It will look like we asked for more money to complete the product. Replace "developer" with "marketer/supporter/promoter", please.

Lisk was a pretty crazy hype train investors will make money so they wont complain it is a scam.
It will prob die off some months after release though

I have not disappeared. The Gadgetcoin developers asked me if I support the GDC project publicly on this forum, then I should not be so hostile to other projects. Fair enough, point is taken on board. Therefore, I am focusing on what I am very good at. These are including but not limited to making women extremely happy and delighted in sex, playing in amateur golf tournaments and testing the newest collection of Scotch Whiskeys. I will let you all fine gentlemen know how these activities are going.

You obviously don't get me or don't want to get.

I was talking to the GadgetCoin devs while this was all going on. And I even advised them that CfB's implementation is probably legit. And I sort of leaned them towards not burning their bridges with Iota, even though David (iotatoken) is a hothead for threatening (in a private message) to sue me for simply writing my IANAL opinions/research about the implications of USA securities regulation.

Nevertheless I am sad to report that my conclusion after investigating is there is no money in IoT (now, maybe a decade from now but the corporations are looking for open source and open solution, not some proprietary token launched from scammy ICO). It is just another buzzword and these coins want to get endorsement from some big corporations, so they can go pump the tokens. I understand altcoinUK's expose on Iota could cause problems for such a marketing model.

I tried to see if we could do some collaboration around the Streemo code w.r.t. to my social networking plans. But it just doesn't seem to fit. So I had to just fall away from that discussion. The Gadget coin folks I was exposed to seemed to be ethical as far as I could tell.

I am interested in creating software that users use and I get feedback from them daily and they have feature requests for me. That is what I find rewarding. All these strategies for mining investors is so far removed from what I think software development is all about.

So I am almost out-of-here. Will finish up and bite my tongue and let go of this place...

GadgetCoin wasn't a scam, re-read my original post before jumping to the conclusion, wasn't it clear that I was talking about altcoinUK who attempted to use GadgetCoin as an instrument?

The dude has already owned a lot to pump coins he invested into. This is how he conducts scams like the one in GadgetCoin prevented by me.

Yea let that miserable loser wallow in his own misery. His delusions and lies are a combination of hilarious, sad and plain disturbing. I hope the mods put him in place soon.

But here I see that his lies has once again managed to melt in with the truth. The GUI was never specifically promised, CfB made a very rough GUI, we even put screenshots up here in early December, which lead people to suggest we should make a full GUI instead, which we decided was a good idea. This is when the GUI got started, not before. Not a single thing altcoinUK say is true, he just take tidbits of information and mix it with lies to make it seem like it is rooted in reality.

No idea where 'chat' even came from, we have never mentioned chat in the GUI, ever. So once again just a plain lie from the loser.

The GUI we are developing now does indeed have a 'Send Message' function so that you can send messages with your transaction (encrypted or not, your choice)

www.danwarfel.com is our current UI dev, he gave me 'Wednesday' as deliverable, then had some family issues which postponed it a couple of days, which has turned into 3 days. To be sure I am very displeased with both the first team we hired and Dan (though I still have hopes that Dan will deliver and come with an apology that is acceptable, because he has potential to be a great community member). Again this is just real life, not something anyone can control. The only way to control for these variables is to hire 5 teams to do the same task, which is of course lunacy as it would cost tens of thousands of dollars for a feature that isn't even core technology of IOTA.

People really need to stop letting trolls getting to their heads.

Disagree who? The shills, sockpuppets and "investors" disagree who really-really want to see their P&D works out and at the expense of naive/uninformed users which is the target audience of the P&D scam. Indeed the Belarusian attracts a large group of greedy individuals, "investors" and idiots. Also he promised the "investors" he will provide them with a handsome ROI. Predominantly those are who disagree with me. All sensible, honest and reasonable individuals with over IQ 80 understand that IOTA is a P&D scam.

As for the "reason", you remember what was the "reason" of rejecting my opinion about Moolah in 2014 in the Vericoin thread and IRC channel? The reason was that the cheerleaders, sockpuppets and shills thought the Moolah deal was game changer. Or more precisely they could market and P&D the coin with such game changer deal. I was disrupting the VRC P&D as well as I was interrupting the genius plan of the VRC devs with regards to collaborating with Moolah. I visited at the time to Moolah with my lawyer and then posted to VRC's IRC and thread what I understood about Moolah, Moolah is a pathetic scam, and the collaboration mustn't even considered. We contacted law enforcement and the game changer, innovative Ryan Kennedy is in prison now. The shills, sockpuppets and "investors" of IOTA argument is what a game changer and innovative solution they have. We heard that many times during a P&D operation.

Or the "reason" of why the shills, sockpuppets and "investors" of Bitbay disagreed with me in 2014 December? It was exactly same "reason" as the "reason" of the shills, sockpuppets and "investors" of IOTA: my unmoderated thread interrupted the scam and (together with barabbas' unmoderated thread) basically stopped the scam as Bob clashed with David in my thread. We contacted law enforcement and now the law enforcement handles the case. The organisers of the game changer, innovative, disruptive technology are subject of a law enforcement investigation, because it was a P&D scam and the game changer, innovative, disruptive technology existed only in the imagination and on the argument list of shills, sockpuppets and "investors".

The "reason" of the IOTA shills, sockpuppets and "investors" is clear: talk about innovative and disruptive technologies to realise as much profit via the P&D as they can. Regardless, of their "reason" blatant lies and P&D scams must stop and we need to let law enforcement handle such frauds - this is not a technology nor a business issue.

I copy here this before they delete it from the moderated thread, because like all scams do, they will realize soon that using so many sockpuppets is actually counter productive


LoL fing3rblist3r5 newbie sockpuppet is "gutted" he missed the initial offering. David, the IOTA CEO, the 24 years old business man is in action.

You really don't care about facts, do you?