Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 83 results by airbin
i know this is good to miners reward
but not to users
i want to know what cause this skyrocket in fee after halving 840000
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/6329d474890da8c2b93d2244bbe51bf6a4e504cc3c34539bb56e91011a578585
but not to users
i want to know what cause this skyrocket in fee after halving 840000
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/6329d474890da8c2b93d2244bbe51bf6a4e504cc3c34539bb56e91011a578585
Like the price, sometimes you have to anticipate this type of situation, Fee, it was known that there would be an increase, it was 100% feasible, what we had no idea was how much the sat/vB fee increase.
I think the idea is to always stay alert that any exchange can have problems, so it's just to be careful that this is possible, so that you don't have that mistaken idea of the user mentioned below.
A lot easier to sell when my crypto is already on the exchange but of course that comes with risk.
Inflation is a poorly focused problem, low salaries, or an income not in line with your consumption, does not mean inflation, it is a phenomenon that, like the climate, affects everyone, there are no social characteristics or economic that are immune to inflation.
Therefore, the first thing to understand is the percentage of inflation that affects your country, there are "normal" percentages, others fluctuate, and the worst of all is the one where you live with an inflationary economy. In any of them, as a citizen you cannot do anything to change these situations, governments and private companies must do them, that is a priority, since that is where you can begin to take basic ideas to face price changes.
Therefore, the first thing to understand is the percentage of inflation that affects your country, there are "normal" percentages, others fluctuate, and the worst of all is the one where you live with an inflationary economy. In any of them, as a citizen you cannot do anything to change these situations, governments and private companies must do them, that is a priority, since that is where you can begin to take basic ideas to face price changes.
Re: More than 10 phishing wallets detected on the Snap Store, be careful
⭐ Merited by vapourminer (1)
Quote
Always have a decoy wallet, in this wallet you must reserve a amount that you are willing to lose (something like US$3 ~ 50) when testing a new wallet just downloaded, you enter this test decoy seedphrase, after all, these fake wallets usually have a malicious code to drain wallets immediately as soon as a wallet with amount is imported, so if your decoy wallet is drained, you will know right away that it is a scam wallet.
Should we use our funds to test for fake or malicious wallet? The points you stated above may be right to some extent but to be frank, you have to make sure you are downloading these wallets apps from the right source, which everyone knows as their official web. Play store, can no longer be trusted so even if you are downloading from Google Play store or other official stores, you should make sure that the website redirects you there. Don't click unknown links to download so as to avoid downloading Trojans or malicious apps.
This way, you don't have to test the authenticity of the wallet with your funds or having to try a decoy just as you stated in your op.
Obviously for someone with experience it sounds unnecessary, but most people don't even understand why an App is in the store, so for the average user, they only know how to go to their app store and download. What is clear is that if you download an App to store money you should follow a security guide. Any Wallet, even a HW, can be compromised. If you use trust as a basis for downloading any software, you are making the first mistake, even if you download a wallet from the same website and follow any of the steps mentioned. Then, testing a wallet with $100 does not offend my knowledge, it strengthens my distrust.
⭐ Merited by darxiaomi (1)
Iba a crear un hilo nuevo con la noticia, se comento en el post anterior.
Una actualizacion, se reporta actividad criminal, la banda ha dico que son un imperio y que no han sido desmnatelados.
Quote
La gran multinacional de los ciberataques LockBit niega haber sido desarticulada: “¡Somos un imperio!”
leer mas aqui https://www.eldiario.es/tecnologia/lockbit-cumple-amenaza-grupo-cibercriminal-danino-mundo-vuelve-actuar-dice-apoyar-trump_1_10956278.htmlotro:
Quote
“En el sector siempre se ha tomado con cautela esto y nos parecía que había sido 'demasiado fácil' desmontar a Lockbit”, continúa este especialista, que destaca que la operación contra ellos ha derivado en “su primer posicionamiento político”: “Dicen abiertamente que quieren que gane Trump”.
