Actually, Bytecoin (BCN) currently tops Monero; and in terms of total market cap, Bytecoin has hit $8 million versus Monero's $5.5 million. I'm not sure what might happen in the long run, but it would appear that people are more concerned about originality versus a masked premine.

So you believe people are actually going to be psyched about a clone coin in the long run?   Didn't everyone learn their lesson from Bytecoin (BTE)? I guess we should be thankful that they're being honest about it being a clone coin. The only people mining it momentarily are early-bird miners.

Maybe it's because they're willing to sacrifice their public reputation to get a few million out of the cryptoworld. To them, what it comes down to is, "what's the better option?" Working for another 5-20 years doing whatever it is they were previously doing; or create a scam coin with the knowledge that they have, and skim the top every time the market rises past a certain point? Unsurprisingly, their profiles and pictures have been removed from the Neutrino website.

That's why they're smiling in the pictures posted on their website.

I don't see what the point of a GPU miner for BBR is. Wasn't BBR trying to differentiate itself from the rest of the Bytecoin clones by making itself heavily GPU resistant? Unless of course there already is a private GPU miner for BBR, and now it's just a matter of supplying a fair game.

I'm using the latest BBR simpleminer (bbr-win64-v0.2.0.20-f9bfe73); I'm also getting the same error with the Cryptonote miner. Aside from solo-farm mining, is anyone still solo mining Boolberry? I don't see how the sole public BBR pool only has about .25% of the total network hashrate. Is the majority of the Boolberry hashrate being driven by the rumored private GPU miner?

http://i61.tinypic.com/k3umuc.png
[/quote]

I'm currently still mining on port 7777 with no issues.
[/quote]

Weird. I'm using two different computers, with two different firewalls, on an internet connection with a 10ms ping time. Sometimes it's all green, then for a few minutes at a time, I get a ton of shares that fail to submit (and a few failed shares in-between from time to time). Not sure what the problem is.

Given ExtremePool is the only working pool for Boolberry, I'm assuming others are also experiencing errors with simpleminer submitting shares. Is this a pool issue or a miner issue? I get the errors on port 5555 and 7777 all the same.

http://i61.tinypic.com/k3umuc.png

QCN is cheaper, a bit more fair to long-term miners, and rarer than all the other coins, but that will only matter should a "whale" or two be looking to make a long-term investment. However, should Poloniex decide to take QCN out of the exchange (which is looking like a possibility at this point), that will be the final nail in the coffin for QCN.

OracionSeis, should you want your coin to stand out from the other Bytecoin clones, then make it truly different (not just an altered emission curve). Feature which could make QCN stand out from the rest? POS.

Actually, that was Quazarcoin, Boolbeery, Mountcoin and last, but probably not ultimately last, duckNote. This is an instamine, pump and dump coin -- and I sure will be dumping the day it hits Poloniex.

I'm not trying to thread cap, just stating the obvious. Any investor wanting to trade in BTC for DRK to act as a masternode is placing $6,000+ at risk -- you really do have to assure people their wallets are secure, given reasonable protection.

Intended for the Darkcoin devs:

If people didn't have to risk 1000 Darkcoins, maybe people wouldn't be dumping it like crazy whenever the ROI is 3+ times what someone paid for them originally, when someone happens to get there Darkcoins stolen, or a hardfork goes wrong -- or worst case scenario, all three happen around the same time. Maybe, just maybe, you could allow people to act as masternodes with 100 Darkcoins.

Intended for Darkcoin investors:

I'm sure the Darkcoin devs would like you to think that the person that had his Darkcoins stolen was purely a user error (either it being a downed firewall and/or a poor wallet password), but the truth is, no one knows (though we will if people keep getting their masternode wallets stolen). Until Darkcoin has the proven reputation that Bitcoin has had with its security (which has proven to be flawed), I'm not sure why anyone would be willing to let $5,000+ dollars sit in the open waiting for some desperate hacker to find a flaw.

Need escrow service. PM sent.

Anyone still trading QCN here, PM me.

Because Darkcoin is currently under threat by Monero and Quazar coin. Once these coins get their proper wallet, things should take off for them as well.

Darksend is older technology. I'm not sure the idea of ring signatures was even around when Darksend was thought up. Also, one of the reasons Darkcoin is growing so rapidly is because people want to be Masternodes, further funding Darkcoin in the process. Had people realized this earlier, I doubt Darkcoin would have the success it's having now. To back Darkcoin up, there is a concern that ring signatures might be exploitable in the future.



Which is why there is a growing popularity for Monero and Quazar coin. If anonymity is the objective, there are three services available now.

Nevermind. It took over an hour, but it is showing up on the blockchain now.

So I sent a payment to my Mintpal address using the old wallet (v. 0.9.1.2), and the payment isn't showing up on Mintpal or on the blockchain. It's been over an hour, so I just want to know if there is some sort of bug in the old wallet. The transaction id is 5d44dbf3e5953c02e844f09399e3b277113919f7496fff60427456b01394988f. Anyone have an issue like this before?

Not entirely sure what that's suppose to mean. What I do know is that, this miner is dead. The latest XPM miner is shelling out 4.9 CPD on a 280x at 1100. . Even if this miner gets open sourced, nobody would use it. The fee-free version of the miner is shelling out 3.9 at 1100.

The pool and miner was just released to the public yesterday. Give it a few more days, and I'm sure it'll have the reliability of ypool. I like ypool; but it's a fact that they control over 51% of the hashing power for Primecoin, leaving it susceptible to a 51% attack on their part (however unlikely that they would want to in the first place). Just trying to spark some healthy competition.