Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 180 results by XEPBAM
Re: [ANN][CLOAK]CloakCoin Private,Secure,Untraceable & Decentralized Cryptocurrency
thanks for your feedback.
...
our next wallet releaes will come in ~1 month with the following updates:
1. allow user to specify posa timeout time.
2. add level-db for blockchain database
3. change all references from PoSA to Enigma
4. add debug messages when a node bans another node. (important for dev to improve enigma module.
5. some bugfixes
6. blockchain downloader improvments
...
...
our next wallet releaes will come in ~1 month with the following updates:
1. allow user to specify posa timeout time.
2. add level-db for blockchain database
3. change all references from PoSA to Enigma
4. add debug messages when a node bans another node. (important for dev to improve enigma module.
5. some bugfixes
6. blockchain downloader improvments
...
I am a little confused that promise ~1 month already turned into almost ~3, or i am bad at math?
Re: [ANN][CLOAK]CloakCoin|X13|PoSA3|CloakShield|Trustless Anonymous|Security Audit
Quote
On the development side we have a PoSA3 wallet version 2.0 and feel confident its ready for release.
Release will be announced on Cloakcoin's thread as usual.
Release will be announced on Cloakcoin's thread as usual.
So, and when we shall see PoSA3 wallet version 2.0, soon or maybe very soon?
And what changes in new wallet version?
Re: [ANN][ONEC]Project One|OneCurrency|OneMarket|OneMobile|PoSA3 Trustless Anonymous
cloakcoin topic now unlocked and old version cloakcoin.com work, so what does it mean, can not understand anything 
its already unlocked from starting and its never locked when announced about OneCurrency
and its happening something very huge stay tuned and even i also do not know what is happening 
nope, i subscribed to topic, and received email when was new posts and when topic locked :
14 July Topic locked: [ANN][CLOAK]CloakCoin|X13|PoSA3|CloakShield|Trustless Anonymous|Security Audit
14 September Topic unlocked: [ANN][CLOAK]CloakCoin|X13|PoSA3|CloakShield|Trustless Anonymous|Security Audit
Re: [ANN][ONEC]Project One|OneCurrency|OneMarket|OneMobile|PoSA3 Trustless Anonymous
Project alive or this is the end, I did not follow the coin for a long time, any information
Anonymous coins are now in the trend, this rebranding missed a chance to express themselves for this coin, very very very sad
Anonymous coins are now in the trend, this rebranding missed a chance to express themselves for this coin, very very very sad
Re: [ANN][CLOAK]CloakCoin|X13|PoSA3|CloakShield|Trustless Anonymous|Security Audit
Hi
Yes, it's pretty...
But once again, you loose time with details.
https://bchain.info/CLOAK/ was good enough for now.
The only ultra priority thing the last Cloak believers are asking for, is the final PoSA3 anonymous working wallet, supposed to be "almost 99% finished" since beginning August, if I remember good.
No surprise prices crashes...
Sorry to write that, don't want to hurt, but it's only a fact that everybody can clearly see : the pattern of promised product release and communications is almost identical as what happened in Summer & Autumn 2014, with "Cloak 1.0" and "Cloak team 1.0". And everybody remembers how it finished. And Cloak team 2.0 almost 100% repeat copy/paste this pattern with Cloak 2.0 in 2015, the same months... For what everybody can see, Cloak is almost at same level of developpement and public trust than 12 month ago.
Anonymous altcoins lovers don't need a Twitterbot gadget not anonymous, or an Android wallet not anonymous, or advertising videos made by LucasArt, or a sparkling blockexplorer, or announce of "some big changes for the project" (you know what I think about, if it's what I beleive), or regular text updates full of Peace & Love, with background of violin music, raining flowers, bright and pure perfect future, but only asking to wait again and telling us all is going to arrive and be fine.
No : rare last alive Cloak supporters only want the only important thing they were expecting of Cloak : a Cloak wallet finally really anonymous (at least, for what you told us) to use a (supposed) good anonymous and private coin. But it never comes.
Yes, it's pretty...
But once again, you loose time with details.
https://bchain.info/CLOAK/ was good enough for now.
