One really did think that FIRE could have evolved into something great with the right coders, only a hardware guy & GIT IT of networks way 2 many times over the year for thy own good    Should have learned TED network specials, still trying 2 & not really 1 toooo give up on seeing what possible good outcomes could be of the NAME 

~Testing Applications @ before 2010 or beyond 

fonzerrellie,

   INot the best carry, have been a 10.0 (repair) support for many years now & like thy told cecilbdemented in the past.. It would always be about GIT IT out in circulation, some give all till they have nothing left 2 pick IT back up alone @ 2020 BTC 

// made a pledge to Techcoin & will keep it to the best of ones ability

   Actually would be the first client tested to secure the network with giving the 1% network fee to anyone online (others have tried similar test, not many have Given to the community), have watched a few tests of launches where the distribution was over the network & then they open sourced the github (over a year ago, Miraclecoin I think it was & a random node distribution or airdrop as they say). That's just the most recent one to remember, but have seen many launches of these chains & do understand which ones will last if secured right. When you can see a machine or mechanism, power it on & test it's usability. That would be just what one has seen over the many years of testing hardware & software, great to have the big powerful machines. Just not great to have to replace or repair said structures, the world would always take old concepts & replace them with smaller designs (big & loud = fun, but when you can git the same = out of nano sized)  

//not the best @ info graphic or videos (have tried) type work (find someone to volunteer), but am {git} great @ reading / editing BBcode for the ANN / OP (coder keys?)  

   Just have the application open on your desktop, the network will send out 2Give to random nodes online & each user sending will airdrop to anyone else on the network (might be calculated to node online longest or random?). Actually something quite new to past testings, but could be kind of like the master node name used in others coins?

   There have been 1000's of launches over the years, someone just posted in the Tenebrix thread & brought back some memories of all the readings over the years. Give it time, there will be many distributions over the duration of being on the forum & not always git to keep up with busy population of code world. Have to say that the faucets of the past & current are quite better, but so would the first users of alts GUI (just tested another simple wallet like the first of bitcoin, so glad we are past those days & have something people can actually use in realtime).

//wallet has to be clean, suprnova has a pool up & has testing 4 times the sources than most have
Great looking OP dev, being one who has spend much time learning BBcode & take great pride when seeing a well built 1 

   Yes, they could be cold storage & or lost on exchanges. 30k would be the online Firecoins helping the network & the open market would be part of the calculation threw CryptoID explorer. Current market value seems right (more volume would be ok though & help community development), unless Firecoin keeps development going (frequent updates) & not just let an app sit. There will always be better code, years of hearing the saying "if it is not broken" & that defeats the purpose of improvement of everything (blueprint of the world). Everything improves in time with new additions, but still the same prototype if you will type design & not some broken saying of how not to keep improving the world of creation through ideas of improvement  

//have tested many alternatives to BTC, many have good & bad or pro & con type calculations to them (specifications if you will)
~they all how ever can be built into something great if coded for the right thing, many lack purpose still & being only a hardware guy make it tough to keep IT going (code can always improve).

//Testing doesn't use PGP

---

//Real ID (after 2013 lost account)

PM sent for free testing distribution, thanks

yep yep, 1/1000's of tests to the ones who have control over development & or can afford to keep IT working

//1,000,000 ADT home safety nets stuck on Cryptsy, IT be all just tests & many fail the software world of making IT

One of the best pools out there, Suprnova has testing many of coins & never failed thy yet {@ first glance}

Really, you lead them to food & water then  

//just kidden, Simon says over & out  

{we all can't hide behind the machines, some have to GO 4th}

http://marvel.wikia.com/wiki/Slugger_Sokolowski_(Earth-616)

 
people read, no way 

//and I thought people just followed others around for info 

When do CEO's ever write documentations, none that I've ever heard of & seems that's why griffith created the ANN w/ A OP D? You wouldn't want a CEO to even try to write up a post on BitCoinTalk, unless it's one of those skills of all trades (writing major) & the lawyer is also the CEO

//good luck Griffith, watched some of your other work with ECC, MCW & SUPER

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cpay/
Block Height   Age
1617   27 days 3 hours


