Search content
Sort by

Showing 16 of 16 results by Windrunner88
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Earth’s Greatest Threats
by
Windrunner88
on 19/08/2018, 10:52:35 UTC
I think the problems in the world are directly related to the rate of growth of mankind on earth - and this is the main reason. Man destroys nature from that and all these cataclysms described in National Geographic. Just think about these numbers.
During the first 500 years of the second Millennium, The world's population has increased by about 1.5 times, the second - 12 times, and only in the last - the 20th century - almost 4 times. The acceleration in population growth is well reflected in the number of years in which the World's population has increased by 1 billion inhabitants. Such C show that the population of the Earth has reached the population:

in 1 billion people - in 1820, i.e. in the history of its development;

2 billion people in 1927 - after 107 years,

3 billion people in 1960 - 33 years later,

4 billion people in 1974 - after 14 years,

5 billion people in 1987 after 13 years,

6 billion people in 1999 - 12 years later.

As you can see, the accumulation of the first billion inhabitants of the Earth took several tens of thousands of years, while the 6th billion of them appeared in the last 12 years.

Thus, the 20th century was the period of the fastest growth of the world population. The General accumulation of the human mass was pushed by the entry of an increasing number of countries into the period of sharply expanded reproduction of the population-the demographic revolution
Yes, a lot of these problems have been exaggerated due to the population growth. I would just like to point out though that birthrates are going down. The growth is slowing down. We hit 7 billion in 2011, so another 12 years passed. The world population is not actually growing exponentially. The growth will continue to slow. We'll actually have some problems of underpopulation in some places. I think we're gradually becoming more responsible for how we're treating the Earth and we're getting better at it.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: why do people agree to pay taxes?
by
Windrunner88
on 18/08/2018, 18:22:51 UTC
Tax money goes to the country's budget
The budget is spent on different needs, in different countries in different ways, for example:

  • financial support of law enforcement bodies of the state
  • the maintenance of state institutions (hospitals, schools, orphanages, etc.)
  • ensuring the security of the state, in particular the maintenance of the army
  • financing of state programs
  • the content of the state administration apparatus (payment of salaries to civil servants)
  • construction and improvement of social facilities and territories
  • pension provision


Without taxes, the budget will not be replenished and your country will fall apart

Do you want chaos in your country?
Many people would argue that the private sector would do much better at a lot of these things than the government does. Thus, not having the government provide all these services would not necessarily result in chaos. It may result in the government itself becoming much smaller and less powerful. Imagine pizza delivery, for example. It's a great service that is often convenient to have. Do you think the government should take over pizza delivery. Everybody can have their pizza delivered for free. It'll just come out of our tax money. Most people would find that strange. It's better just to pay for pizza delivery if you actually order a pizza. We can argue a similar thing about just about all the services the government offers. Why are we paying for everything if we don't use it.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: why do people agree to pay taxes?
by
Windrunner88
on 16/08/2018, 17:45:08 UTC
People pay taxes only because they're forced to, threatening to use force to resist.
There are those who say that they pay taxes voluntarily.
It is difficult for people to admit that they pay taxes only for fear of retaliation from the representatives of the state. It was hard for me to admit it to myself. I don't steal not because I'm afraid of going to hell or prison, but because I understand that stealing is bad. What's the difference with taxes? To tell a person that he pays taxes only because he is afraid that he will be caught and punished means to admit that he is bad. It's very uncomfortable, people want to be good. That is why it is important for the representatives of the state that everyone thinks that paying taxes is good
I agree that people pay taxes because they are afraid of what will happen if they don't. I think on some level paying taxes may be good. You can even feel good about paying them. For me though, I see so many time when tax money is misused by the government that it makes me think that I don't really want to give them any more of my money to waste. I'm grateful for many of the services the government provides, but, for the most part, I don't trust them with my money. Most people I know will pay as little taxes as possible, given the chance. I think that's only natural.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Earth’s Greatest Threats
by
Windrunner88
on 11/08/2018, 14:58:52 UTC
There's countless threats to earth but just to put a different spin on it, I'll leave you with a quote from Robert Swan who said:

"The greatest danger to our planet is the belief that someone else will save it."

