Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 105 results by bj9k
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 01/09/2017, 14:25:49 UTC
Hey guys,

So what is the deal with the PAMM accounts. I had very little on BTC-E. Most of my funds were tied up in PAMM. Obviously gone for the moment.

Any infos?

Cheers

WW

BTC-e said in news 2: "Metatrader 4 White label and PAMM platforms were provided to us by Fxopen company. But after the charges were made by the US to our service they abrogated a treaty unilaterally."

So, BTC-e have used FXOpen's MT4 platform making FXOpen somehow responsible for money for BTC-e client's MT4 accounts. At the same time FXOpen was offering crypto trading themself but using BTC-e as liquidity provider making BTC-e responsible for money that FXOpen clients have sent to BTC-e exchange. But it all depends how contract BTC-e and FXOpen been made for this "symbiotic" relationship. Is BTC-e anonymous to FXOpen? I don't think so.

So WHO does not know anything about BTC-e? Only BTC-e clients! But why? Guess all remember that festivity party in front of MtGox building.

Also I haven't heard did FXOpen frozen or not BTC-e client's balances on their MT4 platform. If they haven't frozen BTC-e balances, why would BTC-e tokenize MT4 balances?!
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 31/08/2017, 16:25:56 UTC
They have setup http://btc-e.nz but not http://www.btc-e.nz (newbies usually do not know how to setup www. access to a domain but pros usually do that the first).

I have tried to login with invalid password and was refused to login it so seems that they have legit database. Possible problem is that who ever could get btc-e database does not have actual login passwords but just password hashes. So I will wait for more details before my first login.

Fegbox chatters at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fegbox confirmed that old 2FA works but that there are some issues with yahoo email accounts because btc-e require password change after first login with email confirmation and setting new 2FA.

UPDATE96025: USA IPs seems to have been blocked. Thats pretty mean to THEIR own US clients because US gov can access btc-e new site quite easily but regular average Joe that is having his own funds at btc-e can get just 0 bytes from btc-e.nz server. Couldn't they have setup separate page for US IPs? Or they just don't know how to set that up so they have just clicked on nice geo-blocking feature of cloudflare.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: FXOpen - increased marging req 5 times and fees 2 times
by
bj9k
on 23/08/2017, 14:46:54 UTC
It took couple of days for FXOpen to reply to my support ticket. Anyway, they have confirmed that increase of margin req is NOT valid for crypto trades.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: FXOpen - increased marging req 5 times and fees 2 times
by
bj9k
on 17/08/2017, 17:42:30 UTC
Update1:
- their live support said that 5 times margin req increase IS valid for crypto too
- their forum super moderator said that it is NOT valid for crypto but only for FX and CFDs
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 17/08/2017, 17:41:00 UTC
Bittrex is NOT regulated so it can be closed anytime.

Yesterday I have received fake Bittrex notification about my account to be frozen because of inactivity. After inspecting their link that link was actually for bittrex.CAM instead of .COM

But anyway I have never opened account on Bittrex anyway. Seems that this phishing issue is based on BTC-e stolen data couple of years ago.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 16/08/2017, 19:32:12 UTC
If there is one thing we all know is that socalism sucks diseased horse cock. Socialising funds is just as bad. FIat holder shouldnt be bailed out by  wise crypto holders

Crypto holders does not need to keep their crypto at an exchange.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
FXOpen - increased marging req 5 times and fees 2 times
by
bj9k
on 16/08/2017, 19:07:26 UTC
FXOpen posted this note couple of hours before august 17th:
-------------------------------------
Due to the growing political tension between North Korea and the USA, FXOpen may increase margin requirements up to 5 times their normal values without further notice starting with the market opening on August 17th, 2017. This may affect all traded financial instruments.

We are taking this measure to reduce your risk due to the potential high volatility, rapid price movements or market gaps that may occur in case of further political escalation. Please consider this information in your trading and ensure you have sufficient funds on your account to maintain your positions.

Best Regards,

FXOpen Trading Desk
https://www.fxopen.com/en/about-us/news/fxopen-increases-margin-by-5-times/
-------------------------------------
This margin requirement increase of 5 times means that instead of 1:3 leveraged trades, you will be allowed only 1:0.6 (leveraged? or what is called this?). I have asked their support is this true and they just said: "maybe" Cheesy I have also asked them to opt me out of that "risk protection" as they called.



