First bid received at a price should take priority unless otherwise stated in OP.

OP, your change to standard practice when it suited you, and not the bidders, is unacceptable imo.  I personally would never bid on one of your auctions after seeing this and would advise others to do the same.

I’d be willing to give up a set to help with this guys

It's not about one user giving a set up or not it's about the auction not being clear with its rules..

Right now another guy is getting fucked as well that bid on 2 sets but you have decided to prioritize the people that bid on more sets.

You say that higher bid has priority, sure thing but don't make it an auction where people bid on individual items then as you basically held 60 auctions in one here..

I'm going to have to agree that this ended a bit weird.. Since WritingG123 placed a bid of 1 set at 0.001 BTC and then wolfcoin made a bid of 15 sets at 0.001 BTC per set but his bid came in after WritingG123 placed his bid, so shouldn't wolfcoin get 14 sets and WritingG get his 1 set?

As previously stated it is your show but to me this seems odd..

So you're saying I could have bid 20 @ .001 still won for the same price and gotten double the chips? That is a flawed auction process man. The people who bid first should have priority over a higher quantity bid at the same price that was made later.

I should be on top of the list, then the 10 hour left list you posted with minerjones at top should fill out the rest below me, then you add the other who bid later after that regardless of quantity, because everyone under me bid the same price!

I'm not telling you how to run your auction, and I bid what I bid and will pay what I bid, but there is no logic in this system, what I outlined above is the logical and correct way to do it, with all due respect.

All  @ .003

Nice cases, can you label the cases above/below them so we can know which style is which?  Thanks ahead of time.   

So these are 5 coins for $10?