If you dig ETH, the RX560 is half of the RX570, and the RX550 is half of the RX560.

Parameter setting join

# GPU crash handling
# Enter OS terminal command here
# for example:
#   onCrash = "shutdown -r 1"
onCrash = "taskkill /f /im xpmclient.exe";

As long as the GPU crashes, it will force xpmclient.exe to be closed.
But restarting xpmclient.exe requires another batch file.

-------------------------------------------
:1
TIMEOUT 10
tasklist | find /i "xpmclient.exe"  || echo %date% %time% XPM START >> log.txt && start xpmclient
goto 1
-------------------------------------------

Copy the text inside the dotted line to a new text file, and modify the extension file name to .bat and put the same path into xpmclient.exe

In the future, as long as the new batch file is executed, the GPU crash can be forced to close the software, and then xpmclient.exe is automatically restarted.

The version window of xpmclient-opencl-10.5-beta1-win64 has the time to display the current continuous operation, at least 172800 sec, that is, no abnormality in gpu for 2 days.

The software version is currently xpmclient-opencl-10.5-beta1-win64.
Will automatically switch difficulty.
powertune ?

My setup parameters

kernelType = "asm";
cpuload = "1";
sieveSize = "480";
weaveDepth = "36864";
width = "auto";
windowSize = "8192";
multiplierLimits = ["24", "31", "35"];
powertune =      ["38", "38", "38", "38", "38", "38", "38", "38"];

Powertune is set to 38, because the power of the GPU BIOS has been set to lower, but will reduce the daily profit, so it is increased to 38

There is currently no such situation and the difficulty is reduced again. CPD's computing power has increased by 27 times, From 11.05 CPD up to 318 CPD,and daily rewards have increased from 96 XPM to 108 to 113.
I recommend that you check if the parameters or overclocking parameters are stable.
If the mining is unstable, it is often less than an hour to display the card error, and the profit is naturally declining.

I have several RX580 brands, but I have changed the BIOS to dig ETH, so if I dig XPM, there is a close core frequency, and there are some differences in micro-computing power. I think this is caused by the modification of the label and BIOS. For 0.49 CPD, the lowest is 0.43 CPD, which is under the asm mode.

Using version 10.5 for a few days, I found one thing, counting 11 CPD per day, theoretically 87 XPM a day.
https://upload.cc/i1/2019/08/01/wQrWnx.jpg

But I found that 96XPM was dug for a day, equivalent to 12 CPD computing power. I think the developer's so-called Radeon 4xx / 5xx GPU on Linux is up to 30%, and it can also be on WINDOWS, but it can't be displayed on the computing power.

https://upload.cc/i1/2019/08/01/c4uWpk.jpg
https://upload.cc/i1/2019/08/01/Ob3kUx.jpg

The new version of 10.5 asm mode has increased a lot of cpd, the original 8 amd gpu only 2.96cpd, rose to 3.43 in asm mode, but the stability is tested as needed.

But the temperature of ASM mode has risen to 70 degrees ~ very high temperature

25 GPU power increased by 144W

The original version 10.2.2 is 9.3 CPD
Rise to 11.08CPD

Core 1300
Memory 1750
Xpmclient only looks at the core frequency, the higher the better, but also the power and temperature

If only RX4 series and 5 series are used
You can get a higher CPD on xpmclient 10.2.2 The impression of using xpmclient 10.3 is that the CPD is lower, and the higher overclocking parameters are not acceptable.


If you insist on a higher overclocking parameter, xpmclient 10.3 will continue to display the reset display card parameters, and the display card stops responding.

In addition, digging xpmclient is not related to the memory capacity of the display card. The RX480 will have a higher CPD than the RX470. In addition, the label is required. The ASUS RX470 is always lower than other CPDs such as PowerColor or MSI.


Look at the core/memory frequency, overclocking parameters of 1250/1750
RX470's CPD is about 0.34~0.42
Look at the compatible version of the BIOS is good

In the xpmclient 10.2.2 version, 25 RX4 series and RX5 series can get 9.425 CPD. If it is in xpmclient 10.3 version, then 9.0 CPD is left, and the amount dug in one day is directly worse than 3 XPM.

It is now 2880 times to confirm the transaction to the transaction. Does anyone know why?
It takes almost three days, very long

Later I will power +25~30%
The daily income is the same as the calculator result.

But the 10.3 version of the GPU often digs half of the crash, the probability is quite high.
Even the mining window closed for no reason.

In version 10.2.2, such overclocking parameters are very stable, but become unstable at 10.3, and even the core 1150 / memory 2000 collapses.

Ultimately supported by version 10.3

# GPU crash handling
# Enter OS terminal command here
# for example:
#   onCrash = "shutdown -r 1"
onCrash = "taskkill /f /im xpmclient.exe";

Automatically forced to close the mining software when the GPU crashes.

Then with the batch file
:1
TIMEOUT 10
tasklist | find /i "xpmclient.exe"  || echo %date% %time% XPM START >> log.txt && start xpmclient
goto 1

Monitor mining software for execution and monitor every 10 seconds.

If you do not execute, you can automatically restart the mining software.

The last current parameter is

platform = "amd";
cpuload = "1";
target = "auto";
sieveSize = "420";
weaveDepth = "40960";
width = "auto";
windowSize = "8192";
multiplierLimits = ["25", "31", "34"];

The parameters of multiplierLimits = ["25", "31", "34"];
The test result is more than the calculator.

But now it is not a difficult problem, it is the difference between the actual number of mining and the result calculated by the calculator.

Hello, may I have someone encountered this problem?

GPU has RX570, a total of 9
My computing power has 3.13 CPD

In theory, the final test difficulty is 11.30, and there will be 16 XPM in one day.

But when I actually tested for an hour, it only increased by 0.42 XPM, which is equivalent to about 10 XPM per day, which is very different from the result of the calculator.

It is the same whether  use version 10.2.2 or 10.3.
Whether the driver version is the latest 19.3.1 or the mining driver is the same
My parameters are set as follows

platform = "amd";
cpuload = "1";
target = "auto";
sieveSize = "420";
weaveDepth = "40960";
width = "auto";
windowSize = "8192";
multiplierLimits = ["24", "31", "35"];


Overclocking parameters are the same as Core 1300 / Memory 1750, or Core 1150 / Memory 2000

The average daily is lower than the computer 10~14 XPM
But it started to decrease after February 24~ there are 24 XPM in one day.

I have been digging for half a year, but never less than the calculator is so big