.

-wk
Very userfriendly and polite. "Even if you've mined and supported pool for along time before - you are used and owned, just GFY now."
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Incoming Avalon News 8/9/2013
by
WinTame2012
on 14/09/2013, 01:51:20 UTC
Maybe the Mail with the tracking numbers are stuck in (customs)proxy  Smiley

It's stuck in Limbo™
Post
Topic
Board Разное
Re: Встреча форумчан:) Украина
by
WinTame2012
on 14/09/2013, 01:41:41 UTC
WinTame2012, ну с погодой ещё не ясно, не сейчас же ехать...
Да, лучше подождать зимы Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [23.5Th] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #
by
WinTame2012
on 14/09/2013, 01:33:19 UTC
Huh?

Default payout, 0.17219640 BTC total, and it says this:

Code:
Estimated Position in Payout Queue
Approximately 0.00000000 BTC remaining to enter payout queue. Maintaining your 3 hour hashrate average, this will take at least another a few seconds at current network difficulty of 86933017.77.

It is the moment I've referred in my post about fixing the thing which is not broken. On the live pool. What a smart move, again.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [23.5Th] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #
by
WinTame2012
on 14/09/2013, 01:30:59 UTC
CPPSRB is a good system.
Definitely is. It costs me BTC2.51 to prove it is. I'm happy  Embarrassed
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [23.5Th] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #
by
WinTame2012
on 13/09/2013, 04:02:46 UTC
Wizkid,

I compared the 'Shares Rewarded' numbers with several random miner's workers who was below and above me in TOP-20 list. They all have 94% to 95%. And only my worker have 84% of shares rewarded. I want to emphasize that I haven't stopped mining till today's post and mined at a sustained rate for a week before.

I think during the manual payout routine you've underpaid my reward. Probably, by human error.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [23.5Th] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #
by
WinTame2012
on 13/09/2013, 03:50:33 UTC
Yes. Doing 'fixes' (of that wasn't broken) on the live pool was very smart move. The consequences followed quickly.
Enough is enough.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [23.5Th] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #
by
WinTame2012
on 13/09/2013, 01:49:58 UTC
Why shelved BTC amount was removed from stats? My unpaid balance started to grow from 7 Sep and now stuck at 2.51 BTC for the last 3.5 days while I still mine at a sustained rate 212 GH/s and pool was incredibly lucky yesterday.

Wizkid, please consider manual payout to address 18RHQfmrTcC5MXuFUMxC29W3VWRQtCuvV5.
Thanks.


There is nothing left to pay out on that address.  You're in queue for 0.16586020 BTC, which includes estimated payout for the current round/next block.  Although, it looks like you've removed the majority of your hash power, so, that will likely drop since you are no longer contributing and you're not adding as many shares and the current round is unlucky.  Under CPPSRB, constantly active miners will always end up with the best long term rewards.

Just a general note (to everyone, not just the person I'm replying to).  Please read the FAQ on the CPPSRB Reward System. Shelved shares are not ever owed by the pool in any way shape or form.  They are simply shares which were submitted, added to the share log, and have not yet had funds available to be paid (ie, luck).  Displaying Shelved Shares as a value in BTC turned out to be a mistake since too many people either assumed that they should be getting rewarded that amount, or would rage quit when, even though their % paid was high, would misunderstand the system and think that reward system was broken for not paying them for shelved shares.  Displaying the % of shares rewarded so far is a much more useful metric than a value of shares not yet rewarded.

The pool does not owe shelved shares.  The pool will pay as many shelved shares as possible when it is possible with every lucky block.  But, if there are not sufficient funds mined to go far enough into the share log to pay everyone, then obviously they can not be paid yet and they will sit in the share log (shelved) until such time as they can be rewarded/paid.

-wk
I just wonder how it can be that I had regular payouts with a little shares been shelved in days when pool wasn't very lucky and then, after the recent 'glitch in autopayout system', I've received only some teardrops even despite very lucky 24 hours? It can be obviously seen in the chart. Notice the almost absent green area before the 'glitch' (with much less lucky rounds) and an enormous shelved shares after that 'glitch'.

I'd better leave this cheting pool now.
.
Post
Topic
Board Разное
Re: Встреча форумчан:) Украина
by
WinTame2012
on 12/09/2013, 23:08:56 UTC
Джентльмены, какие горы? Какая природа?


Я голосую за Киев. Есть приятный кабак в самом центре, с большим залом, пока еще пустующим. Из приятного: вкусное безлимитное пиво по 50 грн. с лица и отличная кухня.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [23.5Th] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #
by
WinTame2012
on 12/09/2013, 21:44:30 UTC
Why shelved BTC amount was removed from stats? My unpaid balance started to grow from 7 Sep and now stuck at 2.51 BTC for the last 3.5 days while I still mine at a sustained rate 212 GH/s and pool was incredibly lucky yesterday.

Wizkid, please consider manual payout to address 18RHQfmrTcC5MXuFUMxC29W3VWRQtCuvV5.
Thanks.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [23.5Th] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #
by
WinTame2012
on 12/09/2013, 00:31:37 UTC
Thank you for prompt reply. I'm just a bit nervous on that.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [23.5Th] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 #
by
WinTame2012
on 12/09/2013, 00:26:44 UTC

I'm going to point to a different coin as a test but wanted to make sure I was in the payout queue first.

It' seems I've been waiting for 3 blocks to get in the queue, is that just a lag in the stats?



There was a small glitch in the new custom minimum payout code that caused the reward system to pause as a fail safe.  I'm working on it now and letting it catch up with the shares database so I can get everyone paid. Smiley

No worries!

