Search content
Sort by
Showing 10 of 10 results by alexb___
Hello all,
I'm Alex, CG artist and video graphic designer. I'm mostly working for TV and fashion / luxe, but if your business needs nice looking video animations or stills, you'll be happy to know that I accept the money of the future: BTC
Take a look at my work and let me know!
my work :http://vimeo.com/couchmode/bouya/videos/sort:date/80006860
I'm Alex, CG artist and video graphic designer. I'm mostly working for TV and fashion / luxe, but if your business needs nice looking video animations or stills, you'll be happy to know that I accept the money of the future: BTC
Take a look at my work and let me know!
my work :http://vimeo.com/couchmode/bouya/videos/sort:date/80006860
Re: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - middlecoin.com
After the insane payouts of the last few days, I think many new comers will be unsatisfied with the NORMAL payouts going forward. I've been on middlecoin for a few months now and I know that the pool goes through a feast and famine cycles. We are/were in the feast cycle and I fear a famine cycle is coming.
+1Re: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - middlecoin.com
Can I use multiple rigs connected to the pool with the same wallet address?
yep!try with this one, i'll tel you: 13RxB7kSrhiw7F4vSLFSVcVrc6G3zQLC8R
Re: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - middlecoin.com
Panckage, are you suggesting making middlecoin into several pools and then spitting the miners up amongst them (such as middlecoin1, middlecoin2, middlecoin3) and having them all use middlecoin as the front end?
Yes that's it
I've been wondering why that isn't the default approach for awhile now.
It makes much more sense to spread out the hashing power over the top 4-5 coins, with weighting based on profitability (i.e. the 5 five coins could get: 30% then 25%, 20%, 15%, 10%). This way if the price drops on the coin you've been mining, the impact is much less.
It also utilizes the pool's hash rate better. For example let's say the target coin has a low hash rate around 50Mh/s, in this case allocating 100% of the pools 1.6Gh/s at the coin is no better than allocating 33% (around 500Mh/s), both will capture almost 100% of the coin's blocks, but this frees up hashrate for other coins as well.
This is a good idea if we are the only or major multipool. If other big pool only mine the highest profit coin, the highest weighting coin (most profitable) we are mining will also drop in profitability.
We can use a very small percentage of our hashing power for the lower difficulty but very profitable coins so that the difficulty will not rise dramatically.
H20, what do you think of this. And is it technicaly not to complicated? it could dramaticly improve incoms no?
Re: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - middlecoin.com
Panckage, are you suggesting making middlecoin into several pools and then spitting the miners up amongst them (such as middlecoin1, middlecoin2, middlecoin3) and having them all use middlecoin as the front end?
Yes that's it
I've been wondering why that isn't the default approach for awhile now.
It makes much more sense to spread out the hashing power over the top 4-5 coins, with weighting based on profitability (i.e. the 5 five coins could get: 30% then 25%, 20%, 15%, 10%). This way if the price drops on the coin you've been mining, the impact is much less.
It also utilizes the pool's hash rate better. For example let's say the target coin has a low hash rate around 50Mh/s, in this case allocating 100% of the pools 1.6Gh/s at the coin is no better than allocating 33% (around 500Mh/s), both will capture almost 100% of the coin's blocks, but this frees up hashrate for other coins as well.
brillant! if middlecoin don't do it 1st, others will do!
Can the difficulty go down as well?
I tink it depends of the coins. For bitcoin, it can not. even if you stop mining.