This looks promising at a glance. I will be following this closely this project

I don't know why etherdelta is always facing the same problems, even after their ICO they are not improving the standards. In order to get reputable one should always focus on development so that user base will start increasing.

News has surfaced of a new NEO-based ICO called Aphelion which aims to build the first trading platform for the NEO blockchain.

Welcome to crypto!

No one has ever made a dime in crypto by collecting "dividends"...
One way or another, ALL money in made by trading coin pumps and selling near tops.

Good luck in all your future endeavors!

As anyone who has been in software knows, it takes time. If the product is not forthcoming exactly to plan, people degrade, question, and try to instill fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) into others. Remember, in crypto you are discredited until proven otherwise. You don’t see knowledgeable people asking about Google’s AI program delays or complaining that Uber/GM/Tesla have failed since self driving cars are not blanketing the roadways. What you do find are those knowing very little about something yelling the loudest about any altered ‘planned trajectory’. OK — who’re we kidding — software is almost always delayed.

Even to this day, Apple, almost universally recognized as a top tech company, still has delays. Most notably their shipment of the iPhone X and HomePod.

hey!, where bagging populous here. Ill go bag hive in their own forum.

So.... ive had a look and as expected it was the late then uncompleted beta which has killed this coin.

NOT FUDSTERS.

Just letting the kids at home know, a beta release should be fully working and operational with just bugs to iron out. OPerational meaning can accept invoices, can credit risk score, can be factored.

I feel that if they don't release final proper beta this month this coin is done for , maybe people hold on a bit longer mid marchish maybe not.

you guys only have a few days to make this happen. This coin will get dumped to nothing.

Further to this and i got to admit i dont fully understand it, but have read the white paper. I understand you put in your ppt which is exchaged for pokens to the invoice buyer. Then I believe the invoice buyer can exchange pokens to fiat.

What happens if i as PPT holder Factor to myself. So I can hold the fiat. If the price of PPT goes up I can exchange the fiat back to myself with profits and cop the fee from populous. HOWEVER, if the price of PPT goes down . I can not exchange the tokens take the money and purchase more PPT at a cheaper price and populous are on hook for the contract which i just delfault on. As the invoice buyer obviously your not going to kick up a fuss as you gained yourself. This is all given that no invoices are checked at populous. This is too simple and im sure they have a solution but I didn't read about it in the whitepaper thats all.

Proof that HIVE stole Populous' white paper.  Like literal copy/paste type of shit.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocPcCOmuZr8

Its funny to read this last 10 pages.

I just got confirmation that i made correct decision investing in Hive rather than PPT.

They are already 2 steps in front of PPT.

Real partnership, demo version, big exchange coming until end of Q1, great team,
great comunity manager,..

New AMA & Q&A from Reggie. Excellent news!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fr4ajiOa6k

This just reminds me about BitConnect case. Many were yelling that it was scam and many other were defending. At the end...

You know how it ends.

My point is simple: Why give a leeway for anyone to cause any legal hassle/trouble by not registering your own trademark? Why avoid taking the advantages that naturally come with registering your trademark as soon as possible? If not registering a trademark is equally the same as registering it, then what advantages are you talking about?

You are actually coming into defense of an act of incompetency. I bet if another company that you have no financial conflict of interest in that does not register its trademark, you would criticize it. But with Veritaseum, you continue to give positive judgment despite some incompetency. Not saying that incompetency is a big thing, but you certainly are showing very strong bias. But right, you should be fully aware of your biasness, because I am really honestly and sincerely getting really sick of it. You are not showing any sign of good reason and logic in your judgment. To me, you are someone that would say everything good about something that you have interest in. If you were to have a son (your own biological son) you would always say he is a good person, a right person, a noble person, etc etc goodness, even if this son of yours have committed wrongdoings or misconducts. You would find whatever justifications to justify your son's misconducts as good conducts. Here is where I am different from you. I have substantial ownership in VERI, but I still criticize it when I think it is wrong. I am not afraid if I suffer some short-term market loss as a result. That, I believe is a level of objectivity that a great majority of people (including you) do not have.

Your extreme subjectivity is very clear to me, and keep disagreeing with almost everything I say, even those things I sincerely and honestly believe is very objective and obvious to any impartial + reasonable 3rd person. I would say a white paper is white and whiter than a black paper. You, on the other hand, having a financial conflict of interest in that black paper business, would argue why a white paper can actually be blacker than a black paper. If you think I am being rude and rough on you, that is because you 100% deserve it.

I bet I am not making any sense to many people here. I bet if I say the sky is blue, you would say that doesn't make sense. If I say water is vital to health, you would say that doesn't make sense. If someone else (not me) were to say the exact same things, you would say that makes a lot of sense. Ultimately it is not what I say. It is what your prejudice is.

Update:
Are you a paid shill?
You don't even know what you are talking about, and yet you have the audacity to say I am doubling down on not knowing what I'm talking about.
You are not making any sense at all.
You, on the other hand, are doubling/tripling down on what you don't know about, and I will continue to make you lose.