It shouldn't be just environmentalists saving our planet, every person should do more. When we finally wake up and realize that war is not the answer, then instead of recruiting troops for a mandatory service of 1year +, every country could recruit young people to go on environmental missions. I've always believed traveling is one of the most awarding things we can do on this planet. If each and every young person were given the opportunity to learn and travel the world, while saving our planet, we could actually make a difference.

That's a great quote! Thanks for sharing. That actually reminds me of another quote. I think it goes along with yours. Google tells me the quote is attributed to Hillel first- century Jewish scholar, “If not you, then who? If not now, when?” People definitely need to think more about the role they play in the world. The mandatory volunteer service could be interesting. I think that Germany has some kind of option like that instead of the military.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Earth’s Greatest Threats
by
Windrunner88
on 10/08/2018, 11:07:15 UTC
It appears terrorism is the greatest threat facing humanity now.
You are really mistaken. Terrorism is horrible, but it is nowhere near the greatest threat we're facing. How about some statistics for you:
Quote
    – You are 17,600 times more likely to die from heart disease than from a terrorist attack

    – You are 12,571 times more likely to die from cancer than from a terrorist attack

    — You are 11,000 times more likely to die in an airplane accident than from a terrorist plot involving an airplane

    — You are 1048 times more likely to die from a car accident than from a terrorist attack

    –You are 404 times more likely to die in a fall than from a terrorist attack

    — You are 87 times more likely to drown than die in a terrorist attack

    – You are 13 times more likely to die in a railway accident than from a terrorist attack

    –You are 12 times more likely to die from accidental suffocation in bed than from a terrorist attack

    –You are 9 times more likely to choke to death on your own vomit than die in a terrorist attack

    –You are 8 times more likely to be killed by a police officer than by a terrorist

    –You are 8 times more likely to die from accidental electrocution than from a terrorist attack

    – You are 6 times more likely to die from hot weather than from a terrorist attack
Source: https://www.infowars.com/statistics-show-you-are-not-going-to-be-killed-by-terrorism/

These numbers are for American citizens I believe, but they even include deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq. The number will differ from country to country, but not that much. There are so many more things to worry about than terrorism. The governments wants you to be scared of terrorism, so they take more of your rights away and distract you from their corruption.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: What do you think about immortality?
by
Windrunner88
on 08/08/2018, 14:30:03 UTC
What do you think about immortality? Will people find immortality in the future?
Is it possible to transfer a digital copy of the brain to a computer environment?

Immortality in the sense of a digital copy is not true immortality. It is more along the lines of cloning. For instance, think of an organic human as a vinyl record and the digital copy as an mp3. For the most part you can say there is no distinguishing differences yet, the mp3 does not log all the dings, scratches and every other error present in the original. Just as when you copy any file on a computer it is not the original file, but a copy.

If your goal is to continue yourself from the state you were at when you died, then yes, that will suffice. The problem is, it isn't you. You still died. So you feel nothing. Your copy is what will experience the world after you die. Just as when you make a clone of say a dog, you know it is not your actual dog, but a clone of it. There is no difference from a dog and a person when you are copying its data. Both had an original and both have a copy.

The main problem is how we are created. Humans as they are now will never be immortal. But, if you follow the beliefs of tranhumanism, eventually humanity and technology will meld together until there is a point where there is no distinguishing difference between the two. Those of us born before that time will be doomed to die. After that phase though, humans will be created in a digital environment, so technically they would live forever as they do not have to deal with organic flaws. They would also not be classified as Homo Sapiens, or from the viewpoint of some, not human at all.

