Search content
Sort by
Showing 8 of 8 results by bbosch
Re: ⚛️ [ANN] Bitcoin Atom - Fork 1:1 of Bitcoin - Atomic Swap Powered ⚛️
Does anybody know why the BTC is decreasing his value?
FUD. Deliberate manipulation by the banksters. It was over priced and it's just returning it where it should be in growth terms.
Completely right. Someone is going to double his crypto stakes during this recession. Chinese ban is just natural development, nothing else could have been expected. The thing with credit cards seems like a temporary fuss created to manipulate the market and make huge profits. It shows that even decentralized currencies are not really decentralized until news like this can affect the prices so tremendously.
Of course it will. These manipulations will only shake the weak hands out. Just be patient. If you don't have to sell then just hodl. Even if you are losing money right now, be patient.
@BCA Team: Can you please just all sit together and do a retro and come up with a date? Does not matter if that is one year down the line but at least we will have a date and will STOP expecting anything from this team till that date. You guys are delaying it from day 1 by saying few days.. few days but not giving any concrete date. Don't think, any professional group of people would work like this and more so when you have already forked the blockchain.
Indian team? Expected in a few days, soon, very soon.......deliver something (but not working)
ETH will drop below 7 USD in next days.
below 6 USD in the next days?Burst - useless, imho. It waste disk space on trash files, but storj waste disk space on files of users. It good project with real profit for society. But no transparency. If burst so profitability - it overpriced
Agreed, the disk space used for BURST is not usefull. Storing thousands of cat pictures is more usefull, but a real profit for society? (they are still testing, i have my doubts if your storage is used by someone). Just look at the BURST wallet, the tools, the pay-outs and compare this to STORJ. If you start BURST today with 10TB space you will get payments tomorrow. With STORJ it takes forever to use even 1 TB, payment will be mid january and not clear if you get 100, 5000 or 12 SJCX. Hello, I started in 30 Nov 16 and share 200GB. Used all 200 gb. But I not have SJCX in my wallet. I will get in December payout? I must write in community? I need 1000/10000 sjcx on my wallet for getting profit?
How much profit for 1 TB (used) if bandwith 40 mbit/s, access 23/7 and data downloaded and uploaded once?
My impression is that the storj guys have a fixed monthly amount of SJCX used for payments and based on the number of days and GB used you receive a piece of the pie. Basically they do not want to share the details of the calculation (although they claim STORJ is open source) and they only publish a file with the accounts and SJCX earned 2-3 weeks after month-end. I stopped sharing my disk space and moved to BURST (daily payments). I also tried SIA but payouts are not comparable to BURST.How much profit for 1 TB (used) if bandwith 40 mbit/s, access 23/7 and data downloaded and uploaded once?
Just got my reward for the first two weeks for sharing my 3TB on DriveShare - 0.2293 SJCX , that's about 4600satoshis 
I'm comparing this to Burst and I think it's much more profitable if you use your storage to mine Burst,that 1 tb will give much more rewards in 24 hours,and beside Burst has a good community support and potential.
I agree, BURST is more profitable. For october I received 25 SJCX for sharing 100 GB during 2 weeks. The software has memory leaks ( in Beta testing!). I thnk they are at least 6 months away from anything stable and completely functional.
With Storj the pay-out is unclear, slow and manual. STORJ is working on micropayments but again unclear when this will be implemented.
Re: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs
Where you can see such things?
just check the number of records in the richlist http://nemnodes.org/richlist/transactions you can check at http://chain.nem.ninja/#/transfers/0
everybody harvesting knows that most blocks have no transactions....and I do not see a lot of change there,
I guess it is fair to say that the marketcap of NEM can only increase if the network grows faster (=more wallets, more transactionsday)
Re: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs
NEM working ninja style! 
Looking forward to the day this sleeping giant awakes, but like in a lot of projects, patience is key. Apple market cap once was maybe in the thousands, I think NEM is in the same phase as Apple was in the early days.
Maybe...but currently I don't see any real growth in the number of wallets ( only a handfull a day) nor an increase in the number of transaction (most of the transactions are supernode rewards). Looking forward to the day this sleeping giant awakes, but like in a lot of projects, patience is key. Apple market cap once was maybe in the thousands, I think NEM is in the same phase as Apple was in the early days.