Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 27 results by benm
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [HAVELOCK] Crypto Financial (CFIG) Official Thread
by
benm
on 09/03/2015, 18:04:39 UTC
Thank you, the withdrawal has been processed.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [HAVELOCK] Crypto Financial (CFIG) Official Thread
by
benm
on 09/03/2015, 17:31:47 UTC
Hello Havelock,

Are you currently processing withdrawals of bitcoin? I made a withdrawal about an hour ago. In the past, I got an instant confirmation that my withdrawal was processed. Now I have only received a notification that the withdrawal request was received - so far no withdrawal has actually taken place.

Has something changed? Please process withdrawals ASAP. I'm not even withdrawing a large amount (<0.4btc).
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 14/01/2015, 16:59:06 UTC
Wow.... like the flies! What's that buying pressure on Havelock? Do you think it's merely the chance of buying some cheap shares due to the decrease in BTC price? Or again inside knowledge from Board members or industry partners like we've seen with the announcement of the successful BE300s tests?

A board member wouldn't risk (or care, they have thousands of shares) buying a hundred or two of shares on Havelock based on inside knowledge. Maybe some guy at packaging, or assembly, or something.
But definitely, that buying before the BE300s tests must have been on inside knowledge.

Yeah that was very strange, I mean it happened literally 1 or 2 days before the announcement and the chips weren't supposed to arrive for another week or so, so it couldn't have been pure anticipation I guess.

There is a bot on Havelock that does some market-making, and it occasionally juggles its position from the buy side to the sell side and vice-versa. There is even speculation that it buys/sells into itself to manipulate prices.

You can see the market-making in action by placing a sell order lower than the current ask price, or a buy order higher than the current bid price - even by 1 satoshi. Within a minute, the order that you covered in the orderbook will be canceled and replaced with a new order that differs from yours by about 1 satoshi.

You can see that the market maker is also the whale that moves shares back and forth by looking at the timestamps on bids/asks in the orderbook. Do you think it's just a coincidence that the 250 share bid order and the bid order at the spread were both placed within the same minute?

If you watch the orderbook you can pick out other behaviors that point to a lot of the orders on both sides of the book being controlled by the same party. For example, the bot won't over-bid or under-ask itself, and it maintains open orders at several different bid/ask prices. You can put in a bid in the middle of the book and slowly increment it, then watch which orders keep following yours, then cancel yours and watch the follower drop back down to its initial bid, even though you may have outbid a couple other orders on the way - the bot doesn't care to bid over those orders, most likely because those bids are also orders belonging to the bot.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 15/12/2014, 21:49:04 UTC
I've done some analysis of the havelock order book, and that sell wall is the same bot that bounces a couple of hundred shares back and forth between bid and ask.

Anyone planning on buying/selling on Havelock should also know you can manipulate that bot pretty easily and close the spread down to 3-5% since it will over/under bid you so it can be the market maker. Buy side seems to update its order every minute, ask side reacts to changes in the order book pretty quickly.

For example, the current bid is 0.12, but you could probably sell into the bot at around 0.125 -.128.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 27/11/2014, 03:34:42 UTC
Just going to re-confirm that my divs haven't been received on my address. I wonder if its because I only have a single share--is the div big enough to be accepted by the network?
same, I only have ONE direct share. My other one is at havelock (divs received at havelock, not at my direct share)

So basically Havelock gets to keep your dividend, since their withdrawal fee is 10x the standard 0.0001 btc that is expected for a transaction now.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 17/11/2014, 17:35:21 UTC
No and maybe.

All theoretical profits of AMHash units sold at IPO are distributed as dividends. AM had better have received sales proceeds for the miners supporting the AMHash units sold at IPO.

As for the AMHash units that did not sell at IPO, there is no information as to the operational concept.

What you just said is completely wrong. AMHash is a 5 Ph/s mine created by AM using AM hardware. AMHash is simply a service of AM just like the Prisma is a product of AM. The profit from selling AMHash units are not distributed as dividends to AMHash holders at all. That profit goes to AM. What gets distributed as dividends to AMHash holders is the proceeds form mining, just like someone who bought a miner would get BTC from mining. As for the units that don't sell, they mine for AM, because it's an AM service.



I'll believe it when I see a published ASICMINER mining address, or an AMHash mining address, or any kind of proof of mining - assuming they are self mining.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 08/11/2014, 18:33:33 UTC
AM likely has far more than 4 PH/s hashing right now. They've been building their farm since mid July. That 5 Ph/s is just a small slice set aside for the specific purpose of selling mining contracts.

Do you think AM self mining is bigger or smaller than KnC farm?

