Hey

I want to buy a US Bank Account with internet access. The account must have high limits on deposits and bank transfers. The account must be able to send transfers from the internet account.

Thank you!

your price is good, can you add better quality photos?

Nobody can grantee that, but I'm sure of that... Bitcoin will break $1000 barrier, it's just a matter of time (1-3 years). In this timeline we'll see a lot of price variations.

I am pretty sure the same people who are behind the accounts who have tried to get loans backed by AUM are probably all the same person (or group of people) and this person/group of people are likely somehow connected to the dev's of AUM, if not the devs themselves.

I enrolled a long time ago, but it doesn't look like you have added me yet. I checked the rules and I don't see anything that would disqualify me and you have plenty of open spots.

I don't think theymos is going to give any explanation regarding the rejection. A thread was opened shortly after the bid was rejected asking about the rejection and he never responded in the thread.

They were able to return additional funds to investors because they were not a ponzi in a sense that there was no real hardware actually mining. The fact that they actually had hardware mining meant that they were able to payout whatever it earned (minus their fees) to shareholders/investors).

There were posts that had mentioned that either ASICMINER or AMHASH was having difficulty selling all of their mining power that AMHASH1 was supposed to be backed by. So it is possible that he decided that it would not be financially viable to continue running his company so he just stole everything that he could from his customers.

This goes to show why it is not good to ever own miners that you do not physically control as it will always be trivial for whoever physically controls your miners to steal them and to steal whatever mining revenue that your miners should generate

Sorry to bring this thread back to life, but maybe theymos had received either subpoena or other legal process related to bitmixer in the past (or more likely shortly prior to them bidding on the forum auctions).

If bitmixer was recently (as of when the OP was created) then it would make sense for them to want to advertise more in order to attract more illicit business. 

Here is a crazy thought. Maybe BurtW is behind bitmixer.io (or at least the government thinks he is behind it). I think running a bitcoin mixing service (some may call this a laundering service) could possibly fit the description of the allegation in the indictment.

BurtW did more or less publicly endorse bitmixer in their announcement thread and said that he had used them for 'a large amount' of bitcoin when they were only a few months old. He even said that he was considering to invest in them, and their minimum investment is 100 BTC.

BurtW was arrested on October 14, 2014, and bitmixer's forum auction bid was rejected by theymos without explination on December 7, 2014 (only 3 weeks later). This would fit a timeline of theymos getting some kind of subpoena asking for information about both the bitmixer.io account and the BurtW account, and if bitmixer.io was compromised as part of the arrest, it would fit the rough timeline that it would take for the government to take over the service and familiarize themselves with a good way to track all the coins that pass through it.

What does not match is the dates on the indictment (it says from April 2013, and bitmixer created a bitcointalk thread in January 2014), although it is possible that government thinks he was behind bitmixer + some other mixing service or + something else.

All this of course is speculation

You are kidding right? Investors have not been paid in close to two months, and the people behind AMHASH have not received any mining revenue for close to another month before that. This is despite the fact that investors should have been receiving mining revenue for that entire time.

I am really not sure how else you could see that FC is a thief and a scammer

FC has been offline for almost two months now. When someone scams, they almost always will never allow you to hear from them again.

Instead of giving himself a raise prior to the company failing, he simply stole the mining equipment and mining revenue of AMHASH. It is as simple as that

Well not accepting bitcoin will increase Apmex's cost so they should be charging higher prices, not lower ones. It would not be difficult to sell bitcoin and then use a credit card to buy on Apmex and get 1% cash back (with a rewards card) - the reason credit cards are so expensive to use is because there are hidden charges in the forum of higher prices that merchants needs to pay in order to make up for them themselves paying high fees.

Granted it is a free market, however I don't think your argument that you use to backup your prices is valid. 

Each confirmation on the litecoin network is much less secure and less certain to actually be included in the litecoin blockchain. Additionally the litecoin network has a much lower hashrate, so it would take a lot less for someone to attack it.

For both of the above reasons even having one confirmation on the litecoin network is generally less secure then having a 0/unconfirmed transaction on the bitcoin network

generally speaking, a well propagated transaction, with a 'proper' tx fee that does not spend any unconfirmed inputs should be considered to be "safe" after only a few seconds on the bitcoin network

Based on this thread, and based on other BTC/CLAIM trading threads, it appears that BAC is a pillar of free market economics. From what I can tell, he is willing to find the right buyer who wants to buy at any price and is patient enough to find a seller who needs to sell at any price.

From the looks of it BAC has made at least a small fortune doing this

I personally do not think anything good (for bitcoin) will ever come out of any kind of bitcoin related heist.

There have been several calls immediately after previous heists for the fungibility of bitcoin to somehow decline, generally speaking via the call for the bitcoin that was stolen to be made impossible by the miners to ever be spent. The fact that additional government regulation is coming into the bitcoin world, in theory this could actually happen which would likely lead to the ultimate failure of bitcoin

Name              : Window2Wall
Position           : Full member
Bitcoin Address : 1HxswymAFSgr4hfDgM1DykhH8GuBBodsf3
Posts              : 177
Link to stat      : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=356718;sa=statPanel

My guess is -2.51 to -2.75%

Lets see how this goes

I got my payment as well (was confirmed in block 339588), thank you.

If we need to reenroll my current post count is 175 and my address is the same of 1HxswymAFSgr4hfDgM1DykhH8GuBBodsf3

Thanks again

This is really not 100% accurate. You will only actually validate (confirm) a transaction if you actually 'find' a block at which point you will most likely (depending on your, or your pool's policy on transactions) confirm several hundred (if not thousand) transactions.

If you do not find any blocks then you will not validate/confirm any transactions.

With stratum, your connection speed really does not matter (to a point). The stratum protocol will allow you use very little bandwidth even for a very large mining farm.

As long as you are using a wired internet connection that is considered "broadband" by modern standards you should be fine