Search content
Sort by
Showing 7 of 7 results by Zoli
I hope some release soon will pump the price. Ok the project isn't out still but the SONM token is doing really bad on market.
1,6xICO price after almost 10months is bad when market is doinc x4 by the same time. by the same time RLC token is x5
1,6xICO price after almost 10months is bad when market is doinc x4 by the same time. by the same time RLC token is x5
I hate snm/btc on binance, because they are only bots to make orders (look at the token quantities) programmed with the feet, and this F***ing bots they have a tendency to dumping; and i really hope that they are not the same binance account, those that move this kind of orders, because i like exchange
Before start SONM wallet 0.1.6, when launching
npm i
i receive this warns
here:
npm list
Additional Info:
installed packages
nodejs 9.3.0-1
g++ 5.4.1-11
How can i solve ?
npm i
i receive this warns
Code:
npm WARN react-addons-transition-group@15.6.2 requires a peer of react@^15.4.2 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
npm WARN react-slick@0.15.4 requires a peer of react@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
npm WARN react-slick@0.15.4 requires a peer of react-dom@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
npm WARN slick-carousel@1.8.1 requires a peer of jquery@>=1.8.0 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
npm WARN optional SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: fsevents@1.1.3 (node_modules/fsevents):
npm WARN notsup SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: Unsupported platform for fsevents@1.1.3: wanted {"os":"darwin","arch":"any"} (current: {"os":"linux","arch":"x64"})
npm WARN react-slick@0.15.4 requires a peer of react@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
npm WARN react-slick@0.15.4 requires a peer of react-dom@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
npm WARN slick-carousel@1.8.1 requires a peer of jquery@>=1.8.0 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
npm WARN optional SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: fsevents@1.1.3 (node_modules/fsevents):
npm WARN notsup SKIPPING OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY: Unsupported platform for fsevents@1.1.3: wanted {"os":"darwin","arch":"any"} (current: {"os":"linux","arch":"x64"})
here:
npm list
Code:
UNMET PEER DEPENDENCY react@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1
│ ├── UNMET PEER DEPENDENCY react-dom@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1
UNMET PEER DEPENDENCY jquery@>=1.8.0
UNMET PEER DEPENDENCY react@16.2.0
UNMET OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY fsevents@^1.0.0
│ ├── UNMET PEER DEPENDENCY react-dom@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1
UNMET PEER DEPENDENCY jquery@>=1.8.0
UNMET PEER DEPENDENCY react@16.2.0
UNMET OPTIONAL DEPENDENCY fsevents@^1.0.0
Code:
npm ERR! peer dep missing: react@^15.4.2, required by react-addons-transition-group@15.6.2
npm ERR! peer dep missing: react@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1, required by react-slick@0.15.4
npm ERR! peer dep missing: react-dom@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1, required by react-slick@0.15.4
npm ERR! peer dep missing: jquery@>=1.8.0, required by slick-carousel@1.8.1
npm ERR! peer dep missing: react@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1, required by react-slick@0.15.4
npm ERR! peer dep missing: react-dom@^0.14.0 || ^15.0.1, required by react-slick@0.15.4
npm ERR! peer dep missing: jquery@>=1.8.0, required by slick-carousel@1.8.1
Additional Info:
installed packages
nodejs 9.3.0-1
g++ 5.4.1-11
How can i solve ?
I've been wondering for a while, isn't binance a chinese exchange? If yes why they are safe from chinese government while the other chinese exchange got notice. I just hope sonm get listed in exchange other than liqui without problem.
That is what I was wondering actually. I have read all exchanges in China will be shut down. If this is the case we would wait the team to find another exchange if they have a intention to do so. They haven't been caring too much about being on exchanges other than what we have now. They are concentrating on product development instead.Kind regards,
Only yuan to BTC trade will be forbidden, alle other trades are allowed. Stupid chinese governement fears their yen will drop massivly because regular people put more trust in bitcoin (understandably). So Binance can add it and we can trade on the exchange, just like any other exchange at the moment.
Binance International will Continue to Work
https://binance.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001567991-Binance-International-will-Continue-to-Work
Quote
Dear all,
Given recent news from China, we want to let all of our users know that Binance will continue to function uninterrupted. Binance has stopped servicing users in China since Sept 6, 2017, but will continue to service international users unchanged.
Thank you for your support!
Binance Team
2017/09/14
Given recent news from China, we want to let all of our users know that Binance will continue to function uninterrupted. Binance has stopped servicing users in China since Sept 6, 2017, but will continue to service international users unchanged.
Thank you for your support!
Binance Team
2017/09/14
Re: [ANN][GNT] Golem Project - The world’s most powerful supercomputer
Anybody know about this ?
https://blog.golemproject.net/how-to-find-10m-by-just-reading-blockchain-6ae9d39fcd95
whether the problem is resolved , if not yet , this news can be make panic sell GNT next time.
https://blog.golemproject.net/how-to-find-10m-by-just-reading-blockchain-6ae9d39fcd95
whether the problem is resolved , if not yet , this news can be make panic sell GNT next time.
