The team is working on that around the clock. It is a hard and long road to get that done. First half of 2017 was a free for all for all ICO's and tokens, but with the more and more pressing rules by covernments and organizations like the ECB and SEC, exachanges are very reluctant and carefull listing new tokens.
They take a risk with every coin they list, and might be held accountable or liable for it.
Due diligence is top of mind, and therefore it takes a while. You here nothing about it because there is no news to report, but that does not mean that behind the seemingly closed doors, a lot of work is put into it.

I expect it not to be a pump, but anticipation for the new designed wallet

Tidal waves ahead... prepair for a Pillar Tsunami

PLR 2 the Moon

I totally agree, I love to get PLR at the current rate, its a bargain!

The desings are posted here: https://pillarproject.io/design-contest-entries/

Some ar really REALLY nice, slick and strong. Kick ass!

that's cool!

The market price determining the token value is an interesting one. But I think, market price is determined in $ for PL.
Right now, with cryptos taking another / continuing dive, they are not that great to invest, because once converted into $, your week-bonus is actually compensating low price index.
Is the crypto market currently working against the concept of market price determination? Would high price of cryptos vs fiat have generated more funding for PL? Any thoughts?

Hey... wait a minute.. WTF, why am I the troll here?
I only asked one "critical" question, namely why they use a personal wallet address for each transaction instead of having one main address (and that this may reduce transparency on the total amount of funds raised).
In my other posts I am (to wrap it all into one) stating that it is easy for anybody to shout 'SCAM' without any real evidence or proof. No one can give guarantees on the outcome of PL, so anyone should draw there own conclusions on whether to participate or not
Also I was stating the compared to other ICO's PowerLedger is one of the few to ave a real company and working product or prototype, which should reduce the risk.
So I am not the troll here, I hoped to be the one to but all those 'SCAM' yellers a bit more in context.

Reading back, maybe my comment on the answers to the huge questions list could be interpreted as sarcastic, but I was sincere in stating that I would not have expected PL to get into each and everyone of them.

 

You hear a lot of things "in the news".
No one can guarantee you anything, but it is a real, registered and renowned company behind it, so the risk losing a legit company if they would pull a stunt.
So you should draw your own conclusions, but at least it is one of the most measurable and tangible project in ICO-land there is.
ICOs are always a risk, but in my mind this is the one having the least risk tied to it

I have no idea why I should. Second of all, the confirmation mail is plain text email which can be easily faked by using a anonimous wallet, and third of all, tokens are distributed after ICO, so there are no tokens to show (yet). Thus, no reason or value for showing the email

Wow, PowerLedger is REALLY answering all the questions.... what an effort.
The next one yelling 'SCAM': I will gladly donate my tokens to send a few thousands Solar powered Volts through their brain

Does anybody know why these personal contracts are used? So why any participant gets its own address?
Also, because the anti-whale cap could be sidestepped this way very easy

It is not that chique to hijack the PowerLedger topic to promote a possible compatitor.
Apart from that, I just read greeneum website for 5 minutes, and I can already raise a lot of questions about the "vision" even if they have not listed their ICO.
So, I think the word "scam" is always more quickly typed than proven, and this can be done for any project, company  or ICO.
If you want to search and point to "shady" things, you can do that for any project

Granted, the use of personal addresses makes everyting less transparent.
On the other hand, all token transactions from the SM can be backtracked, and a simple ethereum scan can show any discrepancies

Dude, if you even try to read the 5 steps of the process? Reading step 1 - 5 should be pretty easy, and quite essential before you start participating right?


So, if I received a unique payment address, I would be more amazed if it contained any transactions, instead of being amazed it is empty.
It is sort of the whole point of being unique and generated for you, that it is empty

I am also curious if the .com was of ED or of the scammers... no definitive answer yet...

The easiest way to find the smart contract, is to send a very small amount of eth to their ICO, and follow the money

Again someboday saying 20%... the TOKEN GENERATION PAPER on their website still says 15%
Is the document wrong?

https://medium.com/power-ledger/hello-world-meet-power-ledger-b67a2a62301e

There is some reference material

I dont know if they did more than that, but at least they have working prototypes and trials