Search content
Sort by
Showing 14 of 14 results by arpika
Re: [ANN] ccminer 1.8.3 with sia, lyra2 and lbry boost - opensource (tpruvot)
Hi,
I have some problems with 1.8.3 version.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7dIBlic6LXsck1WN1RIWmtyNXM/view?usp=sharing
After this error I have to reboot since CUDA devices disappeared.
Ubuntu 16.04, CUDA 8, 2*NVidia 1070
Lbry algo is OK so ccminer is working.
I have some problems with 1.8.3 version.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7dIBlic6LXsck1WN1RIWmtyNXM/view?usp=sharing
After this error I have to reboot since CUDA devices disappeared.
Ubuntu 16.04, CUDA 8, 2*NVidia 1070
Lbry algo is OK so ccminer is working.
Hi,
I have just strated to use sia GUI wallet. Positive transactions are OK but I haven't sent any coins so what is that negative transaction?
And what is the zero transaction?
thx
2106.9391 SC 6f41954c81eb278a1004656d2ac63e2c788c766203a308c4075b844f4578e0f0 Confirmed
2161.2914 SC a197f222f24125772a72fea6113f7ddd1a9c25053c86a45a078883104b8aa3b0 Confirmed
0 SC 33a8fa5b5da0327dd77267366e75f33eb08750fcb7b62c22ecdf07dbb0434d8c Confirmed
-6010 SC d4134f1385616f966dffaca6b8f5fda3d86041fe5d77803bbbed4732ca3d6132 Confirmed
3215 SC bb3e8de28b833a30e16acff5aa167535f1c56d63b10bc82ba1aa874a918e0d6c Confirmed
3256 SC baeee6d78e36dce92aaa5eb10981f83eaec825585cd2d2fbca9b630876a01308 Confirmed
I have just strated to use sia GUI wallet. Positive transactions are OK but I haven't sent any coins so what is that negative transaction?
And what is the zero transaction?
thx
2106.9391 SC 6f41954c81eb278a1004656d2ac63e2c788c766203a308c4075b844f4578e0f0 Confirmed
2161.2914 SC a197f222f24125772a72fea6113f7ddd1a9c25053c86a45a078883104b8aa3b0 Confirmed
0 SC 33a8fa5b5da0327dd77267366e75f33eb08750fcb7b62c22ecdf07dbb0434d8c Confirmed
-6010 SC d4134f1385616f966dffaca6b8f5fda3d86041fe5d77803bbbed4732ca3d6132 Confirmed
3215 SC bb3e8de28b833a30e16acff5aa167535f1c56d63b10bc82ba1aa874a918e0d6c Confirmed
3256 SC baeee6d78e36dce92aaa5eb10981f83eaec825585cd2d2fbca9b630876a01308 Confirmed
Re: [POOL] YAAMP.COM multipool multialgo profit switch with exchange
Need help...
I haven't received any transactions for at least 18 hours.
Coin: Amsterdamcoin
Wallet: AebwGR6iicgipBWwXd8FEMRcNzSc7ApuH3
txid=05fa2397336da1c90f21e7df87ec128d30ca705f465f988fafb2be7cf96f2e4b
txid=5aae6962c3773c3002ee8f0bbd45777c4931c25db811b6af903504aa6d3bb938
txid=5a9c95f268954ff352909db82fc823dcd9b5701059e57008aaa6915b7c6bfb6c
txid=161e5942d4dea7a5be21e572a61a4b2f7d47db3564d909f942c21838bb1c8429
thx
I haven't received any transactions for at least 18 hours.
Coin: Amsterdamcoin
Wallet: AebwGR6iicgipBWwXd8FEMRcNzSc7ApuH3
txid=05fa2397336da1c90f21e7df87ec128d30ca705f465f988fafb2be7cf96f2e4b
txid=5aae6962c3773c3002ee8f0bbd45777c4931c25db811b6af903504aa6d3bb938
txid=5a9c95f268954ff352909db82fc823dcd9b5701059e57008aaa6915b7c6bfb6c
txid=161e5942d4dea7a5be21e572a61a4b2f7d47db3564d909f942c21838bb1c8429
thx
Maybe I discovered some type of error...
After pool has solved some blocks very quickly ccminer hashrate drops radically and one of my cards stops (in this case #1)
Although one card stopped accepted hasrate is the same by ccminer. Pool hasrate drops so one card has really stopped.
Default speed, no -g, linux, 6*750ti.
http://s5.postimg.org/6dsaphgh3/ccm.jpg
I think this is only about quark algo.
