Search content
Sort by

Showing 13 of 13 results by asUHWEceyc
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 17/07/2025, 14:49:13 UTC
These bulls always end with unsustainable buying- even 21. Is 150-200k even overheated right now with all moving averages advancing so gradually thus far? Wen llama?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 16/05/2025, 03:43:42 UTC
how many wholecorners are there? probably less than 21m
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 01/03/2025, 06:26:41 UTC
So... it is a Friday night, and I am feeling loquacious.  And no, that does not mean drubk.  Or Drumpt.  On Whisskey or anything else... sue me.  pip paf poofle.

If I were not lazy I could dig around and find a post where i said something along the lines of "...Until the powers that be figure out that ETH (or ETH like chains) will allow them to print all the digital money they want".

And much more recently I warned that the ETFs were a mixed blessing. Increasing adoption at the cost of centralization of holdings... following as similar pattern as gold.

A couple months or 3 back I said something on NOSTR along the lines of "prepare yourself to hear big 'maxi' type talking heads to start to front for 'stable coins'".

*sigh*

As much as I love to be right from a sort of egotistic view... I wish I was wrong.

That said.  We are not in the absolute woods.  The powers that be are taking a foothold for sure.  But they are also realizing there is a strong incentive to keep bolstering the network now that they are invested.  Think of the prior example of miner manufacturers "testing" their chips by "burning them in for months" lol.  Butterfly labs..  Bitmain.

And now people like Saylor and Lummis are inching towards the idea of issuing "stable coins" to save the USD.  And this mean ETH opr Solana or whatever other shitcoin centralized garbage is in vogue.   And maybe also BTC on LND? ( https://web.archive.org/web/20241201051720/https://www.weforum.org/organizations/lightning-labs/ )  It looks a lot like this is where we are going.

Ultimately all this does nothing other than change timeliness, and offer opportunities.

Bitcoin will never stop being king.  And more money coming into the digital realm means more money to get parked in the corn.  

Eventually.

Ok... loquacious mode off.  Read and merit (or hate) before i delete it lol.

dollar your mother if you want dollar

-donald dorsey, blockstream ceo
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 07/04/2020, 14:16:33 UTC

Dear Doomsayers,

Shorters at the halving pandemic have a 100% mortality rate to date.

Good luck!
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 30/03/2020, 14:33:02 UTC
- People remain at home.
- Those who are carriers can't spread the virus to other people.
- Those who don't have it can't get it.
- In total isolation with 100% follow-through rate, it would only take 14-28 days for the problem to subside completely.
- Seeing as how that is not a viable alternative, I think 60 days of fairly stringent quarantine measures is reasonable. People do have to go out to get food and supplies, and people do have to be present at workplaces to deliver them.
- Everybody else whose employment is deemed non-essential will suffer financially.
- A relatively large amount of people are going to die from inadequate medical care.

This is the best case scenario.

Do you disagree with any of these premises or conclusions?

- Shutting down the US economy for 6+ weeks will destroy a majority of small->medium businesses and raise da unemployment thru da roof

who benefits?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 28/03/2020, 15:58:06 UTC
⭐ Merited by LFC_Bitcoin (1)
Quote from: bitcoinvest
How long you people think we will be under quarantine ?

46 days (roughly, average)

Yeah, I agree. In 2017, I was getting phone calls from friends of friends asking for advice about whether to invest in BTC and a range of alts popular at the time. I was shocked by their lack of knowledge. Yes, just wanting a get-rich-quick scheme, an approach which backfired on all of them. I did months of research back in 2013 - it paid off - and I guess I assumed everyone else would do the same. I was proved wrong. Thankfully to their detriment and not mine.

this market wears the scalps of gutless noobs once every 4 years

Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 24/03/2020, 15:01:37 UTC
5000ea stimulus distributed through new FEDCOIN

Quote from: NotLambchop
CUT YOUR LOOSE!!1
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Merits 3 from 2 users
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 19/03/2020, 15:52:29 UTC
⭐ Merited by LFC_Bitcoin (2) ,JayJuanGee (1)
Think what you want about COVID19.

