The idea is promising. The list of your partners is impressing!
You have a very long roadmap to go.
Good luck with your project, devs!
I'll consider joining too but a bit later.

You said that you have a high-experienced team consisted of financial experts etc. Is it possible to see your team mebers and find out who are they exactly? Thanks!

I wrote your project and you have â great idea. I think you will complete the deficiencies in the system. if you follow the road map and your work continues. the future is yours.

I have no doubt the team want your companies to do well- obviously you do, it directly links to your remuneration. Unfortunately wanting to succeed isn't actually enough evidence to warrant investment - or else the financial universe would, I'm sure, be a lot simpler.

From what I gather this is essentially raising money for the companies backing the ICO to fund expansion? I can see the benefit of launching an ICO instead of listing/seeking PE or seed funding, I'm sure it's a lot cheaper. What I can't understand is why you would expect anyone to invest without having an extremely thorough explanation of company accounts, meetings with management and so on. Why would a private investor not expect the same level of detail as an institution funding directly?

Everything here is so weak - I have seen no facts or figures backing up any claims other than "we're going to do this" and "we sell supercars". This means absolutely nothing. What are their margins? How strong is their balance sheet? What are the management's plans for the company and how do they plan to achieve these? Further, "a verified track record" of trading shows absolutely nothing about the company! Where are your funds under management? What are your risk parameters? If you were consistently achieving the returns that you claim you would have major financial institutions lining up at your door offering billions for you to manage, or alternatively buying your technology making you millionaires on the spot. Unfortunately since they have not, this makes me doubt your potential.

Claiming one of your backers is "unwilling to release information... because of competitors" is ridiculous. What you have essentially told me is - "invest in me because... trust me". And at the same time I see the founder splashing a load of cash on helicopters for his father and supercars. How is that a convincing argument for me to know my cash invested will be used wisely?

All I have deduced from the information provided is that you want cash from investors but aren't willing to give tangible investment information. It's all a show.

submitted thanks for the awesome bounty programme

Reserve Russian Translation ANN + Bounty Thread + landing page + Whitepaper

Username: Smart man
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1090672
Native Language: Russian
ETH 0x1F9703d713ea1a69C749D93d79eca81E3E5E7Bf8
Portfolio/Experience/previous translations links:  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H29oVnTIw-hSuAJKgwP-bx7BhdE7yjN6wAlgY97m-2I/edit

If you are interested in my assistance, please send me a personal message   

I am going to flag up 3 things -

1) The softcap was hit almost immediately and then rapidly slowed. It seems suspicious that a money-back guarantee was only set up to this limit, meaning any new investors will have no recourse if things go wrong. I wonder where that initial investment came from?

2) The only responses by YieldCoin are to comments by active members. Further, aside from these two active members all other comments are by brand new users. Is YieldCoin perhaps having their employees/associates with vested interests commenting with positive messages?

3) No single point of failure is great, only if every other point is strong enough to withstand the failure. Is there evidence that each business model is strong and profitable? I am yet to see any balance sheets or any financial information confirming these companies. Until then the multiple points of failure argument is surely moot?

I appreciate these come across as detailed however as an investor one must always be looking at the deeper picture...

Is someone allowed more than one wallet linked to one account?

Thanks for the great insight, am happy to see this project here in forum, was luck to have come across thread, i see others are excited about this project too in your Reddit page, i see soft cap has already been reached within a short period of time, but why run the ico for such a long period of time though? When will yield be looking into exchange listing? Is there plans and discussions in the pipeline about listing? Thanks.

Okey so i have been brainstorming through the website of yield trying to make a comprehensive meaning about the concept of this project and its blockchain relevance, though its seems to be the first project claims to be multipurpose,

Now speaking of which, may i ask how is yield multipurpose token? In what ways? Aside from been a token, what other purpose yield token can serve?

In your website there are alot of Experience from different company or organization listed, are those a combination of individual experience gained by the yield dev team? How long has the team been together?

Okay, given the fact that you hit your soft cap at the shortest time possible but guaranteeing that this will have no single point of failure is too much. Please don't promise too much because if this project will encounter obstacles someday, it will lose its credibility.

Shorting has a place and you've offered a good basic description. In crypto however it's such a risky strategy. So many people have racked up huge negative positions by letting a short run. In a market that is overall so bullish in the long run it's best to steer clear of shorting unless you're very risk-loving and have a great understanding of shorting and how crypto markets tend to operate.