leer mas aqui https://www.eldiario.es/tecnologia/lockbit-cumple-amenaza-grupo-cibercriminal-danino-mundo-vuelve-actuar-dice-apoyar-trump_1_10956278.html
Quote
What exactly is bitcoin mining doing to the electric grid? In the last few years, the US has seen a boom in cryptocurrency mining, and the government is now trying to track exactly what that means for the consumption of electricity. While its analysis is preliminary, the Energy Information Agency (EIA) estimates that large-scale cryptocurrency operations are now consuming over 2 percent of the US's electricity. That's roughly the equivalent of having added an additional state to the grid over just the last three years.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/02/over-2-percent-of-the-uss-electricity-generation-now-goes-to-bitcoin/Él consume está llegando al 2% por la minería de bitcoin en los Estados Unidos, es como agregar otro estado mencionan.
¿Tiene su lado positivo a días del Halving?
Re: ¿Podrían los mineros de BTC tener problemas de graves tras el próximo halving?
⭐ Merited by d5000 (1)
Cada quien asume sus teorías, pero básicamente cualquier inquietud para los mineros se resuelve con el incremento del valor de BTC, y la categoría 5, no creo que sea altruista, le conviene, tiene btc. O reservas, como mencionan arriba.
⭐ Merited by vapourminer (1)
I curious to know does this also have a negative effect on quick response codes generated by exchanges. I mean are the QR codes generated by exchanges safe for transactions? And how do they generate there own codes.
The visual verification never fails, so when you copy or use QR simply verify it before sending. I would never use a QR by message or on a website to receive payments.
Quote
QR codes have disadvantages in phishing, since victims need to be compelled to scan them for the attack to progress. But they make it more difficult for victims to evaluate the trustworthiness of the URL they’re clicking on, and it’s more likely that emails containing a QR code will reach their target, because it’s more difficult for spam filters to assess QR images included in an attachment like a PDF...
https://www.wired.com/story/qr-codes-phishing-attack/It is not the subject that concerns here, but...
I've used an Android electrum wallet forever and accidentally updated it (version 4.5.1). Now I have no idea how to send funds. It partially signs and requests a co-signer and I cannot get past this point. I don't see any documentation addressing this so I'm sure it's something I'm overlooking but I'm wasting a ton of time and hoping someone can just point me in the right direction.
It was not an accident the update, it occurs automatically and happened on January 19, 2024, in effect you have the last version 4.5.1, So, check that you have version 6 of android or higher.
If it is not the above, Uninstall it and directly download the new version (play store) and check the APP permits. Verify that it in effect has the correct version and that it corresponds. Take the corresponding forecasts since it may be putting your btc at risk.
Use numerology where appropriate, you've reached the place where you thought you could see results, but it didn't work, I think it's an off-topic, the coincidence of numbers or results, they only serve as they should be: reliables, random result or fake. It may be fun, but it has no serious discussion on Bitcoin.
I think that 2+2=4, right? there are things that just happen, you have to teach that, that is: you have to support your investments, sometimes I think that many discover trivial things and see them as if they were something scientific.
You're absolutely right, but it's not the idea to say I'm not interested, the collective interest is necessary for the support of the entire crypto ecosystem, a response to what happened has to be demanded, That allows support for the crypto environment, entrepreneurs, and end-users.
⭐ Merited by Porfirii (1)
Un dato académico, lo de la palabra cripto, para aquellos que por rigidez académica no permiten nada fuera de la RAE. Gracias para ambos, a propósito de la RAE, que le falta el cierre (?) al título de su blog. Sin querer ser profesor, o arrogante académico.
Aparentemente, la ola de Ordinals está aflojando bastante, como se puede ver en el cuadro de mandos. Desde ayer hay menos de 100 mil transacciones diarias asociadas con Ordinals/BRC-20 - recordemos que hace una, dos semanas eran más de 300 mil. Y como ya observaron las fees en consecuencia están en baja (Y eso que ORDI todavía se mantiene a flote cerca de los $20).
