Search content
Sort by
Showing 3 of 3 results by airbus330
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6 (Linux / Windows)
I run 8 x 1070 in one rig, 6 x 1080Ti in one rig and 5 x 1080Ti in one rig. they all run together in their own rig build. I mean, I run zm batch to work 8x1070 together and others respectably in their own.
while running, the target difficulty is set by the server (any chance to achieve static difficulty through miner?). the target difficulty is somehow too high for the 1080Tis which in return I get only 7,5 - 10 shares per minute in average; that being said I get zero returns on payment on some blocks randomly.
but with the 1070s, even though they are %60 solutions capable against 1080Tis, I have around 60 shares per minute in average.
you can say that the size of the share 1080Tis get is larger than 1070, I agree, but it is like more than 6 times the share I get with 1080Tis. so considering the solution power of two, 6 times is much bigger than %60 solution power in between these two.
I've tried this while mining BTCG in suprnova and MPH. I think this is because the target difficulty setting.
while running, the target difficulty is set by the server (any chance to achieve static difficulty through miner?). the target difficulty is somehow too high for the 1080Tis which in return I get only 7,5 - 10 shares per minute in average; that being said I get zero returns on payment on some blocks randomly.
but with the 1070s, even though they are %60 solutions capable against 1080Tis, I have around 60 shares per minute in average.
you can say that the size of the share 1080Tis get is larger than 1070, I agree, but it is like more than 6 times the share I get with 1080Tis. so considering the solution power of two, 6 times is much bigger than %60 solution power in between these two.
I've tried this while mining BTCG in suprnova and MPH. I think this is because the target difficulty setting.
Honestly, I think you'll need to wait for a payout to see if you can see the earnings differences - looking at hash or share rate alone (particularly at the pool level!) to compare completely different rigs isn't going to be accurate. Earnings per rig is pretty much the only way to determine anything.
That said, if you're looking to have the same target difficulty across all your rigs, you might try running a mining proxy. Makes things slightly more efficient networking wise as well. I have recently created one that works with equihash (and other algos/coins) called aiostratum-proxy (see my signature as well).
thanks for your interest.
I speak of share numbers alone just to indicate the problem easier. other than that, I do check the earnings. for example in transaction history, 1080Tis get way low earnings despite their hash power. many shares in chunks surpasses low share numbers in larger -so to speak- amounts. that's why I ask about static target difficulty.
I will check your post, thank you.
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
I'm currently suffering from too much "server not responding - retrying..." while mining Equihash from 139.162.138.168:17023 (Actually a europe-equihash-hub address and the one giving me the lesser ping from the others). Do you guys also suffer this? I'm using DSTM miner with FarmWatchBot (Watchdog) and this is what my output is like. It is happening quite alot like every 15 mins:
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# zm 0.5.8
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1080 MB: 8192 PCI: 3:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU1 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 1:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU2 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 2:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU3 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 5:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU4 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 7:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU5 + GeForce GTX 1080 MB: 8192 PCI: 8:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# connected to: 139.162.138.168:17023
2018-04-11 22:48:08|# server set difficulty to: 001000000000000000000000...
2018-04-11 22:48:29|> GPU0 56C Sol/s: 570.8 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 570.8 I/s: 314.2 Sh: 2.99 . . +
2018-04-11 22:48:30|> GPU1 57C Sol/s: 484.8 Sol/W: 3.89 Avg: 484.8 I/s: 258.4 Sh: 2.99 . . +
2018-04-11 22:48:32|> GPU2 57C Sol/s: 491.1 Sol/W: 3.96 Avg: 491.1 I/s: 259.3 Sh: 8.95 . . +++
2018-04-11 22:48:34|> GPU3 57C Sol/s: 478.8 Sol/W: 3.92 Avg: 478.8 I/s: 255.4 Sh: 2.99 . . +
2018-04-11 22:48:36|> GPU4 58C Sol/s: 481.9 Sol/W: 3.94 Avg: 481.9 I/s: 251.0 Sh: 3.00 . . +
2018-04-11 22:48:38|> GPU5 58C Sol/s: 583.1 Sol/W: 3.56 Avg: 583.1 I/s: 313.9 Sh: 5.98 . . ++
2018-04-11 22:48:38| ========== Sol/s: 3090.6 Sol/W: 3.78 Avg: 3090.6 I/s: 1652.2 Sh: 26.90 . .
2018-04-11 22:48:39|# recv failed: 10054
2018-04-11 22:48:39|# reconnecting
2018-04-11 22:49:04|# server not responding - retrying...
2018-04-11 22:49:19|# server not responding - retrying...
2018-04-11 22:49:34|# server not responding - retrying...
2018-04-11 22:49:35|# connected to: 139.162.138.168:17023
2018-04-11 22:49:37|# server set difficulty to: 001000000000000000000000...
