Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
avabit
on 25/01/2014, 22:36:30 UTC
I actually prefer that friedcat doesn't post until he's sure about what he's going to say and that it's the right time to say it. Unlike butterfly labs, where "two weeks" became a running gag.
If AM produces the most energy efficient chips (@0.2 watts/ghs) and outhashes everybody, how many Btcs will AM be able to theoretically mine in say one year? Give me a min and a max.
(Until the next reward halving) 25 BTC per block 144 blocks per day 52560 blocks per year 1314000 BTC per year
If AM maintains an average of 10% of the hashrate: 131400 BTC mined by AM 0.3285 BTC per share
I'd say min would be 2.5%, max would be 25% so between 0.082125 BTC and 0.82125 BTC per share
And this doesn't count in hardware sales or anything like that
1. Dividends are going lower because of Difficulty increase (-> Cointerra launch soon etc.) 2. No new statement from Friedcat 3. BTC price goes up 4. AM Share price goes up too ? (0.28 to 0.38@ Havelock] wtf?
either somebody knows for sure the tapeout is on schedule or somebody is gonna lose a lot of money
Re: ## 1320 ASICMINER DIRECT SHARES @0.29[btc] - 7 DAYS AUCTION - ESCROW POSSIBLE ##
by
avabit
on 24/11/2013, 23:16:38 UTC
50 @ 0.29
Post
Topic
BoardHardware
Re: YES, you can get a REFUND from BFL
by
avabit
on 04/08/2013, 15:45:50 UTC
Try just contacting them through the webform, if enough people complain, paypal will take notice
Post
Topic
BoardSecurities
Re: [BTCTC][[ASICMINER-PT]] - Public trading of ASICMINER shares
by
avabit
on 06/06/2013, 06:46:41 UTC
err.. status "FAILED" ?
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin now accepted by the HumbleBundle!
by
avabit
on 29/05/2013, 18:45:43 UTC
I didn't need to wait for any confirmations. I just sent the funds and clicked "confirm" and it sent me the keys.
Post
Topic
BoardSecurities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
avabit
on 29/05/2013, 18:42:01 UTC
A similar situation occurred on btcguild where some pplns shifts were paid double. The way it was handled was to deduct the additional funds from the account.
From the site:
Quote
Additionally, there was a bug last night where some PPLNS shifts were paid double. This has been retroactively corrected. Accounts which received payouts during this time may currently be showing a negative account balance.
I think the bug that happened with btct could be handled roughly the same way.
Post
Topic
BoardSecurities
Re: [BTC-TC] TAT.ASICMINER New Micro-share Passthrough!
by
avabit
on 29/05/2013, 17:51:15 UTC
Would it be acceptable to give people a negative balance if they didn't have enough funds to return?
I just noticed that one of the outputs was 0.000001 BTC
Will this mean it will be never included in a block due to the new 54 uBTC limit?
edit: nevermind!
Post
Topic
BoardElectrum
Re: connecting problems
by
avabit
on 24/04/2013, 20:49:38 UTC
Hmm actually it's working for me now :0
Post
Topic
BoardElectrum
Re: connecting problems
by
avabit
on 24/04/2013, 20:10:32 UTC
I also seem to be having issues connecting.
Post
Topic
BoardBeginners & Help
Re: where will TX fees go once difficulty reaches 0?
by
avabit
on 24/04/2013, 20:08:03 UTC
The transaction fees wouldn't necessarily be higher, but likely more valuable as bitcoins become more adopted. The difficulty changes based on the hash rate of the network and adjusts to ensure that a block is mined roughly every 10 minutes.
Post
Topic
BoardBeginners & Help
Re: Here here! Another noob!
by
avabit
on 24/04/2013, 20:02:56 UTC
derp
Post
Topic
BoardBeginners & Help
Re: Introduce yourself :)
by
avabit
on 24/04/2013, 20:00:11 UTC
mega lurker...member for nearly 2 years and still classified as a newbie bahaha