@robomed - you will be interested that in September 2016, there was a national Blockchain in Healthcare Workshop in Washington DC, jointly sponsored by ONC (Office of the National Coordinator for Healthcare IT) and NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). Over 90 papers were submitted for presentation, and 70 of them were published by ONC, and 15 of them received monetary awards for further development. Institutions submitting projects for consideration included MIT, Mayo Clinic, UCSD, UCLA, Deloitte, Cigna, IBM, Merck, Accenture, Intel, Accenture. Also many projects were proposed by independent healthcare providers and developers. Here is a link to the 70 publications:
https://oncprojectracking.healthit.gov/wiki/display/TechLabI/Blockchain+Challenge+on+ONC+Tech+LabThere was also a Blockchain in Healthcare Code-A-Thon at Georgetown University in April 2017, links to further info:
https://oncprojectracking.healthit.gov/wiki/display/TechLabI/The+Blockchain+in+Healthcare+Code-A-Thonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XS_-mT72M20As an attendee at the Sept 2016 Workshop, I noted that most of the projects were to promote private, permissioned blockchains, for the use of individual healthcare institutions. Personally, I think a more valuable approach would be the development of public blockchains for the use of all patients and healthcare providers.
The project I am working on uses an existing, established public blockchain to allow users to delegate permissions for existing health portals privately: between patients, healthcare providers, and other caregivers, adhering to HIPAA standards. The desired outcome of the project is to preserve existing health IT infrastructure (such as existing EHR systems, and existing data and imaging storage), but leverage mandated health IT portals and EHR APIs so that apps can be created that collate heath data universally across multiple platforms.