Just to let you guys know that on my end it appears to be solved.

Many thanks for this BitcoinWisdom.

At the very least! Only ascended ones have that kind of hack mana... and finding an ascended wizard bellow 75 is nearly impossible. I don't buy it.

Getting this too, haven't changed anything on my end.

^^

apparently it also affected btcchina data...

here's a small video of it (check from the begining to see the movement i'm doing, the actual bump occurs at 26s)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-G7TeFWv9k

Contrary to my earlier instinct, it appears to happen independently if you hold the movement or not. Keep in mind i am at all times doing a uniform movement from side to side with the mouse.

Edit: if you're unable to reproduce, it might just be the case this affecting my own config only, in which case:

But please, don't bother too much with this, i know you have higher priority stuff in the pipe.

Thanks again.

Great charts, has improved greatly since first used it. Kudos!

may i suggest one thing:

- currently the cross misbehaves a little. It behaves as expected as long as one keeps moving it, but if one holds its position somewhere on the chart for a few 1/10s of second, when resuming movement before it follows the actual mouse coordinates it stays freezed for another while. It appears to be waiting for data or something, it feels unresponsive. Wouldn't it be possible to untie the actual cross drawing from whatever is freezing it? (Maybe adding some feedback indication that underlying data is "dirty" while moving, or reducing polling frequency to reduce the effect)

In any case, functionality as priority, and that is surely delivered.

Many thanks!

Under Attack Again Under Attack Again (http://forum.feathercoin.com/index.php?topic=2847.0)

The type of attack is messing the stats. Don't trust them.

That's indeed what's implied but i think he was only betrayed by the choice of words

OnT: I think Primecoin is a step in the right direction, i am bugged by the general pointlessness and waistness of mining cryptos. I am patiently waiting for a coin which can be actually useful and sets the miners in a cooperative spending of resources, currently this cooperativeness can only be achieved by mining in pools, which Primecoin lacks. But what i would like to see is this cooperation structuraly implemented, otherwise the waist in resources is crasy.

Depends on the source you have.

looking at the first line:

Don't quote me but it appears to be:
separated by ";"

You could obtain data to play with here:
http://bitcoincharts.com/about/markets-api/

with the format (unixtime,price,amount)

you would need to, pseudocode:


if my initial assumption is correct you would need something along these lines, unless you are able to find historical data on a daily basis instead of trade by trade.

I don't think that is fair to say. The advice was indeed to use these numbers, but no one is forced to follow them blindly. Actually these numbers mean absolutely different things depending on the periods one chooses to trade in (ie. hourly/daily bars), something which Goomboo only shared his preference.


I am no expert in any of the fields but as far as i get them the times they cross each other should not be looked at as future predictors, but as synthethisers of the past. As i have observed them, even if they're, at a certain moment, very prone to cross this can change and the "very likely" crossing turns out to _not_ happen. Basically they smooth over the discreet highs/lows changes that happen over time. The higher ema value more significance is given to the precedent and less likely it is to be affected in a sudden market move (to which you may then become exposed).

This is not to say that there isn't any influence if everyone start using the same numbers under the same time periods. But one may achieve very surprising results with totaly different numbers too. Ultimately there is a pair of numbers _and_ period which will be more efficient than any other. My view is, Goomboo advice is generaly very solid not because it predicts what will happen but because it will safeguard from catastrophe.

+1

i am having this too (a report if it helps others):

Pool stats - at 1:21:49

Guiminer(cgminer+console)

I am seeing an small increment with 17-04 version too, about 3-5%.

I did notice that Ctrl-C is ignored when the connection to pool isn't succesfull, forcing me to close the cmd window directly.

Anyways great job with the CUDA implementation.

I haven't contacted them, but apparently they have a limit to query the Markets API "once every 15 minutes" (http://bitcoincharts.com/about/markets-api/)

this might be the reason, i am not sure, but i think i had not seen this limit before. Regardless of the time limit i was not able to retrieve the historical data in any case.

It got me... so all u newbs around remember to keep yourself logged in AND this tab open in the browser.

Guess there is only one way to know. Sorry for the spam.

Don't tell i still need 2h after the 5 posts requirement...

I think i am exceeding the 5 posts per 4 hours, suggested limit.

+1

Though i understand the need, the solution is extremely cumbersome.

Well... just sharing my thumbs up for cudaminer project (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.0). Great work bringing nvidia to relevant levels.