Ninjastic
Search content
Sort by
Showing 7 of 7 results by adaris
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports
by
adaris
on 28/02/2024, 14:58:00 UTC
Is it possible to adapt an ASIC miner to this program as a coprocessor because it has higher speed?
Or perhaps use MicroRNG is a hardware (true) random number generator?
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports
by
adaris
on 15/01/2022, 16:08:12 UTC
Hello. please help me to calculate the probability of winning puzzle 120 in random mode
if
i have 20000000001 keysubtract
speed 27000000/s

what are the chances ?
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports
by
adaris
on 24/10/2021, 19:15:54 UTC
is it possible to add a mode -B danсe to xpoint mode?
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports
by
adaris
on 13/10/2021, 12:37:34 UTC
⭐ Merited by NotATether (1)
small calculation of how much RAM is needed to solve 120 puzzles
-n 0x100000000000000000000000000000 -k 1
Bloom filter for 288230376151711744 elements = 20152 TB ram  Shocked
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports
by
adaris
on 13/10/2021, 09:56:34 UTC
I have a question about the operating mode -M matrix screen
It increases the chances of winning in random mode?

this seems to be a bug because I can't see the speed counter in -M mode
constantly jumps to the next line
Quote
./keyhunt -m rmd160 -f tests/64.rmd -l compress -s 10 -b 64 -R -t 24 -M

Quote
Base key: b446a02fd6f5381f
Base key: cae8a89843ee4ee8
Base key: 82fc18d395467fd4

I do not understand why the creation Bloom filter, became very slow almost 10  slower.
I used the -S key and -M.
as I understand the key -S Bloom filter is created on disk/ from here creation Bloom filter the speed drops

The previous version of the program directly created bloom in RAM
And now it’s impossible?

 

Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: VanitySearch (Yet another address prefix finder)
by
adaris
on 17/02/2021, 16:02:32 UTC
And since I understood if I add a key -r 10 the algorithm begins to generate keys in a random 10Mkey/s and check with a list of existing addresses.
it turns into a game who is more successful in this version of the universe  Smiley
Quote
VanitySearch.exe -t 0 -gpu -gpuId 0 -g 24,128 -r 10 -i btc.txt -o output.txt
I think this is better than generating one key and searching nearby in a small range of matches.


my benchmark on GPU GeForce GT 1030

Quote
C:\Users\adaris\Desktop\btc\VanitySearch>VanitySearch.exe -check
GetBase10() Results OK
Add() Results OK : 427.350 MegaAdd/sec
Mult() Results OK : 31.716 MegaMult/sec
Div() Results OK : 4.322 MegaDiv/sec
R1=1000003D1
R2=1000007A2000E90A1
Field characteristic size: 256bits
ModInv()/ModExp() Results OK
ModInv() Edge cases Results OK
.Avg = 6.13
ModInv() Results OK : 445.968 KiloInv/sec
ModInv() cycles : 6503.24
ModSqrt() Results OK !
IntGroup.ModInv() Results OK : 5.641 MegaInv/sec
ModMulK1() Results OK : 27.392 MegaMult/sec
ModSquareK1() Results OK : 31.616 MegaSqr/sec
ModInv() Cost : 141.8 S
ModMulK1order() Results OK : 3.785 MegaMult/sec
Check Generator :OK
Check Double :OK
Check Add :OK
Check GenKey :OK
Adress : 15t3Nt1zyMETkHbjJTTshxLnqPzQvAtdCe OK!
Adress : 1BoatSLRHtKNngkdXEeobR76b53LETtpyT OK!
Adress : 1Test6BNjSJC5qwYXsjwKVLvz7DpfLehy OK!
Adress : 16S5PAsGZ8VFM1CRGGLqm37XHrp46f6CTn OK!
Adress : 1Tst2RwMxZn9cYY5mQhCdJic3JJrK7Fq7 OK!
Adress : 3CyQYcByvcWK8BkYJabBS82yDLNWt6rWSx OK!
Adress : 31to1KQe67YjoDfYnwFJThsGeQcFhVDM5Q OK!
Adress : bc1q6tqytpg06uhmtnhn9s4f35gkt8yya5a24dptmn OK!
Check Calc PubKey (full) 1ViViGLEawN27xRzGrEhhYPQrZiTKvKLo :OK
Check Calc PubKey (even) 385cR5DM96n1HvBDMzLHPYcw89fZAXULJP:OK
Check Calc PubKey (odd) 18aPiLmTow7Xgu96msrDYvSSWweCvB9oBA:OK
GPU: GPU #0 GeForce GT 1030 (3x128 cores) Grid(24x128)
Seed: 1613577059
61.751 MegaKey/sec
ComputeKeys() found 611 items , CPU check...
GPU/CPU check OK
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: VanitySearch (Yet another address prefix finder)
by
adaris
on 17/02/2021, 12:54:13 UTC
I cannot understand what exactly this command gives me. how exactly the search algorithm goes?

Quote
VanitySearch.exe -t 0 -gpu -gpuId 0 -g 24,128 -i all_btc_balance.txt -o output.txt

He starts with a hex key? and ascending searches?
Quote
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
or randomly generates a hex key? and ascending searches?
Quote
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001