Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 22 results by bananax
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 29/08/2017, 15:22:01 UTC
If they come back i withdrawal my %55 funds immediately. Then give the %55 to Mafia for cutting their throats because of scamming my 45% funds. Believe me folks. This is exit scam. Don't let they fool us. Find those M*Fs and give them to Mafia. FBI and US goverment hasn't any relation to this. They made this story for scamming us.
This is my message: You can't escape forever. Mafia is behind you

How exactly did they fabricate that the US government seized their domain and nailed them with a $110M fine?
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 29/08/2017, 14:58:54 UTC
Let me get this straight... does btc-e plan to REDEEM individual coin tokens for actual real coins at some time in the future?

the new exchange will redeem each token for a value of 1USD in the future (When they have more funds I'm guessing), and not sure which coin / currency they will exchange it to.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 15/08/2017, 14:18:41 UTC
Quote from: btc-e.com
The FBI arrives to seize the server and everything for a new and so 1000 times.
Even if the server is hosted in the DNS and the domain can not be avoided in the torus, the question is whether you wait for 1.5 months each time until the service is restored?

Btce answering to "verification" question.

DNS = Donetsk Republic (in the Ukraine)
torus = TOR

Are they answering "Why" they need verification? to avoid being brought down again?
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 11/08/2017, 15:16:51 UTC

"BTC-e attempted to conceal that it provided services to customers located within the United States."

I wonder where the rationale behind this statement comes from.
It seems odd that they would attempt to conceal something unconcealable - I wasnt aware that it was even supposed to be secret

Maybe lawyer speak for "did not require the users location to be given" or "did not provide information on users when requested"
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 11/08/2017, 05:12:09 UTC
I verified my btc-e account via xbtce a month ago. So they already have my ID documents. For me, it doesn't hurt anymore to re-verify with them again.

There might be a difference now that charges were unsealed against them. It's unlikely (certainly for small fish), but given that the indictment alleges that the exchange itself is a criminal money laundering operation, the federal authorities can argue that the money you are withdrawing constitutes criminal proceeds. I'm sure they could seize it with civil forfeiture, if they can ever get their hands on it. I doubt they'd charge regular customers with conspiracy to launder money, but I also wouldn't want to be caught with the proceeds and my passport linked to the transactions via the exchange's database.

That's the thing here.... it's one thing to relaunch an altcoin exchange safely outside of the US sphere of influence. But that doesn't require documents. There is some speculation on the Russian forum about what exactly "verification" means. Some think it means tiered verification like other altcoin exchanges (e.g. name, address, phone number to enable withdrawals or something).

Huh? The charge BTCE had was operating a money service without a license.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 10/08/2017, 06:44:17 UTC
What investment company will want to associate their name to BTC-E right now? There is no investor! The new company will be registered on some homeless guy name and total assets will be 100$.

If they are innocent and they will fight in court of law for justice why do they drop BTC-E brand for another one?

They need us to wash their dirty money and we will not only help them wash their money but we will also pay 45% of our money for this.

Anonymous fugitive owners, accused of money laundering and identity theft asking for people personal documents seems legit.

Where does this "identity theft" gossip come from?
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 10/08/2017, 01:34:10 UTC
Please guys, do not forget that 14.5% of all balances are not mentioned in the last update.
This means that BTCe will hold for itself 14.5% of all the coins and fiat funds.
That's no small fee.

This all seems very shady.
Obviously something is better than nothing... but I have the feeling that BTCe owners will earn a LOT from this situation.
Keeping 14.5% of all the money, making the BTE conversion at the most profitable (for them) rates... selling coins in this times of high prices...
And finally, keeping the unclaimed assets that illicit users will not recover due to the verification processes.





Don't forget that that includes BTCe assetts as well. So that 14.5% might be 25% of what they had before. Or also to use for lawyers to take on the US DoJ to retrieve the rest of their assetts
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 09/08/2017, 17:50:16 UTC
No fiat processor will work with them, they will not work under BTC-E brand meaning they do not intend to pay the 110 mil fine, their company is registered on a 20 yo person with a capital of 100 pounds.

Why do they need our documents? To open bank accounts on our names or another fictive companies for their scams?

The solution for you is simple, don't participate and you don't have to worry.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 31/07/2017, 17:48:35 UTC

They should refunding according to pro level trollbox comment history. Pretty much the only real way to ensure justice


Every once in a while I would see a useful piece of news or advice out of that trollbox.

As annoying as it was, I do miss it.  Wink

honestly, the trollbox was a deluxe constitution of the weirdest & bonkest ppl i've every saw Oo"

MOOOON FTW !!!

Mewn??
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 28/07/2017, 22:11:17 UTC
It's just a domain name, calm down people :X
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 28/07/2017, 21:46:53 UTC
Trolls are everywhere

Why do you keep saying this?  Do you have the correct info to ease the trolls?

It's called denial, people will try to convince themselves that nothing is wrong regardless of the facts put in front of them.

Sorry for your loss potent, but spreading false hope at this point isn't helping anyone.

https://www.tcpiputils.com/browse/ip-address/74.208.15.160

A bunch of seized domains
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 28/07/2017, 21:11:17 UTC
root# ping btc-e.com
PING btc-e.com (74.208.15.160): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 74.208.15.160: seq=0 ttl=55 time=175.390 ms
64 bytes from 74.208.15.160: seq=1 ttl=55 time=172.723 ms
64 bytes from 74.208.15.160: seq=2 ttl=55 time=170.876 ms

74.208.15.160/index.html - check this

Nice try?