The only ultra priority thing the last Cloak believers are asking for, is the final PoSA3 anonymous working wallet, supposed to be "almost 99% finished" since beginning August, if I remember good.
No surprise prices crashes...
Sorry to write that, don't want to hurt, but it's only a fact that everybody can clearly see : the pattern of promised product release and communications is almost identical as what happened in Summer & Autumn 2014, with "Cloak 1.0" and "Cloak team 1.0". And everybody remembers how it finished. And Cloak team 2.0 almost 100% repeat copy/paste this pattern with Cloak 2.0 in 2015, the same months... For what everybody can see, Cloak is almost at same level of developpement and public trust than 12 month ago.
Anonymous altcoins lovers don't need a Twitterbot gadget not anonymous, or an Android wallet not anonymous, or advertising videos made by LucasArt, or a sparkling blockexplorer, or announce of "some big changes for the project" (you know what I think about, if it's what I beleive), or regular text updates full of Peace & Love, with background of violin music, raining flowers, bright and pure perfect future, but only asking to wait again and telling us all is going to arrive and be fine.
No : rare last alive Cloak supporters only want the only important thing they were expecting of Cloak : a Cloak wallet finally really anonymous (at least, for what you told us) to use a (supposed) good anonymous and private coin. But it never comes.
Unfortunately it's true
I now have serious doubts about the "CloakCoin" and cloak team
Wallet was already in the beta version, but everything stopped after audit
Maybe it's not all the problems have been published
Who knows who Iain 'Jonny Bravo' Craig, I would like to talk with him
How can I contact him
MH17 report: Russian-made BUK missile hit plane over Ukraine - Dutch experts
MH17 report: Russian-made BUK missile hit plane over Ukraine - Dutch experts
The Dutch Safety Board present extensive evidence after 15-month long investigation
Brought down by a Russian-made BUK missile - that was the result of a Dutch-led inquiry into the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 disaster over eastern Ukraine. Investigators presented their final report on Tuesday afternoon.
This footage is from the conference in the Netherlands. The report went into extensive detail about how the passenger plane was hit. It said that the warhead was detonated on the left side of the cockpit, outside of the aircraft.
In the explosion, thousands of small metal objects hit MH17 with incredible force, causing extensive structural damage to the forward part of the plane.
Experts also concluded that those aboard would have died instantly and that the impact was not from an air-to-air missile strike, a common theory presented by Russian-backed media.
It was also found that prior to the downing of MH17, some 160 flights by 61 operators from 32 different countries flew over the eastern Ukraine conflict zone between 14-17 July 2014 before the airspace was closed.
The reason for this was the fact nobody, neither the Ukrainian government nor international air operators, took into account the risk of choosing that particular flight route.
The Dutch Safety Board called on all countries in conflict to do more to ensure civilian airliners. The conclusions took 15 months to complete and from the start, didn't set out to lay blame on any particular group that is out of the investigators remit and will be dealt with in a separate case.
Source: REUTERS
The Dutch Safety Board present extensive evidence after 15-month long investigation
Brought down by a Russian-made BUK missile - that was the result of a Dutch-led inquiry into the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 disaster over eastern Ukraine. Investigators presented their final report on Tuesday afternoon.
This footage is from the conference in the Netherlands. The report went into extensive detail about how the passenger plane was hit. It said that the warhead was detonated on the left side of the cockpit, outside of the aircraft.
In the explosion, thousands of small metal objects hit MH17 with incredible force, causing extensive structural damage to the forward part of the plane.
Experts also concluded that those aboard would have died instantly and that the impact was not from an air-to-air missile strike, a common theory presented by Russian-backed media.
It was also found that prior to the downing of MH17, some 160 flights by 61 operators from 32 different countries flew over the eastern Ukraine conflict zone between 14-17 July 2014 before the airspace was closed.
The reason for this was the fact nobody, neither the Ukrainian government nor international air operators, took into account the risk of choosing that particular flight route.
The Dutch Safety Board called on all countries in conflict to do more to ensure civilian airliners. The conclusions took 15 months to complete and from the start, didn't set out to lay blame on any particular group that is out of the investigators remit and will be dealt with in a separate case.
Source: REUTERS