Remember the good old days where you could just go to blockchain.info/pools and see the AM's share of the network? And from that, infer the actual hashing power? I wish ASICMINER had a bit more transparency, at least about what is actually going on, how much hashing power is deployed, etc.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 03/10/2014, 16:39:47 UTC
Has anyone transferred shares into or out of Havelock recently? I initiated a transfer on September 9, but I haven't received any receipt or confirmation of my request, and the shares have not yet arrived in my Havelock account.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 18/12/2013, 23:31:25 UTC
I wonder how FriedCat will now convert RMB/Yuan from sales in China back into bitcoin to pay shareholders now that it looks like it's not going to be possible to buy any more bitcoin in China?
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 04/12/2013, 18:31:44 UTC
Does anyone know if the aim of the company is still to maintain 10% of the hashpower of the network? And if it is, is there a plan to get there?

At 10% of the network hashrate, we'd be looking at mining income of 0.0063 btc/share until the reward halves in 2017.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [BTC-TC] Virtual Community Exchange w/ Options, DRIP, 2FA, API, CSV, etc.
by
benm
on 23/08/2013, 08:47:49 UTC
I started a transfer in just before it went down. Hopefully it picks it up when the site comes back online.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 22/07/2013, 23:42:47 UTC
is ASICMINER allowed to write a motion proposing a stock split? I believe a 10:1 stock split would greatly benefit the company.

Shares are trading at almost 5BTC right now, which is around 450~ USD per share. This is a great sum of money. The next best option are the TAT.ASICMINER shares which are 100:1 but incure a 5% fee.

A 10:1 split would mean shares would be at 0.47/share, which will be a much more acceptable entry point for many newcomers.

The trading of stocks after the initial distribution doesn't benefit the company at all, unless they plan to sell.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 19/07/2013, 16:34:12 UTC
I could see TAT selling shares OTC, then rebuying off the btctc passthrough and exporting them as direct shares, thus eventually draining the btctc passthrough of shares. Conspiracy?
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 24/06/2013, 17:47:43 UTC
I'm not sure how much this will help (if at all considering I don't really post too much), but I've added  a link to the USB sales thread in my Signiture - If other share holders do the same then it might be better than Friedcat spending potential dividend funds on advertising...

I like the idea, but I think FC should also spend money on advertising.  Here and on reddit and google and facebook and anywhere else that it might be cost effective. 

Can we get an AM ad on the jumbotron in Times Square?

Who needs paid advertisement on reddit when you make a new post every time the price moves?
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 22/06/2013, 04:05:21 UTC
anyone have that chart of estimated dividends based on hashrate?

Here are the charts I follow:

http://www.asicminercharts.com/live/

http://runeks.dk/bitcoin/

http://www.asicminercharts.com/

is it just me or does anyone else have a problem viewing those in chrome?

Chrome on OSX works fine.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 21/06/2013, 06:29:33 UTC
Screw the 6 confirmations...................

it's like a horse race, waiting for the coins to come through before everyone elses ;p

BTCTC only requires 3 confirmations  Grin

BTCTC got the higher prices  Grin

Looks like it doesn't matter for me - running into a coinbase bug that I've hit before... sent some bitcoin, it left my account but never hit the network. Sigh. I wish MtGox still had their Dwolla deposits up and running.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 21/06/2013, 06:07:02 UTC
Screw the 6 confirmations...................

it's like a horse race, waiting for the coins to come through before everyone elses ;p

BTCTC only requires 3 confirmations  Grin
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 21/06/2013, 05:34:21 UTC
Lucky me, didn't have btc on hand to buy shares (curse you coinbase!) but saw some options that would become profitable at 2.9 - poor guy Wink
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 20/06/2013, 03:38:54 UTC
I haven't looked into this too closely, but all/most of the recent blocks awarded to ASICMINER have a much lower transaction count than those awarded to other miners/pools. Is that a coincidence, is it a consequence of the hardware design, is it somehow indicative of the recent drop in hashrate?

Coincidence. I saw one earlier with 600+ transactions.

Regardless, there is no mechanism in BTC to selectively mine blocks. I.e., you can't mine a 100 transaction block more easily than you can mine a 1,000 transaction block with a given difficulty. This cannot be done by adjusting hashrate either. At a given difficulty, your probability for mining a block is fixed to a certain hashrate over a period of time. A lower hashrate will have a lower probability, and a higher hashrate will have a higher probability.

In short, hashrate and difficulty have nothing to do with the size of the block you mine.

Ian

Hashrate and difficulty are unrelated to number of transactions, but a poorly connected node may show low number of transactions - which may also be a problem when broadcasting blocks! I.e. if two miners find a block almost at the same time, the well-connected node wins the block because it is broadcast more widely.

Not saying that's the case, but a low transaction number could be a signal of a poorly connected node, which could be a disadvantage in a race.

So... the drop in effective hashrate could actually be the result of a DDOS on the ASICMINER node(s)?

It did conveniently stop after the dividend payout - it could be someone trying to manipulate the price, or one of the other pool operators.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
benm
on 20/06/2013, 02:26:29 UTC
I haven't looked into this too closely, but all/most of the recent blocks awarded to ASICMINER have a much lower transaction count than those awarded to other miners/pools. Is that a coincidence, is it a consequence of the hardware design, is it somehow indicative of the recent drop in hashrate?