2018-04-11 22:49:58|> GPU0 57C Sol/s: 582.1 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 582.1 I/s: 313.9 Sh: 8.96 1.00 250 +++
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# zm 0.5.8
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1080 MB: 8192 PCI: 3:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU1 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 1:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU2 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 2:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU3 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 5:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU4 + GeForce GTX 1070 MB: 8192 PCI: 7:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# GPU5 + GeForce GTX 1080 MB: 8192 PCI: 8:0
2018-04-11 22:48:05|
2018-04-11 22:48:05|# connected to: 139.162.138.168:17023
2018-04-11 22:48:08|# server set difficulty to: 001000000000000000000000...
2018-04-11 22:48:29|> GPU0 56C Sol/s: 570.8 Sol/W: 3.43 Avg: 570.8 I/s: 314.2 Sh: 2.99 . . +
2018-04-11 22:48:30|> GPU1 57C Sol/s: 484.8 Sol/W: 3.89 Avg: 484.8 I/s: 258.4 Sh: 2.99 . . +
2018-04-11 22:48:32|> GPU2 57C Sol/s: 491.1 Sol/W: 3.96 Avg: 491.1 I/s: 259.3 Sh: 8.95 . . +++
2018-04-11 22:48:34|> GPU3 57C Sol/s: 478.8 Sol/W: 3.92 Avg: 478.8 I/s: 255.4 Sh: 2.99 . . +
2018-04-11 22:48:36|> GPU4 58C Sol/s: 481.9 Sol/W: 3.94 Avg: 481.9 I/s: 251.0 Sh: 3.00 . . +
2018-04-11 22:48:38|> GPU5 58C Sol/s: 583.1 Sol/W: 3.56 Avg: 583.1 I/s: 313.9 Sh: 5.98 . . ++
2018-04-11 22:48:38| ========== Sol/s: 3090.6 Sol/W: 3.78 Avg: 3090.6 I/s: 1652.2 Sh: 26.90 . .
2018-04-11 22:48:39|# recv failed: 10054
2018-04-11 22:48:39|# reconnecting
2018-04-11 22:49:04|# server not responding - retrying...
2018-04-11 22:49:19|# server not responding - retrying...
2018-04-11 22:49:34|# server not responding - retrying...
2018-04-11 22:49:35|# connected to: 139.162.138.168:17023
2018-04-11 22:49:37|# server set difficulty to: 001000000000000000000000...
2018-04-11 22:49:58|> GPU0 57C Sol/s: 582.1 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 582.1 I/s: 313.9 Sh: 8.96 1.00 250 +++
I have same problem.
europe.cryptonight-hub.miningpoolhub.com 172.104.247.21 ping 31 ms (server in Germany)
europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com 172.104.252.26 ping 31 ms (server in Germany)
europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com 172.104.127.76 ping 297 ms - (server in JAPAN!!!) wtf?
p.s.
LOL asia.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com - 139.162.138.168 ping 31 ms (server in Germany)
Support\DEV please check & fix it!
LOL I came here to ask this also.
so hilarious EU server in JAPAN FFS. please fix this. getting 300-500 ms of pings.
ASIA also won't work for me. my trace ends in SINGAPORE.
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6 (Linux / Windows)
hey there,
thanks for your work dstm. I'm gonna ask a question about not being able to achieve enough shares.
I run 8 x 1070 in one rig, 6 x 1080Ti in one rig and 5 x 1080Ti in one rig. they all run together in their own rig build. I mean, I run zm batch to work 8x1070 together and others respectably in their own.
while running, the target difficulty is set by the server (any chance to achieve static difficulty through miner?). the target difficulty is somehow too high for the 1080Tis which in return I get only 7,5 - 10 shares per minute in average; that being said I get zero returns on payment on some blocks randomly.
but with the 1070s, even though they are %60 solutions capable against 1080Tis, I have around 60 shares per minute in average.
you can say that the size of the share 1080Tis get is larger than 1070, I agree, but it is like more than 6 times the share I get with 1080Tis. so considering the solution power of two, 6 times is much bigger than %60 solution power in between these two.
I've tried this while mining BTCG in suprnova and MPH. I think this is because the target difficulty setting.
thanks,
thanks for your work dstm. I'm gonna ask a question about not being able to achieve enough shares.
I run 8 x 1070 in one rig, 6 x 1080Ti in one rig and 5 x 1080Ti in one rig. they all run together in their own rig build. I mean, I run zm batch to work 8x1070 together and others respectably in their own.
while running, the target difficulty is set by the server (any chance to achieve static difficulty through miner?). the target difficulty is somehow too high for the 1080Tis which in return I get only 7,5 - 10 shares per minute in average; that being said I get zero returns on payment on some blocks randomly.
but with the 1070s, even though they are %60 solutions capable against 1080Tis, I have around 60 shares per minute in average.
you can say that the size of the share 1080Tis get is larger than 1070, I agree, but it is like more than 6 times the share I get with 1080Tis. so considering the solution power of two, 6 times is much bigger than %60 solution power in between these two.
I've tried this while mining BTCG in suprnova and MPH. I think this is because the target difficulty setting.
thanks,