Lo que me llamó la atención en esta última ola es que la actividad era casi permanente durante las 24 horas. Casi no había horarios "valle" en los que las fees bajaban regularmente, sino que las subidas y bajadas de las comisiones parecían más bien impredecibles. Los fines de semana tampoco bajaba mucho la actividad. Podríamos especular que 1) podría haber habido mucha actividad en lugares como Asia y Australia (dónde como sabemos es de día en las horas "valle" de Europa/América), o bien 2) se habrán popularizado servicios automatizados que operaban las 24 horas para generar las transacciones Ordinals en el momento ideal, y probablemente hasta reaccionaban al mercado de las tarifas. Me parecía que siempre cuando las fees bajaban de los 40 sat/vbyte aumentaba el número de transacciones Ordinals, no importando la hora.
Hola, gracias por su explicación.Lo que me llamó la atención en esta última ola es que la actividad era casi permanente durante las 24 horas. Casi no había horarios "valle" en los que las fees bajaban regularmente, sino que las subidas y bajadas de las comisiones parecían más bien impredecibles. Los fines de semana tampoco bajaba mucho la actividad. Podríamos especular que 1) podría haber habido mucha actividad en lugares como Asia y Australia (dónde como sabemos es de día en las horas "valle" de Europa/América), o bien 2) se habrán popularizado servicios automatizados que operaban las 24 horas para generar las transacciones Ordinals en el momento ideal, y probablemente hasta reaccionaban al mercado de las tarifas. Me parecía que siempre cuando las fees bajaban de los 40 sat/vbyte aumentaba el número de transacciones Ordinals, no importando la hora.
Que hacer, ahora está en 50k (dune) y el mem.pool tasa $9 (1.48 GB / 300 MB).
Ahora la causa es BR o una situación de ambos casos, ordinals+precio. Como decidir si mejora o empeora para realizar la transacción. No hay emergencia, pero frustra tener que pagar unos cuantos sat, cuando por un par de horas o bloques podriamos estar en menores tasas.
ni loco venderia mi bitcoin
Tendrás que hacerlo en algún momento.danadc
Se trata de si eres inversor, no de emociones o necesidades, incluso vender en este momento es una estrategia, el inverso del DCA, vender porciones cada nuevo precio y comprar cada nueva caída.
Gracias. Inquietud, las direcciones Segwit no tienen tal desventaja hoy, cuatro años después está bastante difundida y saber que 3 es mutifirma no cambia en nada mi decisión de enviar, supongo que es solo para entender como funciona. ¿Se puede decir que es el formato más usado?
ciberestafas: mediante bots de Telegram y con un sistema de 'afiliados'
https://www.genbeta.com/seguridad/asi-funciona-mayor-trama-global-ciberestafas-mediante-bots-telegram-sistema-afiliados
Durante el covid se afianzaron y estan en 79 paises y sus operaciones segun fuente, funciona en 251 marcas. Los ingresos rondan los $64 millones, entre el orgulloso curriculum estan 63 bancos, incluyendo algunos de España.
Si todo esto es verdad explica quizas varios casos, ya que ellos proveen un kit de phishing. La complicidad interna se fortalece con estas noticias.
Quote
La empresa de ciberseguridad Group-IB descubre una trama rusa de scam-as-a-service (una forma de subcontratación de cibercrimen, concretamente enfocada a las estafas) que usaba anuncios clasificados falsos y métodos de ingeniería social para convencer a las personas de que compraran bienes o servicios inexistentes.
Durante el covid se afianzaron y estan en 79 paises y sus operaciones segun fuente, funciona en 251 marcas. Los ingresos rondan los $64 millones, entre el orgulloso curriculum estan 63 bancos, incluyendo algunos de España.
Si todo esto es verdad explica quizas varios casos, ya que ellos proveen un kit de phishing. La complicidad interna se fortalece con estas noticias.