Search content
Sort by
Showing 4 of 4 results by asymmetricMustache
if the tokens are not sold out in the presale I will invest on grid+... ICO on october 30th.. the problem is that for the presale you need to invest a minimum of 50k dollars.
I am also paying attention in upcoming auctus.org presale, i think they don't have a minimum investment and they already have a product being developed
I was looking at Centra but I don't think it is a good reason to invest just because mayweather advertised about it
I am also paying attention in upcoming auctus.org presale, i think they don't have a minimum investment and they already have a product being developed
I was looking at Centra but I don't think it is a good reason to invest just because mayweather advertised about it
Chronologic
Actually I am not sure if it qualifies as a scam, since you could see from their whitepaper that they had nothing to offer, just made up a useless token to raise money.
They sold a useless token that the only function is to generate more tokens with the passing of time. they created a self moderated thread here in the forum and deleted every message pointing their problems.
they had the ico without the contract of the token (you basically could send them eth and get nothing in return) and were able to raise over 6 million dollars.
some days after the ico they decided to actually develop the token but they made a mistake in the deploy, so they had to recreate it after the token was already being traded.
it has been one month since the ico and investors got nothing. the chronologic team even messed up the contract deploy and had to issue two versions of the token already: https://blog.chronologic.network/2nd-deployment-of-day-686dd4f058b7
I don't know if it was a scam or a joke
Actually I am not sure if it qualifies as a scam, since you could see from their whitepaper that they had nothing to offer, just made up a useless token to raise money.
They sold a useless token that the only function is to generate more tokens with the passing of time. they created a self moderated thread here in the forum and deleted every message pointing their problems.
they had the ico without the contract of the token (you basically could send them eth and get nothing in return) and were able to raise over 6 million dollars.
some days after the ico they decided to actually develop the token but they made a mistake in the deploy, so they had to recreate it after the token was already being traded.
it has been one month since the ico and investors got nothing. the chronologic team even messed up the contract deploy and had to issue two versions of the token already: https://blog.chronologic.network/2nd-deployment-of-day-686dd4f058b7
I don't know if it was a scam or a joke
it is difficult to separate the actual good ICOs from the ones people are recommending here just because it is on their signature or because they are involved.
I like to track ICOs from this site: https://foundico.com/
I wanted to participate in the grid+ presale, but you need to contribute with at least 50,000 USD. so I will wait for the ICO in october 30th.
i will also keep an eye on datum, bakera, auctus, comsa and maybe monaize because I really like the komodo development team, they are very active.
I like to track ICOs from this site: https://foundico.com/
I wanted to participate in the grid+ presale, but you need to contribute with at least 50,000 USD. so I will wait for the ICO in october 30th.
i will also keep an eye on datum, bakera, auctus, comsa and maybe monaize because I really like the komodo development team, they are very active.
Re: Which ICO was the WORST and the SHITTIEST in the history of crypto?
We're creating the token that we will be distributing to people who invested in the shitty ICOs. Here is the info:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2174052.0
For the very first distribution we would like to pick absolutely the worst and the most shitty ICO in the history of crypto.
Which ICO was the worst?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2174052.0
For the very first distribution we would like to pick absolutely the worst and the most shitty ICO in the history of crypto.
Which ICO was the worst?
my vote is for chronologic
it was very funny actually.. they sold a useless token that the only function is to generate more tokens with the passing of time. they created a self moderated thread here in the forum and deleted every message pointing their problems.
they had the ico without the contract of the token (you basically could send them eth and get nothing in return) and were able to raise over 6 million dollars.
some days after the ico they decided to actually develop the token but they made a mistake in the deploy, so they had to recreate it after the token was already being traded.
the most fun about all that was that their token is called DAY and after the need to redeploy the contract because of the mistake, they changed the old ticker to YESTERDAY and created a new DAY token
of course, there have been worse ICOs than chronologic, but I believe that they were the one that raised more money within the shittiest