After pool has solved some blocks very quickly ccminer hashrate drops radically and one of my cards stops (in this case #1)
Although one card stopped accepted hasrate is the same by ccminer. Pool hasrate drops so one card has really stopped.
Default speed, no -g, linux, 6*750ti.
http://s5.postimg.org/6dsaphgh3/ccm.jpg
I think this is only about quark algo.
With the latest build hashrate is really high according to ccminer. (quark algo, yaamp, linux, 970/750ti rig, 50 and 52 capability)
Yaamp reports similar hashrate first but for a longer period the hashrate is lower compared to the eg. 43 version.
Hashrate reported by yaamp is lower even without -g parameter but with -g the difference is more significant. I tried with -g 3, -g 4, without intensity setting and with -i 22, I increased difficulty but the result was same.
Yaamp reports similar hashrate first but for a longer period the hashrate is lower compared to the eg. 43 version.
Hashrate reported by yaamp is lower even without -g parameter but with -g the difference is more significant. I tried with -g 3, -g 4, without intensity setting and with -i 22, I increased difficulty but the result was same.
Some longer interval tests...
My 970/750ti test rig (linux, quark algo, 0.1 diff) reports ~27M with -g 3 setting now. It was 19M without -g parameter. But yaamp reports lower hashrate! It is about the half of the hasrate reported by ccminer. (13M vs 27M)
My 970/750ti test rig (linux, quark algo, 0.1 diff) reports ~27M with -g 3 setting now. It was 19M without -g parameter. But yaamp reports lower hashrate! It is about the half of the hasrate reported by ccminer. (13M vs 27M)
when you build yourself you need to make sure that you have compute5_2 in the makefile. Compute 5.0 will cause invalid hash on compute 5.2 cards for some reason.
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\"
nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\"
I compiled that way
You also suggested to lower the priority. I reduced the nice level by 5 (from 0 to +5) but same performance.
Some longer interval tests...
My 970/750ti test rig (linux, quark algo, 0.1 diff) reports ~27M with -g 3 setting now. It was 19M without -g parameter. But yaamp reports lower hashrate! It is about the half of the hasrate reported by ccminer. (13M vs 27M)
So the accepted hasrate decreased by 30%
It is a 3 hours average.
The situation is almost the same with -g 2 setting.
But as I recognized acceptance rate is 100%!
My 970/750ti test rig (linux, quark algo, 0.1 diff) reports ~27M with -g 3 setting now. It was 19M without -g parameter. But yaamp reports lower hashrate! It is about the half of the hasrate reported by ccminer. (13M vs 27M)
So the accepted hasrate decreased by 30%
It is a 3 hours average.The situation is almost the same with -g 2 setting.
But as I recognized acceptance rate is 100%!
LINUX COMPILE ERROR --
I also get a compile error:
http://s1.postimg.org/basdqn6cv/error.png
Something about conflicting types in line 696 of scrypt.c and line 354 of miner.h?
I can hardly wait to try it, sp_ . Thanks for your work! --scryptr
I also get a compile error:
http://s1.postimg.org/basdqn6cv/error.png
Something about conflicting types in line 696 of scrypt.c and line 354 of miner.h?
I can hardly wait to try it, sp_ . Thanks for your work! --scryptr
Getting the same build error (linux, CUDA 6.5)
Some tests...
A test machine with one 970 and one 750ti, Ubuntu 14.04, ccminer 45, quark algo, compiled with both 50/52 capability
default config (without -d and -g parameters): no performance increase and validate errors
-d 0 -g 2 (only 970 runs): 35% performance increase, no errors
-d 1 -g 2 (only 750ti runs): no performance increase and validate errors
A test machine with one 970 and one 750ti, Ubuntu 14.04, ccminer 45, quark algo, compiled with both 50/52 capability
default config (without -d and -g parameters): no performance increase and validate errors
-d 0 -g 2 (only 970 runs): 35% performance increase, no errors
-d 1 -g 2 (only 750ti runs): no performance increase and validate errors
Re: Unitus (UIS): 1st multi-auxPoW [X11/Blake/Skein/Qubit/Yescrypt] BlakeP2Pool Live
I haven't received any coins from http://uk.p2pool.geek.nz:5567 for 5 hours.
Pool is up, my miner is working. Is this just my problem or...?
Pool is up, my miner is working. Is this just my problem or...?
Re: [ANN] [GRS] GroestlCoin: First Grøstl | PoW/PoS | Democratizing Mining | AES acc
Just update my wallet, avast detect malware from wallet file, download from website...
I have this problem too. What I have to do?