Also, I've always thought that if reincarnation is real then there is no reason to find immortality. You technically already are. You just don't stay in the same state forever. Which sounds more fun than watching the world pass by as the same person or thing.
I guess one of the first questions would be what your definitely of immortality. On Wikipedia, I found this, "Physical immortality is a state of life that allows a person to avoid death and maintain conscious thought." If you could actually upload your mind and have it function in some sort of computer, maybe the trick is just the transition. If you upload it and your copy starts "living" and thinking it's own thoughts separate to you, then you would die and the copy would live on. It would be distinctly different. If you died, then somebody turn on the save copy of you, you'd be dead and the train of conscious thoughts would be interrupted. Your copy would just go back to the time when it was uploaded. If you you could get it just right, so that your brain is uploaded while you were dying, you could get the effect of a continued train of thought. The body would die, but the mind would just move into the computer and keep working.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: Hard times
by
Windrunner88
on 07/08/2018, 06:53:30 UTC
Hi all.......need a bit of advice really.

I invested quite a bit of money in a number of ICOs back in December when bitcoin was pretty high and I initially made quite a bit of money but since the bear market started and continued I'm down a few thousand.

I can't bring my self to sell any of my coins due to an attachment I have with them. So it looks like I'm.going to be holding a bit longer.

Any advice on any coins that might be worth day trading to recoup a bit of money back as every coo  I choose to invest in seems only to go one way..

Many thanks
I don't think anybody can give you specific advice as to what to do with your money. In the end, each person has to take responsibilities for their own investments. You talk about an attachment you have to your coins. This sounds like emotion. You should work to remove emotion from your trading. Set specific rules for yourself, so you know what you will do when something happens. Make some if-then rules for yourself. For example, "if this coin drop by this much, I'll trade it for another". There's no point in keeping coins that constantly depreciate in value, for example.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: 200 USD To Visit To Iran, If You Can Meet With Iran President Hassan Rouhani
by
Windrunner88
on 06/08/2018, 17:50:51 UTC
How much you would pay for visit to Iran and also meet with its president Hassan Rouhani to discuss some international politics questions ? I think 200 USD would be max price, without airplane tickets and visas.
I don't know that much about the political situation in Iran. I have no desire to mean with the president of Iran. I would love to visit the country though. How did you come up with this hypothetical scenario? You think the president may start having meeting for money? Maybe he'll auction off his time to foreigners? Not counting flights and visas, I guess I could spend a few hundred dollars more to visit Iran. I don't know why that would be necessary, but I could see myself paying it. I have heard so many good things about Iran and it's people.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Do you Think we Are alone in the Universe?
by
Windrunner88
on 04/08/2018, 16:24:03 UTC
It seems like a funny thing for people to assume. Why should we think we are so special that in all the galaxies in the universe there is no other intelligent life out there? If life came to be on this planet, it could definitely happen on other planets. There are so many billions of stars out there. Every star could be a sun for other planets. It's totally possible that we will never find other intelligent life out there, but that definitely doesn't necessarily mean that it doesn't exist.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Why are some countries still so rich and others so poor
by
Windrunner88
on 01/08/2018, 13:30:48 UTC
actually it all depends on the leader of the country. if the leader of a country has a goal to advance the country, no matter what happens it will be done for the welfare of its people. if the leader of a country is silent without any definite purpose the country becomes poor
What about the fact that the people choose the leader? Couldn't we say that the leader's views should be a reflection of the population? Or at least of the majority of the population? I guess this would only be applicable in democratic countries. What do you think "silent" leaders do? If they don't have ambitions for the country, then why do they want to be politician? I think it's usually that they have some personal ambitions. They don't care much if the country gets richer, but they do care if they get richer themselves.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Why are some countries still so rich and others so poor
by
Windrunner88
on 31/07/2018, 12:38:04 UTC
Why are some countries still so rich and others so poor?
Actually, the question is interesting. Really, with all the technology that we have now, why countries are still poor?
We have improved our health care system and people are still unable to cure themselves. Moreover, in some countries, they die and suffer from strange diseases.
 About education, well, so many are still without degrees. Why? Why people can't just go to college and get an education? Is it so hard to learn basic economics rule and become rich? Moreover, the world is really divided. Different religions, different theories. We have developed many sectors but we still have work to do.
What about war, prostitution and migration?
Actually, to tell the truth, it seems that all the problems of the world are needed. The elite needs it to feel better or to be superior.