The current crisis is actively being used to :

eliminate HK, Iran, France, etc protests
decimate short term economic activity, creating debt demand for individuals and overextended businesses that wish to continue operations
global QE-infinity, an attempt to spark real price inflation
create new laws without scrutiny
trial balloon physical&psychological submission ("social distancing")
pay selected winners (airlines, pharma, tp manufacturers, banks of course, etc)
distract from, justify, and create popular clamor for market manipulation (see above)
dislocate discussion of the above via direction to controlled, virtual platforms


1M USD is pessimistic in the medium to long term : currently observing 5778
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 17/03/2020, 04:40:07 UTC
wut if

we hit a new low

AND

mcafee ends up right ?

5000ea stimulus distributed through new FEDCOIN
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 15/03/2020, 15:39:38 UTC
are yellow vests still protesting?
do honkeys still riot?
sheep, easily TPed
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
asUHWEceyc
on 13/12/2019, 14:32:47 UTC
explain

In a long shameful convoluted story, I find myself with a new tricked out MacBook Pro 16", and a Time Machine brain transplant from the last machine. Not yet fully cloned. New MBP runs only Catalina. Apple has seen fit to -- get this -- prevent users from writing to the root directory of the filesystem.

Now I need to figure out how I want to map a nearly four-decade-old directory structure to the absurd dictates of my new environ.

jojo69's hell may be different - dunno.

Good news, everyone.

While it is not really well documented, there is a workaround.

Apple has created a new type of symlink-like filesystem construct. Using this synthetic link, one can create a 'ghost link' in the root of the filesystem. This link can redirect to another place in your filesystem, like any normal symlink. It does not, however, exist on disk. It is instantiated at boot. One configures these links through an fstab-like mechanism: a new file /etc/synthetic.conf.

After creating a link using this mechanism and rebooting, my filesystem looks like it used to. I am now happily restoring over 400,000 files -- over 220GB -- from Time Machine to this new phantom filesystem location. So all my old scripts and such should work just fine.

More info at man synthetic.conf.

Why Apple's second-level support was utterly unaware of this workaround is a mystery. But there you go.

how do you feel about macos being slowly and now rapidly disfigured into a cellular phone-home applianceOS ?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Calling top at $16500 (Even Newer!: $2483 bottom 19 Feb 2021 MtGox said so!)
by
asUHWEceyc
on 15/06/2019, 21:24:33 UTC
Let us assume a miner decides to roll back segregated witness on what is presently the most valuable chain.  
There is a non-zero chance of this happening- one which Core-ists seem never to discuss as a looming concern or even a possibility. In fact, it is generally waived away as BCash FUDsterism.

Given this outcome ,

*All segwit coins become miner property or are hence effectively burned, significantly reducing existing supply
*Reversing the attack would negate immutability


The culpable miners would, of course, have advance knowledge of such an attack and could prepare accordingly- both in trading the markets and hoarding segwit-free coin.

I would like to know how during this hypothetical scenario, from your perspective, miners might decide to support BitcoinSV's doubly forked ledger as the true chain rather than a de-segwitted BTC, when avoiding segwit on the majority chain has been an option all along? It would require something like a total market confidence loss in both halves of the newly split chain for such a switch to make sensible mining economics.

Regarding your current analysis of an extended bear market on the horizon : I believe this would require the above scenario playing out, as we've already seen an 85% correction and time scales relative to previous cycles have been stretched considerably. Indeed, the despair phase may have been internalized by $4 ripple-buying hordes who sold everything at a near total loss last winter and most certainly do not visit this forum.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: The Barry Silbert segwit agreement with >80% miner agreement.
by
asUHWEceyc
on 10/06/2017, 16:38:22 UTC
eulogy is written on the wall for large mining co.s... not much room for imrpovement below 16nm, which require huge capital investment. to avoid going bust they must
A-squeeze money by cartel changing protocol (aint gonna happen)
B-observe massive price increase

i say more cos go bust in 2-3 years, equip disperses somewhat