Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 222 results by atavacron
Use https://gyft.com . You can pay with Bitcoin to buy a Google Play gift card.
https://www.gyft.com/buy-gift-cards/google-play/
https://www.gyft.com/buy-gift-cards/google-play/
Re: (VOUCHED) #METHOD# VCC working with veryifing Paypal (expuse) and Google Cloud
Hey bro,
Does this method work in the US?
The reason I ask is that I found a couple other methods that use Android Apps to get a VCC but because the phone is registered to a US carrier it will not let me create a VCC. I've tried VPNs and Proxies on the phone but no go.
Thanks.
Does this method work in the US?
The reason I ask is that I found a couple other methods that use Android Apps to get a VCC but because the phone is registered to a US carrier it will not let me create a VCC. I've tried VPNs and Proxies on the phone but no go.
Thanks.
Re: 5 Events AWS Combo Pack-5 | 1200$ Credits | Valid 31 Dec 2017 | Stackable
Quote
NOTE:
* All AWS credit codes are legit and taken from tech events.
* All AWS credit codes are legit and taken from tech events.
Bullshit. So why Amazon canceled all codes??
Can you provide proof? I'm not saying that you are making it up but I'd like to know as well.
All of the codes that I have bought are still in my account and the Amazon rep that I spoke to last week had no issues when looking at my account.
Thanks.
Re: 5 Events AWS Combo Pack-5 | 1200$ Credits | Valid 31 Dec 2017 | Stackable
btc disabled?
Yeah, something isn't working right. I bought from PokemonGoArena before with no problem but Selly is not playing nice with BTC right now.
still have?
Invite codes are back at working state but seems impossible to get. I still have a way to make accounts though so check first page for details on how to get.
Thanks monsterim. Both accounts worked as promised.
Re: [ANN] Sia - Decentralized Storage - Working Beta - Launches June 7th, 2015
Everyone seeing confirmed coin payouts lately? all my miners are really at it today showing high amounts of blocks found, I know that's not accurate all, but never seen it this bad. mining on 5 rigs. I continually restart miners when I see it happening. Not sure if even though we see bogus blocks found that if somewhere in there, there is real blocks being found?
Dev did you say you were going to release a more efficient miner today?
Dev did you say you were going to release a more efficient miner today?
Yeah. On my gpu it's running about 6x as fast. Also we fixed the crashing and the fast-block stuff. (at least, mostly fixed it). So, sometime tonight once we've cleaned everything up a bit you can expect a release that addresses many of the problems people were having.
After pulled gpuminer git and compile
Give this
Code:
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
Rebuild 'siad'
Hix, did you find a fix to the the issue? I am having zero luck compiling "siad" on Ubuntu 14.04.
Re: [ANN] Sia - Decentralized Storage - Working Beta - Launches June 7th, 2015
So I was mining on two computers all night. I didn't mean to but I now see I was mining both on the same wallet. Now one wallet has a balance and the other still does not even though the address shows the same? Anyone tell me what happened?
When you mine a block, it adds an address to your wallet, so even though the two wallets share some addresses, any mining-related addresses created after you copied the wallet from one to the other are only stored in the wallet from the daemon that mined the block.
For example, I ran EC2 instances which all had the same 'wallet' (created an AMI), but each's wallet changed once they mined a block, and each had a different balance.
@Vorksholk What instance type did you use? I guess spot instances might not be good to use since the mined block will not be shared with the common wallet?
Re: [TNG] >>>> TURING <<<< [FRESH Algo] [ANON CHAT] [STEALTH] [NETWORK TRAFFIC]
I had some trouble compiling the Linux QT version.
I was getting odd errors in the file "statisticspage.cpp". But after some research, I believe that I solved the problem.
Just change line 95 in statisticspage.cpp:
from this
Code:
QString qVolume = QLocale(QLocale::English).toString(volume);
to this
Code:
QString qVolume = QLocale(QLocale::English).toString(int(volume));
and compile with QT5.
Does anyone have a working addnode? This wallet will not sync, no matter how I try.
The DNSSeed, 62.210.125.50, is alive but doesn't seem to help.
The DNSSeed, 62.210.125.50, is alive but doesn't seem to help.
Try adding 85.214.95.177
That did the trick. Thanks nihilnegativum!
Update: Here are some of my peers if you need them (just add to your .conf file).
addnode=85.214.95.177:20371
addnode=86.151.111.217:49250
addnode=188.166.9.213:38164
addnode=213.143.93.198:59027
addnode=204.11.237.233:38719
addnode=76.90.105.71:37641
addnode=62.116.254.204:57107
addnode=62.116.254.204:54360
addnode=85.25.214.214:53479
Re: [ANN] CRAVE 1st POS Masternodes | Dark Assets | Markets Soon =Embrace The Dark=
Thanks rocoro. I used the following to build the QT version. It worked like a charm.
Welcome...! did the qt version sync ok for you ? Or did it stick at 32712
Yeah, it sync'd without a glitch. I'm at Block 40171.