It's old issue (6 April), and i think is reported only to Poloniex, infact in this tweet https://mobile.twitter.com/golemproject/status/892321003405283328 on the recent maintenance (last days of July and early August) of gnt wallet in the above exchange, golemproject says
Quote
We're not contacting them, especially after their violent reaction when we pointed out a flaw in their system earlier this year.
Anyway the gnt wallet maintenance on Poloniex has lasted at least one week, and it is presumed that the reason was the one you mentioned
Re: [ANN][GNT] Golem Project - The world’s most powerful supercomputer
Here a video where the golemnetwork team, explains the potential of the project.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IMHwZKFPJo
(i don't know if it's old or not)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IMHwZKFPJo
(i don't know if it's old or not)
Re: [ANN][CLOAK] Private, Secure, Untraceable & Decentralized Digitalcurrency
"Stake" only show something when coins are in stake mode. Fell free to join our chat at https://chat.cloakcoin.com there is always someone around to help with questions!
thanks Yogibaer
Re: [ANN][CLOAK] Private, Secure, Untraceable & Decentralized Digitalcurrency
Hello everyone,
this is my first post on Bitcointalk
but for a while i'm following some discussion.
A few days ago i have installed on raspberry pi 3, raspbian jessy lite (32 bit), and after reading the guide on cloackoin site to staking (minting).
In one case cloakcoin.d crashed after 3-4 days.
Now, my node is up from some days, but i'm not sure that everything works correctly, because my stake it's ever 0.00000000
This is my ./cloakcoind getinfo
and this is a portion of the debug.log
Do they need more information ?
Or is it all right ?
this is my first post on Bitcointalk
but for a while i'm following some discussion.A few days ago i have installed on raspberry pi 3, raspbian jessy lite (32 bit), and after reading the guide on cloackoin site to staking (minting).
In one case cloakcoin.d crashed after 3-4 days.
Now, my node is up from some days, but i'm not sure that everything works correctly, because my stake it's ever 0.00000000
This is my ./cloakcoind getinfo
Code:
"version" : "v2.0.2.0 'DEFENDER'",
"protocolversion" : 60018,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : x,xxxxxxxx
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 1658380,
"moneysupply" : 4978377.30382200,
"connections" : 12,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx",
"difficulty" : 1266.21888369,
"testnet" : 0,
"keypoololdest" : 1501405967,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.01000000,
"unlocked_until" : 1511674542,
"errors" : "",
"anons" : 214,
"cloakings" : 0
"protocolversion" : 60018,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : x,xxxxxxxx
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 1658380,
"moneysupply" : 4978377.30382200,
"connections" : 12,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx",
"difficulty" : 1266.21888369,
"testnet" : 0,
"keypoololdest" : 1501405967,
"keypoolsize" : 102,
"paytxfee" : 0.01000000,
"unlocked_until" : 1511674542,
"errors" : "",
"anons" : 214,
"cloakings" : 0
and this is a portion of the debug.log
Code:
Staking is ENABLED.
ENIGMA is ENABLED on this node.
====================
ThreadPosaBroadcaster started
ThreadSocketHandler started
ThreadMapPort started
Done loading
ThreadOpenAddedConnections started
ThreadDNSAddressSeed started
Loading addresses from DNS seeds (could take a while)
0 addresses found from DNS seeds
ThreadDNSAddressSeed exited
ThreadMessageHandler started
ThreadOpenConnections started
ThreadStakeMinter started
CPUMiner started for proof-of-stake
ThreadRPCServer started
ThreadEnigma started
Flushed 14008 addresses to peers.dat 195ms
trying connection 209.160.114.249:29662 lastseen=1008.7hrs
GetMyExternalIP() received [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:0
GetMyExternalIP() returned xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
AddLocal(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:29662,5)
ThreadRPCServer method=getinfo
No valid UPnP IGDs found
ENIGMA is ENABLED on this node.
====================
ThreadPosaBroadcaster started
ThreadSocketHandler started
ThreadMapPort started
Done loading
ThreadOpenAddedConnections started
ThreadDNSAddressSeed started
Loading addresses from DNS seeds (could take a while)
0 addresses found from DNS seeds
ThreadDNSAddressSeed exited
ThreadMessageHandler started
ThreadOpenConnections started
ThreadStakeMinter started
CPUMiner started for proof-of-stake
ThreadRPCServer started
ThreadEnigma started
Flushed 14008 addresses to peers.dat 195ms
trying connection 209.160.114.249:29662 lastseen=1008.7hrs
GetMyExternalIP() received [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:0
GetMyExternalIP() returned xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
AddLocal(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:29662,5)
ThreadRPCServer method=getinfo
No valid UPnP IGDs found
Do they need more information ?
Or is it all right ?