P.S. {if} you need some help with the code of the ANN (BBcoding), would be willing to help & not worry about being a "fallguy" 

account from 2010, surely you have many years of experience in these applications & do agree with the users of applications are unlike any other time in history

//will watch, might join in & just need time to see {if} 6+ years knowledge will make a difference in the outcome of success

Thought the same thing, so many coins & so many names to remember 

//easy to keep up with the Big Names, but tough to keep up with the New Names & have to be very skilled in fast paced readings of forum posts or miss the train / plane (insert U missed the train meme) 

 

//no fudster here, been around since before Bittrex & lots of goodie memories (Mintpal, ShareX , CryptoRush, Gotx & many more)

//just have to know where to look:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/nav/#!overview

Date / Time    Blocks    Height    Interval    Transactions    Value Out    Difficulty    Generated+Fees
2016-08-01 Mon   258   227536   -   42   48,665,538.957 NAV   128.5 k ± 38%   164.41506726
2016-07-31 Sun   2876   227278   30.0   211   29,857,049.645 NAV   182.1 k ± 79%   22,134.54464336
2016-07-30 Sat   2820   224402   30.6   388   3,456,588.964 NAV   183.0 k ± 72%   1,609.25615031
2016-07-29 Fri   2817   221582   30.7   138   2,365,714.514 NAV   152.9 k ± 73%   2,574.14026
2016-07-28 Thu   2835   218765   30.5   178   7,172,847.982 NAV   136.1 k ± 69%   1,756.2361505
2016-07-27 Wed   2807   215930   30.8   207   29,706,798.875 NAV   135.6 k ± 79%   3,115.53053435
2016-07-26 Tue   2519   213123   34.3   288   9,583,251.797 NAV   76.0 k ± 100%   5,384.32313826
2016-07-25 Mon   2790   210604   31.0   514   7,352,562.681 NAV   282.9 k ± 100%   1,769.83642457
2016-07-24 Sun   2832   207814   30.5   117   2,185,436.171 NAV   520.2 k ± 56%   1,384.47943812
2016-07-23 Sat   2803   204982   30.8   134   5,261,352.305 NAV   497.5 k ± 60%   1,358.41930107
2016-07-22 Fri   2799   202179   30.9   193   1,890,486.126 NAV   412.8 k ± 54%   1,531.36423266
2016-07-21 Thu   2790   199380   31.0   78   7,294,642.758 NAV   419.1 k ± 52%   1,411.27382176
2016-07-20 Wed   2821   196590   30.6   71   3,953,999.669 NAV   510.1 k ± 60%   1,717.74984892

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/nav/#!extraction
//Staking Coins for the last 1000 Blocks = Coin in Circulation @ 9 million NAV or 15% 

That's quite the GUI update to the original XDE, when it only had what 20 coins & the coin was swapped within a month of launch. Mined it & then turned around to see it was swapped a few times, but no worries... I've tested 1000's, not able to keep up with the uncertain swaps & still remember all the hype about being a rare Eagles coin

P.S. Do like the GUI updates, but really tough to follow all the new alternatives out & not miss out on swaps. Will keep in mind for there are many basics still out there with well valued markets in need of GUI updates to make it more basic user functional. Even some of the newest alternatives start with 5 year old General User Interfaces

Out of the 1000's of the tested alternatives to BitCoinTalk years BTC    
*very stable network (High Peers, Low Orphans)
*2GIVE .dat that starts with only 32kb (1000's of past experiments starting with 64kb+)
*28.1 MB roaming folder (embed-able, not like 1GB+ of 1000's of alts)
*The PoW earns for those helping the chain, PoS keeps it stable & tx's are instant
*OpenSSL 1.0.2d 9 Jul 2015 (1.0.2h and 1.0.2i) //Changes between 1.0.2g and 1.0.2h [3 May 2016]
*Custom Names, Url, Email, Etc...
*hashmeter   4 CPUs      7 khash/s <(efficiency @ it's best, real efficiency)>

Thanks SoopY, as I've watched NAV & many more for years, also trust+ BlockChain more than SSL. Mostly because BlockChain would be everything, like a self sustainable operating system & or the entire future of software

http://distrowatch.com/
Things One watches everyday = Latest Packages

//wish they would add this to http://cryptocoin.cc/table.php?cryptocoin=navcoin as well