Search content
Sort by
Showing 10 of 10 results by bitexecute
Re: ✅ZeroClassic [ZERC] - Fast, anonymous and without dev fees - SOFT FORK ✅
I think that moving to POS would be good in terms of securing the blockchain. But that will come bit later over the time. Now we need to have mobile wallet prepared and create new GUI wallet. We are also looking to get new exchange with more trading volume.
i think zeroclassic should remain to the original vision of the creator, proof of work, i will be interested if all of the specification of zeroclassic remains original, please do not make changes, as i will lose interest
and any way i don't mind using the online web wallet for the time being as its secure and easy use
but i would greatly appreciate gui desktop wallet(s) electrum version also and some mining pools so that i can start mining, iam unable to mine with the current active mining pools, where only 3 miners are only mining (the port number is missing from the getting started page on the mining pool https://pool.zeroclassic.org/) i will gladly mine this coin as i love the original zeroclassic specification and that is what attracted me to this project, i think this coin will be successfull in the future. i will be keeping my eye on this one
Re: [BCN] Bytecoin. Secure, private, untraceable since 2012
have you ever heard about Tangram? one of the most expected anonymous privacy coins in 2021. Well, they've been in the crypto sphere since 2018, now they're on testnet 2 closed beta phase. The progress might be slow but they're staying for long and still rocking to reach mainnet phase. The team and developers aren't anonymous, the code is open source. Tangram is not a fork, it has been coded from the ground, aims to be the first fully private, fast, and feeless coin. Smart contracts and other additions will also come later.
No not heard of it
monero, is or was a fork of bytecoin which i don't like it's history, i like the dynamic blocksize and fees which makes a lot of sense and is a good feature, some developers aren't anonymous and the creator of the whitepaper is anonymous i think, can't seem to trust monero because of it's history linked with bytecoin, bytecoin was a good coin but later they failed and forked into monero. no decent decentralized wallets on mobile wallet, has third party service in wallet which i hate, i don't like the unlimited uncapped total supply which i don't understand, unless it has mathematical design then it's okay
Sometimes a fork means a better implementation. Monero vs Bytecoin is one example of that. Bytecoin had shady mining and some bugs that allowed as far as I know for some supply to be created out of thin air.A lot of coins forked off from Bitcoin yet failed aggressively, although Bitcoin didn't. Does it make these coins automatically good and all? No, it does not. Also, where do you see third parties in their wallet..? Are you talking about Cake Wallet's swapping service? Cake isn't the official Monero wallet.
Also, after ~18.1M coins are mined, there will be something called "tail emission" which will release only 0.6XMR per block.. since this amount will be fixed at 0.6XMR, with every block the inflation will decrease. It's not really unlimited. If you don't understand something, read about it and inform yourself. Trying to rant about a coin you have no idea about makes you seem like you have no idea what you're talking about..
yes bitcoin is a true genius idea but the next step is to annonymize the blockchain. Im waiting for satoshi to create a new anonymous blockchain from scratch if he or she is up for it
I guess you'll have to wait for a long, long time... IIRC, he dissapeared about 10 years ago and nobody has heared from him ever since... I doubt he'll see your message and think "hey, this guy is right... I'll just re-appear after 10 years to make a new currency".
As for your theory that changes or forks mean a failed coin: i can't say i agree... Changes are made to fix bugs, to add new features, to adapt to changing conditions, to increase troughput, to decrease load... Fixing something (even if it means forking) is not equal to failing. The reference clients contains tens of thousands of lines of code, it's allmost impossible to write such a piece of software without any bugs while anticipating everything that could happen in the future and already including those features in your software. Patches and changes are a natural part of a development cycle... I doubt you'll find a single piece of big, popular software that has been around for a long time but never received a patch.
