User not reply private msg, then continue on sale.

Boted, but slowly without any risk of ban guaranteed

All accounts are legit created 1 year ago. Verified, name changeable, team selectable, no ban of any type.

Price for package -  0.0035BTC

Amen, you are absolutely right.

I hope this works for others, the case is that after reading a lot about the dangerousness of this issue because many people do not trust payments by paypal in case the sender cancels them (I admit that I felt indignant, I would not that never), I have covered the other side.

Shortly after putting the post indicating that I wanted to buy with Paypal, I receive many private messages from users offering me the service.

WOW, how many users want to do business with me !! when one convinces you look at their profile and you see Trust: 0: -0 / +0. Nothing its red. This is my man, I'm ready.

But beginners do not look within the Trust> Untrusted feedback> Show ratings section.

When you look inside because the hours go by and you do not get there, a chill runs down your back, because you see that you have an endless list of scams.

If your friend has deceived you, you do not care if you write to Paypal, that you threaten, you have lost your money and unfortunately a little dignity.

In 5 days it has happened to me 2 times, they are not very high amounts approx. $ 150, but they are enough to make you consider everything.

That's why all the novices, who get upset when they tell us that it's not a good idea to do an exchange like that, please be very careful. Do not let yourself bewitch with private messages, and above all review the complete trust profile, even make a search of your user name in the forum and above all nothing happens by asking that all the initial negotiations are made in the same thread as You have opened and not by private message.

Unfortunately I am neither the first nor the last, but if this serves to avoid that 1 only be deceived I will be happy.

Thank you

Need another 110$ in PayPal.

Hello,
I really appreciate your comments, but here is how I tell you.

Anyway, I INSIST that this was not the issue. He was wondering about buying BTC with Paypal, ok?

When someone asks for a can of ketchup, he does not want to be given the sauce recipe. I appreciate it but it was not the question.

I said that it was already solved, there is no need to insist.
thx

Hello, I know how to buy BTC in Coinbase, that was not the question.

Also in your post you have several errors that although they have nothing to do with the operation, I would like you to know them:

YOU SAY:

1) Transfer PP balance to bank account (FREE) - Not mate, have fee

2) Transfer $ 100 from bank account to Coinbase (FREE) - Not mate, have fee

3) Buy BTC at market price on Coinbase (FREE) - Not mate, have fee

But I breathe that was not the issue, I've already thanked Vibez1Tv for the interest.

Hi mate,
It is already solved, it was for a co-worker and finally he has already made the change.

Thank you in all the ways

I am looking to buy with 100 $ of my balance in PayPal account the equivalent minus the proposed BTC fee

The shipment is made with Paypal balance not with credit card.

Balance to buy: $ 100
I am looking for: BTC
Fee: negotiable

Thank you

As I said in the post, it is only used to make the withdraws. Simply by taking advantage of the API.
But obviously we will change it.

Hello, as I explained is previous post, we are working on severe aesthetic change, operation, logic of the jackpot and especially in provably fair.

Currently and so it will be reflected in provably fair, once the game is started by clicking on the New Game button, each level will be drawn according to the following proportions:
Levels 1 to 5 = 50% (Random winner between 0-1)
Levels 6 and 7 = 33.33% (Random winner between 0, 1, 2)
Level 8 = 25% (Random winner between 0, 1, 2, 3)

The resulting raffle is stored next to the game's id, for example: (0,0,1,1,0,2,1,3)

Each time the user clicks on their option in each level, the system checks the objectivity and result of the game and returns instance as the winner of that level or loser.

As I say the system will stay the same but adapted to provably fair.

With respect to the Jackpot, the current possibilities are detailed on the web following the following scheme:
Jackpot level The chances of obtaining the jackpot vary depending on the amount of the bet, with the following scheme
Bets 1 to 10 BGBs. 5% to win the Jackpot.
Bets 25 to 250 BGBs. 10% to win the Jackpot.
Bets 500 to 5,000 BGBs. 15% to win the Jackpot.
Bets 10,000 to 50,000 BGBs. 25% to win the Jackpot.
Bet 100,000 BGBs. 50% to win the Jackpot.

It will also change in this new version, since we are going to give the same possibilities to all users, be they one-bit or 25,000 bits. how we are defining them is. Instead of a jackpot button you will have 2, choose one of the 2 and if you hit the jackpot it is yours. Of course, the jackpots will be more balanced and will be reasonably lower.

I insist that the provably fair system will be as detailed but with the same principle.

Please, I put a previous comment on the election of the ideal wallet to process withdraws, I would appreciate any advice.

Thank you

THX!
in reference to the withdraws issue.

What is the ideal platform to have the withdraws account located? Let me explain, I currently operate in this sense with several accounts in coinbase, but I would like to know which is the most versatile place to do this type of operations, with less charge of commissions, which can concentrate several transfers and very valuable that has API?

I would like to take advantage of all the changes that we are making to leave this issue resolved in order to improve the service.

Start at 0,05BTC increases in order of 0,005BTC

The domain is linked to a residual page at this time, and gets more than 300 unique visitors a day without content or promotions or backlinking, all traffic is organic by direct search.

It is ideal to make a listing of bitcoins operators and obtain ROI with affiliate programs, for tranding businesses with alt coins, etc.

Immediate offers are accepted.

Perfect!!

What solution can be taken regarding the high fees these days with transactions?

Currently the costs are tripling, and the users who enter deposit play a little and they are making a total withdrawal ... they destroy the benefits.

Currently we have taken the step of raising the fees of withdraw but I think that as they keep going up it will be nonsense.

You are right, however, many people protest in that sense  , I believe that 5 bits are enough to play at least times and determine and test the site.

Jackpot level The chances of obtaining the jackpot vary depending on the amount of the bet, with the following scheme
Bets 1 to 10 bits. 5% to win the Jackpot
Bets 25 to 250 bits. 10% to win the Jackpot.
Bets 500 to 5,000 bits. 15% to win the Jackpot.
Bets 10,000 to 50,000 bits. 25% to win the Jackpot.
Bet 100,000 bits. 50% to win the Jackpot

We are preparing the new version with great aesthetic and functional changes, the Provably FairPlay system and the Jackpot revision.

The revision of the Jackpot will consist of that once reached level 9, the level of the Jckpot, all the users already of 1 bit or of 10,000 will have a 50% chance of winning the JAckpot (they will choose between 2 squares), evidently the Jackpot will be lower, but that will allow the level of play to be fairer.

On the free bit delivery system, we are beginning to understand that we have to increase the delivery quantity and do it periodically. We are studying the model so as not to overload the level of "delivered bits" above the possible return.

Hello,
Although it is often difficult to recognize the mistakes that have been made, I admit that you are right. We will follow the advice and we will return with much more strength and put into practice parts of the development and design that we were working on and we have saved for the future.

Thank you very much for the advice and I am sorry for the inconvenience.

When you login as a user, the system assigns you 5 bits to play. But you can deposit more bits to increase the bets.

thx

Currently all bets are covered by a group of 50-55 (partners) high stacks players.
The coverage forecast is 385BTC in total and not 200BTC as you indicate.
Obviously, the BTC coverage accounts are not the accounts generated for the individual use of the users.
In any case we would be so stupid to ensure coverage that can not be met, it is neither the first project nor the last.
As I have indicated in the detail together with the Provably Fair development process, the details will be shown and the verifications can be made and of course, we will learn the option "not contemplated" previously to sign with an address with an adequate percentage of the amount