-wk
Hi,

I found that despite the fact that pool was extremely lucky in the last 24 hours I've moved within payout queue from just 0.xx BTC before me to the 148+ BTC in front of me in queue. I have mined uninterrupted all the time. For Satoshis's sake How it could have happen? My payouts from Eligius almost stalled for two days now.


Is this reward lost?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Incoming Avalon News 8/9/2013
by
WinTame2012
on 09/09/2013, 20:44:28 UTC
Alright guys, got some good news, here's the two big ones.

1. chips from wednesday arrived just fine, they are being split/packaged for shipment.
2. we are going to open refund for all orders, not just june 1st/15th or what not.

expect more detailed update via newsletter later tonight.

Newsletter update was supposed to go out?  Did it?

I think it is being held in customs.
Customs just released the News Update Smiley
http://us5.campaign-archive2.com/?u=238a9ecd2e5192e3cd3ace26d&id=1a696dd59b
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Ripple Giveaway!
by
WinTame2012
on 09/09/2013, 04:06:41 UTC
rpYgpfGt5cYiADJweKhsfWLjGQVJQ5fBHn
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Incoming Avalon News 8/9/2013
by
WinTame2012
on 01/09/2013, 15:45:35 UTC
So where is my compensation for the issue with my 2 Avalon Batch 2 machines??

As a Batch 2 machine buyer i placed faith in you and the company... i got screwed to the tune of 130 BTC, due to your mistakes...

Where is my compensation? Seeing as you have "no problems compensation for delay", please compensate me for the delay.

Exactly same like B3 buyers - 2-3 months delay made our ROI pretty impossible.
Don't forget that there was another 2-4 weeks delay in (edit) Batch 3 units (/edit) shipping even after the 'refund-or-receive' offer, forced customers to decide in only 2 days. And that 4 weeks made a huge difference in breaking even the hardware as difficulty has ramped up a 90%.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Incoming Avalon News 8/9/2013
by
WinTame2012
on 01/09/2013, 01:27:20 UTC
You can't blame him for your greed, You are the one that choose to overpay

This is the same discussion as with the delayed chip delivery: if Yifu had stuck to his word and delivered on time, there would be no problem in breaking even (even if it took 4 months instead of the projected one month) but due to his procrastination, Batch #3 was delivered that late that it can't ever break even.

It has nothing to do with greed but Yifu keeping his word

+1
this issue of late batch #3 and impossible breaking even due to late delivery should also be adressed
+1
I thought about the same. It's impossible to break even with this 3+ moths delay. And it's definitely not 'ASIC on time' as it was advertised Sad
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Avalon orders - batch #3 refund requests thread
by
WinTame2012
on 29/08/2013, 02:29:12 UTC
ok. this is pretty stupid of me, and completely my fault.

the system is designed to move cold storage to hot wallet -> then send out refunds.

but apparently the move failed and the script tried to send a bunch of refunds while the input contained no coins...

1000 coins have been moved and script resumed, I'm sure people should see refunds instantly and can vouch. and once I get back on location I can enable more coins to be moved and thus refund resumed.

again, I apologize for the long delay.
Still got nothing. How long it can take to process all the refunds?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Guide] Comprehensive ASICMiner Blade Setup
by
WinTame2012
on 20/08/2013, 14:07:31 UTC
Hi
After reciving waranity replacment, i`m trying to work with new unit.
Works well at low with ~10500Mhash, but when i`ll switch to High, it stops working at all, or close to it.
After few minutes, reboots. At low works well for 16h in a row.

Any adwise? should i check voltage or smth ??
Start from checking for potential voltage drop on the green bracket when you switch to High.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Avalon ASIC users thread
by
WinTame2012
on 17/08/2013, 01:29:21 UTC
Moved from bitparking to 50btc and now I'm constantly getting a lot of Rejected shares at Diff8  Huh
Does anybody have fixed issue like this?

Edit: FW both 20130703 and 20130723

Change your diff to 64 on 50btc under settings for miner is probs why you getting too many rejected shares.

Thanks. Did it already. Looks like it helps.
No, that's not actually making it better unless there is an actual problem with the pool - which would mean don't use the pool.
Going from 8diff to 64diff simply means your Reject share variance increases.
Coz on average you find 1/8 of the rejected shares ... but they are worth 8 times as much each.
That's right. It's not a solution.

If 50BTC is using a large coinbase, you might have been getting struck by the excessive CPU usage limitation in older firmware just like p2pool was. This might manifest as duplicate shares and only show up as rejects at your pool. Most of the recent updates were created to address precisely that problem. Try my latest firmware.

http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/avalon/20130814/
Thank you, ckolivas. I'll consider to move to the new firmware as it gets mature. I just read the feedback that new FW are affected by the lower hashrate than 0703.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Avalon ASIC users thread
by
WinTame2012
on 17/08/2013, 01:24:06 UTC
Moved from bitparking to 50btc and now I'm constantly getting a lot of Rejected shares at Diff8  Huh
Does anybody have fixed issue like this?

Edit: FW both 20130703 and 20130723

Change your diff to 64 on 50btc under settings for miner is probs why you getting too many rejected shares.

Thanks. Did it already. Looks like it helps.
No, that's not actually making it better unless there is an actual problem with the pool - which would mean don't use the pool.
Going from 8diff to 64diff simply means your Reject share variance increases.
Coz on average you find 1/8 of the rejected shares ... but they are worth 8 times as much each.
I calculate it in the %age to accepted Diff64 shares. And it works. But 50btc is not ideal pool, I consider to move on.