Migration is definitely a big issue that I didn't think about. There's something called brain drain. The exaggerates the problem poor countries are already faced with. Whenever truly smart and talented people come up in a poor society, they have to make a decision. Usually poor countries can't provide them with a worthy salary. This leads so many people to leave those countries. They leave poor countries and go to rich people. This was the poor countries are left with less qualified people. The rich countries keep getting the best of the best and they just get richer.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: International sports competition
by
Windrunner88
on 30/07/2018, 14:02:35 UTC
Business! Yes, we read it. The reason is business. I know that athletes compete not for money but for glory. Is that true? it is hard to prove. Today, sport and business are very alike. First, international competition was meant to keep peace between nations, to push people to be feet. It is a good thing to build bridges between nations. From the Greek with their Olympic games to the Romans, sport has always played a good role in history. However in modern time, it has been used as a machine to corrupt or to make money. Big money in sport has caused a lot of harm. Remember the FIFA scandal? We always knew they were corrupted, but not so much. However I believe international competition is good and a smart way to bring people together and to push athletes to higher results.
I agree. Sports on the international level are unquestionable about money. Especially when it comes to FIFA of the Olympics. It's all about who will spend more money to get the Olympics in their country with the hope that they will be able to generate more revenue in their country by hosting the games. Then the whole event is about advertising and sponsorships. It was so surprising to hear about the fines during the World Cup. Many teams were fined tens of thousands of dollars for things like wearing the wrong socks or drinking the wrong water. Everything has to be what the sponsors paid for.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: International sports competition
by
Windrunner88
on 27/07/2018, 15:47:05 UTC
I don't think most people do sports to cultivate friendship in the world as many people here are suggesting. People to sports to test their limits, to see how good they can get at something. They start to wonder, "Maybe I'm the best in my town?" Then they organize a competition in their town to see who's the best. Then this grows to a state/regional/provincial level, then a national level. At some point, a sport get popular enough in the world that a couple countries get together and decide to see whose country is best. At some point you get events like the Olympics or the Pan-Am games, where an organization decides to gather many sports together and see whose country is best. I think the main reason for the organization of it all is financial gain.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Why are some countries still so rich and others so poor
by
Windrunner88
on 26/07/2018, 07:13:02 UTC
This mostly has to do with government policy. It seems like wherever there is a loophole, somebody will use it. If companies can find a way to take advantage of a law or policy, then they will. Their main goal is to make money. That seems to often be the goal of politicians too, personal gain. Often these businessmen get together with the politicians and come to agreements where they both get richer. The politicians of rich countries make laws that let the businessmen pay less taxes or receive different subsidies. The politicians of poor countries make laws that allow (often) foreign businessmen to take advantage of their resources and people. For this the politicians get some cut for themselves. It mostly comes back to corruption.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: How much does colour influence us when we buy something?
by
Windrunner88
on 25/07/2018, 16:19:13 UTC
I definitely think that colors influence us. One of the most fascinating things to me is that different colors have different connotations in different cultures. In some countries red may symbolize communism, in others it may connote danger. Apparently in India red is associated with purity. I would say that in Western culture white would be associated with purity. In China, white means deaths or mourning. That would be black in my culture. All of these factors play a role in advertising and packaging.

Check out this list of the meanings of colors: https://www.lifewire.com/visual-color-symbolism-chart-by-culture-4062177
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Earth’s Greatest Threats
by
Windrunner88
on 24/07/2018, 13:29:35 UTC
I think that environmental issues are the biggest threat. The Earth's population has grown very rapidly over a relatively short period of time. Along with population growth, technology has improved in leaps an bounds! This has required and allowed us to produce way more than we did before. We are generating so much pollution and waste. I think this is the biggest issue we're dealing with, though I think many countries are already making great progress to improve the situation. I hope we will see good solutions to combat this threat throughout the world. I heard that McDonald's is testing non-plastic straws and they might introduce them worldwide eventually.