My position regarding 'Scharmbeck'. I used to work for the Worldcoin Foundation. 3 of the board members decided to develop Scharmbeck. I did not approve of the relationship regarding Scharmbeck and the Foundation. I found it 'unwholesome' - so i quit.
~~ Xodianbarr ~~
You said you quit because you found
"the relationship regarding Scharmbeck and the Foundation. I found it 'unwholesome' - so i quit." but infofront dug up your comments. I supposed you will reply that you found out about scambeck and wdc after you pumped them.
You just got busted for lying

.
BTW, doug gilmore, the lawyer that is part of the scambeck trio has taken his profile off the wdc foundation page. But don't worry doug, your info is preserved for prosperity. http://web.archive.org/web/20140207083324/http://worldcoinfoundation.org/index.php/en/about/board-members
<-- holy shit! you actually managed to report a FACT!Sorry explain to me what the lie was again? Did you even read my reply?? Infofronts clearly did considering he dropped the subject.
I said Scharmbeck was a good venture. It was actually my job to promote Worldcoin (which obviously includes new Worldcoin services). That was a long time before all this happened i might add. Show me where i said i approved of the relationship between Worldcoin foundation and Scharmbeck. Just to point out also (Not that you deserve it): this was BEFORE I quit. So It's about time you retract your SECOND bullshit statement - again. Is there actually ANYTHING you can get right? Sucks to be you. You accused me of something without proof. You're still disrespecting me. For the sake of it. What kind of person are you that burns people for the hell of it?
Classic case of a professional BSer. Just talk in circle hoping to muddle things up and hope people don't have time to pick up on the BS.
You said you "quit" when you found out about wdcf and scambeck. What was there to find out? scambeck was started by the very same people who appointed themselves as the principle members of the wdcf. This is not some hidden info, those guys used their positions with wdcf to promote scambeck, the info were clearly presented on their websites. Are you suggesting that you did not know about this connection when you first pumped them? OTOH, If you did know about this connection and you found it "unwholesome" and you did not approve of them, then why did you pump them? If you knew that they were "unwholesome" and still worked for them, that makes you (and sagefit) scammers.
The only way for you to get out of this stink that you created is for you to personally claim ignorance, and say that you were first unaware about the connection between scambeck and wdcf, this claim would make you the most ignorant person in the wdc universe.
BTW, for the record, you and sagefit did not "quit" scambeck, you two pumped them right to the time when the scam blew up, YOU were personally trashing people, on the trollbox, who tried to point out the problem with scambeck up until the scam blew up. The scam finally blew up when people did the dividends calculations to show that scambeck cooked the book (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=443111.0 ). Their internal partnership problem conveniently appeared when their scam got ousted. You conveniently distancing yourself by claiming that you are only trying to promote wdc. Your new spiel now is to promote yourself as trusted vanguard guardian of wdc.