92%%%ping btc-e.com
PING btc-e.com (104.23.132.83) 56(84) bytes of data.


Ever heard of DNS propagation?

Is that the same as a fabricated coffin?

You can check dns propagation (ip changes) at https://www.whatsmydns.net/#A/btc-e.com


All right then, I fully retract my previous responses Smiley

Guess we'll have to wait.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 28/07/2017, 20:52:08 UTC
root# ping btc-e.com
PING btc-e.com (74.208.15.160): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 74.208.15.160: seq=0 ttl=55 time=175.390 ms
64 bytes from 74.208.15.160: seq=1 ttl=55 time=172.723 ms
64 bytes from 74.208.15.160: seq=2 ttl=55 time=170.876 ms

74.208.15.160/index.html - check this

Nice try?

92%%%ping btc-e.com
PING btc-e.com (104.23.132.83) 56(84) bytes of data.




Ever heard of DNS propagation?

Yup, however, if this person is suggestion it's been seized, the seizure probably would have taken place more than 48 hours ago, and the propagation would be close to if not completed already.

Or it could be that he is trying to panic people by spreading misinformation.

How about this, tell me the DNS server he used, and I can check directly against it Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 28/07/2017, 20:41:24 UTC
root# ping btc-e.com
PING btc-e.com (74.208.15.160): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 74.208.15.160: seq=0 ttl=55 time=175.390 ms
64 bytes from 74.208.15.160: seq=1 ttl=55 time=172.723 ms
64 bytes from 74.208.15.160: seq=2 ttl=55 time=170.876 ms

74.208.15.160/index.html - check this

Nice try?

92%%%ping btc-e.com
PING btc-e.com (104.23.132.83) 56(84) bytes of data.


Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e.com
by
bananax
on 28/07/2017, 14:50:25 UTC
Dear everyone,

im holding atleast 500,000$ in my btc-e wallet what looks like gone for now.
im holding like 1700 ETH, 35k coins of NVC and 100k coins of NMC.

I heard good and bad news from the Russian side, but i dont know what to believe.
If there another peoples who control the BTC-e website the best for him is to go live back instead of stealing our money what will bring them to a criminal case.

I've also made a verification to BTC-E into XBTCE but they dont take any responsibility for now.

Anyone here also have more then 100K$ into the exchange please inform me so we can act together in any cases.

I hope to get a good news soon. Sad

Ignore the doom-mongering ghouls. BTC-e will be back up and fully functional within the week

BTC-e at worst has a fine to pay that it can easily do so. The site is a fucking money printing machine, those guys are working flat out to get it back online

I hope you are right but why are they down if its just a fine to pay is what i wonder? The other problem is they were a money printing machine, now can people use them ? At least we know more who they are now ha.

we do?
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 27/07/2017, 15:28:01 UTC
I see so much wishful thinking from users who have coins and money stuck on btc-e, it's almost sad...

"It's going to be ok, I bet the website will be back up and running in a few days."
"The admin are working on it."
And so on...

I'll give you my two cents: If BTC-e ever comes back up, it will be in a few months at least. That is because whoever is in charge now will have to cooperate with law enforcement to figure things out. And law enforcement is hella slow. They will audit BTC-e and if by chance they don't simply decide to confiscate all the bitcoins, then they will have to figure out which accounts are legitimate and which are not. Which means that to get your coins back you'll have to give them your identify and prove where your money or coins came from and that it was all legit.

I have 2 grands worth of altcoins on the exchange, I consider that money as lost, and I don't care, because I knew, and everybody with a brain knew, that BTC-e was shady as fuck, and you'd have to be really stupid to have kept more than you were willing to lose there.

I will also give my two cents to the other wishful thinkers that believe their coins are safe on another exchange because "it's regulated". All exchanges, without exception, are being used by criminals to launder money. Only the extent of it varies, and whether or not the owners are involved in it. Have y'all forgotten about BitInstant already??

BTC-e is DONE. DEAL WITH IT  Cool

What law enforcement is that Smiley?  IF they want to solve their US problem wouldn't be as simple as not allowing FIAT withdraw to US Banks?
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 27/07/2017, 02:12:53 UTC
And how is the US supposed to take action against btc-e ? Apart from blocking banks from working with btc-e, I don't think there is much they can do.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: Speculation: The gentlemen arrested for 4b money laundering scheme was BTC-e
by
bananax
on 26/07/2017, 21:40:00 UTC
Alexander also runs bitmixer, so it makes sense for that to go down.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bananax
on 26/07/2017, 21:09:15 UTC
My theory is that they are relocating after all of this mess.

I'm not optimistic, I consider my funds lost at this point, but there is always hope Smiley

going by rough numbers, btc-e made .4% per trade,(.2% buy .2% sell), the volume of coins that were exchanged there is huge, they are walking away with $4,000 per $1,000,000 traded in fees.  
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: BananaX reputation thread
by
bananax
on 12/04/2014, 12:57:38 UTC
I'm currently renting one of your rigs and its been offline for a bit. I have sent you a PM and haven't gotten a response as of yet.

Lmk.


- Well, the miner has been down most of the lease time at this point. Still no response to PM's. We shall see..

Hey, I tried to add 3.5 hours (3 for the down time, and 30 minutes for the inconvenience) but Leaserigs only allows 30% of rental time, which in your case is 2 hours, if you re-rent I can add another 1.5 hours or give you 1/6th of your rental payment back, let me know which you'd prefer.