Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 264 results by antibanker
just to refute the notion that I am off mainstream on jew policy:
here is a wikileaks cable:
JEDDAH SHURA COUNCIL MEMBERS WEIGH IN ON ISRAEL,EDUCATION, AND LABOR REFORM - ONE CLAIMING THAT 80% OF ARABS SUPPORT IRAN'S NUCLEAR AMBITIONS
Iranian nukes are necessary to take care of the jewish peril.
Senator Corzine (MF Global deposits thief): 2006 December 15,
4. (C) Sneh charged that the USG sent the wrong signal to
the Iranian government by closing the Washington office of
the Mujahadeen e-Khalq (MEK / MKO). Sneh contended that the group no
longer merits inclusion on the U.S. list of terrorist
organizations because, he said, it had committed no terrorist
acts since killing Americans in the 1970s. The "easiest way"
to send a strong signal to the Iranian government that the
USG is serious about its demands would be to remove the
terrorist designation from the Iranian opposition group and
allow it to reopen its Washington offices. He said the group
has strong popular backing in the U.S. and Europe, having
brought 15,000 supporters to Washington for a demonstration.
Sneh said that he raised this issue with then-Under Secretary
Grossman when Sneh was last in Washington.
4. (C) Sneh charged that the USG sent the wrong signal to
the Iranian government by closing the Washington office of
the Mujahadeen e-Khalq (MEK / MKO). Sneh contended that the group no
longer merits inclusion on the U.S. list of terrorist
organizations because, he said, it had committed no terrorist
acts since killing Americans in the 1970s. The "easiest way"
to send a strong signal to the Iranian government that the
USG is serious about its demands would be to remove the
terrorist designation from the Iranian opposition group and
allow it to reopen its Washington offices. He said the group
has strong popular backing in the U.S. and Europe, having
brought 15,000 supporters to Washington for a demonstration.
Sneh said that he raised this issue with then-Under Secretary
Grossman when Sneh was last in Washington.
Re: Should a Jewish resturant owner be forced to serve a skinhead?
Jews had been living in Germany for much longer than there even was a Germany.
Germany exist multiple times longer than friggin' Jewland, whose history may be over any time in the near future, Inshallah.
Russian depositors begin seizing property of Cypriot banks - LOL !
rt.com:
A Russian depositor has filed suit for the seizure of all assets in Russia belonging to Laiki Bank of Cyprus, including its controlling stake in Russias Rosprombank, which may now hamper a Cypriot plan to sell off the shares.
Presnensky Court in Moscow has received a lawsuit from Y. G. Borisov against Laiki Bank which operates in Russia under the Cyprus Popular Bank brand and Rosprombank, in which Cyprus owns a 50.4 percent stake.
Borisov has demanded the repayment of money that was seized from his account with the Cypriot bank; the exact sum was not disclosed. Laiki Banks shares in Rosprombanks parent company RBP-Holding have been seized, along with all of Laiki Banks financial assets n Rosprombank, in order to secure the claim.
At the end of March, Cypriot authorities announced that Laiki Bank the countrys second-largest would be restructured and closed in as part of a 10-billion bailout deal with the European Union.
According to the deal, Laiki Bank account holders will see an undetermined amount of their deposits over 100,000 converted into bank shares; whether those sums will be returned depends on the results of a sale of the banks assets.
Laiki Banks share of Rosprombank must also be sold, and Cyprus is currently in talks with Mikhail Nikolaev, the owner of the remaining RBP-Holding stock. However, the asset seizure now puts the transaction in question.
The seizure of the Cypriot banks assets will remain in place until it is canceled by a higher judicial authority.
Were talking about a share of a foreign bank in the Russian bank, and if itll be levied there may be a conflict of jurisdictions, and nobody knows how its going to be settled, Vladimir Pletnev, a partner at Justina law firm, told Vedomosti newspaper.
Pletnev also hinted that more suits against Cypriot banks will follow, the majority of which will be filed by individuals. It will ultimately be impossible to satisfy all of the depositors demands, so those who go to court first will get the biggest piece of the pie, he explained.
