https://check-host.net/check-dns?host=europe.cryptonight-hub.miningpoolhub.com

find an ip which is the fastest. copy and save it somewhere.

and change your host --> C:\Windows\System32\Drivers\etc
edit your host file and add      europe.cryptonight-hub.miningpoolhub.com
save your file and try to run.
* do not put "#" in front of your IP in your host file *

Because your DNS provider sucks and doesn't resolve the hostname to a proper IP address.
Use CloudFlare's 1.1.1.1 1.0.0.1 public DNS servers and you should be fine.

https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-7-1700x

close to my Rysen 1600, and yeah max perf is --auto -t 4 --archi ryzen
Heavy is the algo where, honnestly, i beat xmrig by the lowest factor, i'm less than 1% better. on 64 bits aes. on 32 bits and non aes i obliterate it.

edit: all code done for dualshare, now entering test phase.
perfs on one thread, with compared to without doublehash

core2 64 bits : +5%
core2 32 bits +11%
ryzen 64 bits : +92%
ryzen 32 bits +99%

The ryzen pipelining is impressive...

impressive score with a Vishera, close to my Ryzen ! ...

8 apps on 4 mobile phones

Nice. Do you mind sharing the link of that tutorial

Besides, I have tried a bunch of RX 560 2gb BIOS and none of them can unlock more shaders beyond the existing 768 ones

Yes, indeed, he is right:

3T => 58 H/s
3T + helper => 64 H/s
4T => 70 H/s

And that despite Deneb has only 6 MB L3 cache.  But I forgot the special cache architecture of AMD systems. Intel systems have inclusive caches. So the size of the L3 cache is the maximum cacheable size, because the data in L2 and L1 are just subsets of a copy. AMD systems instead have exclusive caches, where no data is ever stored in L2 and L3 at the same time. That's why you can add L2 and L3 cache size. Deneb has 4x 512 KB L2. Together with the 6 MB L3 you get 8 MB cache altogether; or room for 4 threads. 

But it still can be helpful for non-AES Intel CPUs with limited L3 (Lynnfield) or for Phenom II X6 to use the last two cores, as well

Dual mine forbidden with AES and Cryptonight Heavy.
AES because it's always far worse than regular threads, Heavy because there's no longer smooth parts in cryptonight version Heavy, so threads have no longer any resource to share.

Dual is for non-aes, C-Night[v7], C-Light[v7], 32 or 64 bits.

Four threads ? So it's better to use 4 normal threads than 3 + dualmine ? [heart broken]
If that's what you say, so it's another proof the dual mine is useless outside the very rare case of a 2M-cache dual core cpu.

Dual mining is perfect for AMD Phenom II X4. It has an L3 cache of 6 MB, so 3 cryptonight threads fit into it. But is has 4 cores, so with a normal miner, one core is without a job. Thanks to dual mining I can fill the L3 with 3 threads and add a "helper thread" to the 4th core. It looks like this:

"cpu_threads_conf" :
[
     { "cpu_architecture" : "deneb", "affine_to_cpu" : 0, "use_cache" : true },
     { "cpu_architecture" : "deneb", "affine_to_cpu" : 1, "use_cache" : true },
     { "cpu_architecture" : "deneb", "affine_to_cpu" : 2, "use_cache" : true },
     { "cpu_architecture" : "deneb", "affine_to_cpu" : 3, "use_cache" : true, "dual_mine_with": 2 },
]

Without dual mining the Phenom II X4 905e hashes up to 58 H/s. Thanks to dual mining on the last core, it's 64 H/s

I got a 11268-15 4GB
http://www.bilder-upload.eu/show.php?file=ebd96b-1518633245.png

It is possible to unlock a 560D, not a 560.
http://www.bilder-upload.eu/show.php?file=5ce9c8-1518633287.png

About 10-11 Mh/s eth.

Well my colleagues have tested that and I checked their phones, they maybe claiming that they don't use much CPU resources but their phones were really hot when the app was running. Mobile phone I am talking are all the same, Samsung Galaxy A5 given by our company. I still say that people should not risk their devices for a ridiculous amount of dollars they will be receiving monthly, it simply is not worth it, they are shortening the life of their mobile when using this and any other miner.