Trading fees increase 2 times to 1% for full-turn:
-------------------------------------
Dear Clients,

Please, note that starting from September 1, 2017 the half-turn commission for crypto accounts will be 0.5% of the transaction volume.

Please, consider this information when planning your trading activities.
https://www.fxopen.com/en/about-us/news/changes-to-trading-commission-on-crypto-accounts/
-------------------------------------

Is this trading fee increase also to blame USA Korea political tensions?!
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 14/08/2017, 14:08:51 UTC
Guys don't forget BTC-e trollbox replacement chat at http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fegbox
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 14/08/2017, 13:50:49 UTC
BTC-e came to logical conclusion making fiat and crypto equal in their books.

When this situation with BTC-e started, CoinDesk haven't published any news for days. But today when this simple update6 appeared, CoinDesk published an article within 3 hours.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 11/08/2017, 00:14:45 UTC
I almost forgot about BTC-e Cheesy

So what you guys think who's going to be new mysterious investor: xbtce, fxopen, exmo or ________ ?
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 04/08/2017, 19:37:20 UTC
This doesn't make any sense. If they were using btce for their liquidity and to execute orders, didn't they just lose all their btc/usd?

Definitely (at least pending any refund from BTC-e). I imagine the same goes for many legitimate brokers like FXOpen, AvaTrade, Plus500 and others who were using the exchange for liquidity. The ties between BTC-e and xBTCe go deeper, though, and this is more about distancing themselves...

Not necessarily. Maybe they owned to BTC-e. It all depends on total trading gains, losses, deposits, positions, margins......... And since all those brokers are high profile with over 100b$ in monthly trades don't be surprised if they had an agreement with BTC-e that included bank escrow account for situation that actually had happen.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 03/08/2017, 23:57:39 UTC
You can't convert crypto into fiat. You can trade one for the other with someone but you cant convert them, it's not alchemy, it's just a change of ownership. Exchanges like BTC-e have bank accounts which people transfer by wire and other means funds into to purchase BTC-e "casino tokens" called USD/RUR/EUR which they can gamble and trade with other BTC-e users for fiat or crypto tokens. The bank account balance doesn't change for those trades, it only changes when people cash out their tokens or make a new deposit, or when BTC-e take their fees out, so the balance should be high unless seized. Same goes for their crypto wallets.

Unless an exchange is trading their bank account fiat and crypto coins on some other exchange.

Also it is impossible to know have people deposited more fiat then it was withdrawn or vice versa. Exchange running out of one currency is possible.

Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 03/08/2017, 23:51:16 UTC
Opposite to what? When you deposit into an exchange you are not given fiat value into your exchange balance, but you are given only RIGHTS to trade onto their exchange with their offered value of your deposited asset.

You have to consider that, like crypto hot wallets, an exchange also have "fiat hot wallets" to address user fiat conversion requests on daily basis.
This means that part of the crypto coins must have been converted in to FIAT before the takedown. To allow users to withdraw if requested.
Exchanges usually convert a percentage of users' coins daily to feed FIAT hot and cold wallets.
Therefore, since the "FIAT hot and cold wallet" are presumably lost, a complete refund of all the assets is quite difficult, especially on the FIAT side.

But hey, I hope I'm wrong Smiley

You are right but those fiat hot wallets are insignificant to total value. Mayzus is not a bank so they have forwarded all deposits to BTC-e bank account. So only non settled withdrawal and deposit transactions are lost. There could also be situations when an exchange is completely out of required withdrawal hard currency and then they need to get or to borrow it from another source. But an exchange is not into obligation to keep exact amount of each currency as their client's exchange balances are.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 03/08/2017, 23:08:54 UTC
Most guys never read previus posts.

Your exchange balance is not influencing exchange bank accounts the moment when you trade.

It is just a number with some value. You own cash or crypto only after withdrawal.


So this would mean that it should not matter if you were in btc / ltc / eth / fiat or whatever else, all users should be reimbursed no matter what.

Quite the opposite Smiley


Opposite to what? When you deposit into an exchange you are not given fiat value into your exchange balance, but you are given only RIGHTS to trade onto their exchange with their offered value of your deposited asset.