My wife is driving a Toyota Yaris that i bought about ~8 ish years ago... If i compare my car to the new Yaris, i can see the new model has a lot of new features... Some of them are safety related, some comfort related, some environment related... This does not mean my old Yaris was a failure: at the time i bought said car, it was an "average" car with "average" state-of-the-art features. Just because somebody found new safety features, or people's taste changed so they had to adapt the looks of the car, or the environmental rules changed didn't make my old car "bad"....
okay i understand about forking a little bit now thanks, but how did they even get permission to upgrade the code, how do they have access to the code edit, did satoshi trust someone to look after bitcoin? Its a good thing that btc has a 1mb blocksize which keeps it original and the 21000000 cap
You have said it all what most crypto users are looking for is anonymous which any coin not offering this Is a red flag to users except few others, who will want to risk it.
Take Bitcoin for example it developer is unknown this is the first sign of a strong Anonymous coin no matter the amount forks and network fees/tax.
Take Bitcoin for example it developer is unknown this is the first sign of a strong Anonymous coin no matter the amount forks and network fees/tax.
yes bitcoin is a true genius idea but the next step is to annonymize the blockchain. Im waiting for satoshi to create a new anonymous blockchain from scratch if he or she is up for it
my somewhat favourite privacy coins are,
zcash, but the privacy is optional. and has founders tax, fees are low but it's been modified to 0.00001000zec which seems like weird to me. the creator of the whitepaper is not anonymous i think, the developers are not anonymous, good mobile wallet but could do alot better, i like the decentralized look, no third party service in wallet, i like the original 21000000 total capped supply
monero, is or was a fork of bytecoin which i don't like it's history, i like the dynamic blocksize and fees which makes a lot of sense and is a good feature, some developers aren't anonymous and the creator of the whitepaper is anonymous i think, can't seem to trust monero because of it's history linked with bytecoin, bytecoin was a good coin but later they failed and forked into monero. no decent decentralized wallets on mobile wallet, has third party service in wallet which i hate, i don't like the unlimited uncapped total supply which i don't understand, unless it has mathematical design then it's okay
grin, i like the design, but something bugs me about it, fees are high but it's fine, they did something totally opposite that i like which they reduced the blocksize, but i also prefer dynamic blocksize and fees, i won't be able to get offline payment as the wallet must remain online to receive transactions which i dislike, creator of the whitepaper is anonymous, not sure if the developers are anonymous though, mobile wallet is decent
i don't understand why coins need to fork all the time to upgrade the blockchain, it makes no sense to keep altering the failed code. if a coin is forked does that mean it's a failed project, i think they have failed because the original author did not agree for the fork to happen in her/his absence
i want anonymous satoshi nakamoto to create a new technology. a solid privacy coin, and an unaltered blockchain or no upgrades, i want to invest in something genuine
zcash, but the privacy is optional. and has founders tax, fees are low but it's been modified to 0.00001000zec which seems like weird to me. the creator of the whitepaper is not anonymous i think, the developers are not anonymous, good mobile wallet but could do alot better, i like the decentralized look, no third party service in wallet, i like the original 21000000 total capped supply
monero, is or was a fork of bytecoin which i don't like it's history, i like the dynamic blocksize and fees which makes a lot of sense and is a good feature, some developers aren't anonymous and the creator of the whitepaper is anonymous i think, can't seem to trust monero because of it's history linked with bytecoin, bytecoin was a good coin but later they failed and forked into monero. no decent decentralized wallets on mobile wallet, has third party service in wallet which i hate, i don't like the unlimited uncapped total supply which i don't understand, unless it has mathematical design then it's okay
grin, i like the design, but something bugs me about it, fees are high but it's fine, they did something totally opposite that i like which they reduced the blocksize, but i also prefer dynamic blocksize and fees, i won't be able to get offline payment as the wallet must remain online to receive transactions which i dislike, creator of the whitepaper is anonymous, not sure if the developers are anonymous though, mobile wallet is decent
i don't understand why coins need to fork all the time to upgrade the blockchain, it makes no sense to keep altering the failed code. if a coin is forked does that mean it's a failed project, i think they have failed because the original author did not agree for the fork to happen in her/his absence
i want anonymous satoshi nakamoto to create a new technology. a solid privacy coin, and an unaltered blockchain or no upgrades, i want to invest in something genuine