Search content
Sort by

Showing 3 of 3 results by bitappend
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: BANK RUN! - P2P Fiat-Bitcoin Exchange
by
bitappend
on 13/02/2014, 15:40:37 UTC
I would without a doubt recommend a larder deposit then 10%.. heck that's less then arbitrage in some instances. dare i recommend 25%? sounds high. however in the matter of the time it takes for bank transfer happens a lot can happen in the markets. Alice would get screwed if bob has greater incentive to walk away from his deposit if he has a better trade opportunity.

in a different scenario
 there might be a chance bob could extort Alice in order for her to get her deposit back.  should he refuse  to confirm
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: BANK RUN! - P2P Fiat-Bitcoin Exchange
by
bitappend
on 13/02/2014, 14:06:45 UTC
Bob claims he never received fiat funds?
I'm not worried about the reverse case as there no question about bitcoins going through.
The graphic should show what happens if Bob does not receive the wire transfer and they agree to cancel the transaction. I guess in that case a "rollback transaction"  is necessary (input: deposit 1.2, output: Bob 1.1 , Alice 0.1) right?

I think the point there was Bob CLAIMS to have not received the funds, when in reality he has. He just wants to keep the fiat and btc

yes this is what i was getting at..
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: BANK RUN! - P2P Fiat-Bitcoin Exchange
by
bitappend
on 13/02/2014, 13:43:11 UTC
What happens to the flow of money under the following scenarios?


Bob claims he never received fiat funds?
I'm not worried about the reverse case as there no question about bitcoins going through.


alternative scenario.
Bob dies in a car crash on way to work before acknowledging receipt?