Re: [ANN] CRAVE 1st POS Masternodes | Dark Assets | Markets Soon =Embrace The Dark=
Getting this when trying to compile daemon with latest secp256k1 installed:
I'm assuming because as was mentioned, crave daemon does not currently support latest secp256k1 ?
Code:
key.cpp:729:106: error: cannot convert unsigned char* to const secp256k1_context_t* {aka const secp256k1_context_struct*} for argument 1 to int secp256k1_ec_pubkey_tweak_add(const secp256k1_context_t*, unsigned char*, int, const unsigned char*)
bool ret = secp256k1_ec_pubkey_tweak_add((unsigned char*)pubkeyChild.begin(), pubkeyChild.size(), out);
^
make: *** [obj/key.o] Error 1
bool ret = secp256k1_ec_pubkey_tweak_add((unsigned char*)pubkeyChild.begin(), pubkeyChild.size(), out);
^
make: *** [obj/key.o] Error 1
I'm assuming because as was mentioned, crave daemon does not currently support latest secp256k1 ?
Had to do this to get it to actually reset/rollback and successfully compile:
Code:
git clone https://github.com/bitcoin/secp256k1
cd secp256k1
git reset a0d3b8
git add .
git reset --hard
./autogen.sh
./configure
make
sudo make install
cd ..
sudo ldconfig
cd crave/src
make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=
strip craved
cd secp256k1
git reset a0d3b8
git add .
git reset --hard
./autogen.sh
./configure
make
sudo make install
cd ..
sudo ldconfig
cd crave/src
make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=
strip craved
Thanks rocoro. I used the following to build the QT version. It worked like a charm.
Code:
git clone https://github.com/bitcoin/secp256k1
cd secp256k1
git reset a0d3b8
git add .
git reset --hard
./autogen.sh
./configure
make
sudo make install
cd ..
sudo ldconfig
cd crave
qmake && make USE_UPNP=
cd secp256k1
git reset a0d3b8
git add .
git reset --hard
./autogen.sh
./configure
make
sudo make install
cd ..
sudo ldconfig
cd crave
qmake && make USE_UPNP=
If you want to use more cpu cores change the last line to:
qmake && make -jX USE_UPNP=
where X is the # of cores to use, so -j4 would use 4 cores.
Re: [ANN] CRAVE 0.52M, Dark Assets = Embrace The Dark = MASTERNODE HARDFORK APR 8
Fools stop dumping, look how much is only left for sale!
Check beta rex, its back
1M buys? Check beta rex, its back
Crave have only 500k coins
From where does this order book come ?
I think it is:
https://beta.bittrex.com/
Re: [ANN] CRAVE 0.52M, Dark Assets = Embrace The Dark = MASTERNODE HARDFORK APR 8
Nooooooooo... I missed it!!
Same here...can't get my BTC to Bittrex fast enough :-)
Re: [ANN] CRAVE 0.52M, Dark Assets = Embrace The Dark = MASTERNODE HARDFORK APR 8
./craved masternode start
successfully started masternode
Waiting for first masternode payment :-)
successfully started masternode
Waiting for first masternode payment :-)
Four nodes thus far...
{
"104.238.133.102:9999" : 1,
"45.55.140.160:9999" : 1,
"178.62.199.175:9999" : 1,
"185.92.222.48:9999" : 1
}
Re: [ANN] CRAVE 0.52M, Dark Assets = Embrace The Dark = MASTERNODE HARDFORK APR 8
Can someone tell me how I can "lock" the 500 coins in my masternode and only spent the "earned" coins @ linux ?
I use coin control to make sure that I don't spend the required masternode base amount.
Settings -> Options -> Display
Example from YAC but still located under the same tab in CRAVE...
Re: [ANN] CRAVE HiPOS 40MB 0.52M = Embrace The Dark = MASTERNODE HARDFORK APR 8
Code:
crypto/hmac_sha256.cpp:34:1: fatal error: opening dependency file obj/crypto/hmac_sha256.d: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/crypto/hmac_sha256.o] Error 1
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/crypto/hmac_sha256.o] Error 1
What did I do wrong? I am on latest Debian.
Thank you, mate. Works now!
Same error on Ubuntu 14.04...same fix. Compiles fine now
2.8mh/s with 7950 @1075/625 - not bad 
Has the GPU miner been released?
just take a loot at miners list of https://www.suprnova.cc/ - 101,362kh/s with the help of CPU - don`t think so...
or may be we have only 101.362/530= 191*Intel i5-4770 (with active-HT)?
Oh, OK. I wouldn't say that is the dark side though.
Wolf0 is a superb GPU coder. IMO he deserves the spoils of his work. Additionally, I think you'll find that his code has benefited most every GPU miner here. Shout out to smolen and reorder as well. If not for these guys our GPUs might be quite useless for coin mining by now.
I was just curious as I am learning C++ and CUDA. I've got my code talking stratum and hashing but not working correctly. Not sure how long it will take me, if ever. My code fu is weak. I'm a "duct tape coder", splicing pieces from other CPU and GPU miners. I like to compare my code to the aforementioned coders to learn.
2.8mh/s with 7950 @1075/625 - not bad
Has the GPU miner been released?