Borisov is not the first Russian to sue a Cypriot bank: Earlier, the Algebra firm from Novosibirsk launched legal action against the Bank of Cyprus, demanding a refund of 380 million rubles (about $12.3 million).
The EU bailout deal calls for a levy of up to 60 percent on deposits over 100,000 in the Bank of Cyprus, which holds 80 percent of shares in Russias Uniastrum Bank.
Russian citizens and multinational corporations have suffered the most from the financial crisis in Cyprus, as they have notoriously used the Mediterranean island as a tax haven over the last decade.
A Russian depositor has filed suit for the seizure of all assets in Russia belonging to Laiki Bank of Cyprus, including its controlling stake in Russias Rosprombank, which may now hamper a Cypriot plan to sell off the shares.
Presnensky Court in Moscow has received a lawsuit from Y. G. Borisov against Laiki Bank which operates in Russia under the Cyprus Popular Bank brand and Rosprombank, in which Cyprus owns a 50.4 percent stake.
Borisov has demanded the repayment of money that was seized from his account with the Cypriot bank; the exact sum was not disclosed. Laiki Banks shares in Rosprombanks parent company RBP-Holding have been seized, along with all of Laiki Banks financial assets n Rosprombank, in order to secure the claim.
At the end of March, Cypriot authorities announced that Laiki Bank the countrys second-largest would be restructured and closed in as part of a 10-billion bailout deal with the European Union.
According to the deal, Laiki Bank account holders will see an undetermined amount of their deposits over 100,000 converted into bank shares; whether those sums will be returned depends on the results of a sale of the banks assets.
Laiki Banks share of Rosprombank must also be sold, and Cyprus is currently in talks with Mikhail Nikolaev, the owner of the remaining RBP-Holding stock. However, the asset seizure now puts the transaction in question.
The seizure of the Cypriot banks assets will remain in place until it is canceled by a higher judicial authority.
Were talking about a share of a foreign bank in the Russian bank, and if itll be levied there may be a conflict of jurisdictions, and nobody knows how its going to be settled, Vladimir Pletnev, a partner at Justina law firm, told Vedomosti newspaper.
Pletnev also hinted that more suits against Cypriot banks will follow, the majority of which will be filed by individuals. It will ultimately be impossible to satisfy all of the depositors demands, so those who go to court first will get the biggest piece of the pie, he explained.
Borisov is not the first Russian to sue a Cypriot bank: Earlier, the Algebra firm from Novosibirsk launched legal action against the Bank of Cyprus, demanding a refund of 380 million rubles (about $12.3 million).
The EU bailout deal calls for a levy of up to 60 percent on deposits over 100,000 in the Bank of Cyprus, which holds 80 percent of shares in Russias Uniastrum Bank.
Russian citizens and multinational corporations have suffered the most from the financial crisis in Cyprus, as they have notoriously used the Mediterranean island as a tax haven over the last decade.
die Börse wurde das Opfer einer Attacke: LOL
###########
Our Service is momentarily not available.
1. All funds (EUR, USD, PLN, GBP & Bitcoins) are safe.
2. All withdrawals will be gradually processed chronologically from another bank account.
3. The Polish authority closed your Bank account in Poland.
4. Our lawyers are working with high pressure on a solution.
We will back with Bitcoin-24 2.0 on when all declarations are finished.
All important Emails can be send to help@bitcoin-24.com
actually, the jews started lying about Persian nukes in 1974 already. from project K, wikileaks:
4. ACCORDING TO AN AFP ITEM, THE IRANIAN EMBASSY HERE
ISSUED A STATEMENT JUNE 24 DENYING THAT THE SHAH
INTENDED TO GIVE IRAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
"THIS INFORMATION IS TOTALLY INVENTED AND WITHOUT ANY BASIS WHATSO-
EVER", THE EMBASSY SAID, SPECIFYING THAT THE SHAH HAD
NEVER MADE A STATEMENT THAT COULD BE INTERPRETED IN THAT
SENSE.