End of day bank settlement, total bank accounts valuation and currency requirements does not have anything to do with actual currencies that are onto exchange/bank client's accounts. Just total value of all assets with total value of all client accounts.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 03/08/2017, 22:51:40 UTC
Most guys never read previus posts.

Your exchange balance is not influencing exchange bank accounts the moment when you trade.

It is just a number with some value. You own cash or crypto only after withdrawal.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 03/08/2017, 21:46:29 UTC
For someone that had 6 figures in fiat when the site went down the second statement doesn't sound great, but I'm hoping everyone will be reimbursed no matter if you were in btc or fiat.
US citizens as well as EU citizens can crowdfund for lawyer and return their money in court, i think

It does not matter what was your exchange balance. Probably half of users were into fiat. Having fiat balance onto exchange does not mean that you have a share of their fiat bank account as that does not increase or decrease their bank fiat balance. Exchange balance is just a number, not hard cash. No matter if your exchange balance is fiat or crypto, you actually never own coins or fiat until you request withdrawal.

The main issue is with leveraged MT4 positions. Will those positions be liquidated when trade was stopped or left to be auto margin called if trade resumes?
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 03/08/2017, 21:41:34 UTC
https://etherscan.io/address/0x8eb3fa7907ad2ef4c7e3ba4b1d2f2aac6f4b5ae6

500 ETH went out, 10 mins after Update4. It's a sign, like that input of 54.635 ETH approx 10.000$ 4 days ago.
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 02/08/2017, 20:41:00 UTC
polo down ooooo no

During Vinnik's arrest FBI got infected by some trojan virus from his smartphone and that virus is now targeting major US infrastructure...... or maybe just Comcast US internet provider is down and that's causing the issue Cheesy

https://twitter.com/Poloniex
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 02/08/2017, 15:37:54 UTC
I am not kidding, we must go there physically. We are thousands and they are just a few, so what's the matter?

The reason they fool us and rob us is because we don't react, don't you realize?

If someone gives you a punch and you don't react he will get confident and keep beating you harder.

By the way what are the real names of btc-e operators?

To go to which address? What names? Everything is hidden from the public.

Maybe in Russia maybe in Panama...... Mayzus? Well he knows exactly to whom his companies were sending all fiat deposits but he is probably tied to legal contracts not to discuss that in public. But they all know (Mayzus, Deutche Bank, Cloudflare, Equinix datacenter.........) but not us, actual owners the most of BTC-e's fiat and coins.


That's a good start.
They were Cloudflare's customers right? And Cloudflare knows their identity.
If we are 10000 angry people and we go together to Cloudflare or Equinix office they must give us the names we want.

It is always better to go through by legal representative like that lawyer who is offering a free service for BTC-e clients. Otherwise you can only do this:

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/assets/4023651/DSCF4053.jpg
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: BTC-e hacked ??
by
bj9k
on 02/08/2017, 14:04:19 UTC
Are you guys still believe in santa? We will not get any refund from Btc-e nor US government . US government always interpret their own laws depending on their own interests and Btc-e owners right now are covering the tracks so they can run away with remaining funds, or they will offer the funds to fbi to avoid getting in jail.

As I said before we need a new coin where, in situations like this, users can vote and in case of a majority will freeze the stolen coins until the exchange or authorities can prove which coins are dirty and which are legit.
Somebody said that will be the end of crypto.I don't think so.Look at ethereum, they did roll back and the price and popularity compared to 2016 is huge. There are thousands of coins nobody is using so another useless coin will not be the end of crypto.

I'm a trader not a programmer, but if somebody will make a coin that:
  • is based on some type of pos algorithm where stake will be very small 1coin or something very small to ensure everyone can take part
  • generated coins will be awarded to a random peer(s) or some algo to ensure fair coin distribution
  • a simple voting system so the community will decide in case like gox, btc-e or major software changes

If something like this is technically possible then I will be happy to make a donation to help development.

That idea is interesting because owners of that coin could also act in a situation of 51% pool attack, at least by stopping everything until owners and miners could reach an agreement how to proceed.

Let say that in dubious situations 25% of coin owners could initiate voting to stop all transactions and if more then 50% of owners vote for that then all transactions could be stopped making owners and miners eager to find resolution asap or miners could fork that chain Wink