If that's the issue, maybe I can shed some light, but it depends on what period of time.  I was a fairly early XMR miner (first half of May - before the Lucas and then Wolf optimized miners, and before pools for a tiny bit).  And I had a decent but not unreasonably high percentage of the hashrate for a while.  If the concern is about the first couple weeks then I can't help.

If people can't see what's going on by now...

Your answer is non-responsive.  If you had made your request publicly, it would be trivial to find it.

But you referenced your purported PM publicly, and as I said, you failed to identify what the request was, who it was directed to, and who ignored it.

And you refuse to do so.  Why?

He'll never directly answer questions like this, because he has no real answer.  His vague post just earlier is a perfect example.  He mentioned a request that he made that was ignored.  He failed to identify what the request was, who it was directed to, and who ignored it.  And guess what, he won't do it.  

As I've said before, I have no idea whether he can or will launch any sort of attack (or whether there is one in progress).  But I can tell you that his threats, all of them, are vague.  And he either ignores serious questions, or addresses them in a non-responsive way.  My hunch is that this is deliberate ... it gives him an out.  Whatever happens, or doesn't happen, he can use utilize the fact that he hasn't really threatened anything, or requested anything, or said anything, as cover.  He'll point to X, Y, or Z prior statement of his, and claim that he was being consistent all along, and that everyone else was too stupid to understand.  

And he's right about one thing, he shouldn't be banned, and won't be banned for any of this.  No one has to listen to him.  No one.  

I've said this before as well, but if he does know of an exploit, I am quite certain that the devs would love to hear from him, and work with him to see if it can be resolved.  Assuming he knows something, and that is a huge assumption at this point, he's acted very irresponsibly so far.  And if he does something criminal, he will, with near-certainty, face consequences.

Finally, he's lost any moral high ground he may have had.  Arguably, his obsession with AUR, whether or not he was behind the TW attack, was justified based on the fact that AUR had all the hallmarks of a scam.  That justification is absent with XMR.  

We'll find out soon enough, but if I were a betting man, and I certainly am a speculator on XMR if that counts, I would be (and am) betting against BCX launching any sort of serious attack on XMR.

And since he likes to set up puzzles and make you read into what he says rather than ever give a direct answer, I'd look closely at his other recent post, where he admitted that there is some "bull shit," and referred to his own actions as something that may or may not happen.  Like everything else he says, this is open to a myriad of interpretations.  But if there is no attack, or there is a minor, non-coin killing attack, he'll need some kind of out in order to save face and reputation, and if you look at his posts carefully, it's all set up pretty nicely.

That one goes here.

Oh, then you're just wrong.  Or deliberately vague.  Which one this time?

Sometimes you have to edit what this clown writes, I gave it a shot.  Either he has problems thinking things through first, or he's deliberately vague to appear more intelligent (as in he tricked you).  Either can explain why he always seems to need to point out an alternate way to interpret something he wrote before.  

We welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace. There is one sign that we can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace. Believers in this radically new form of currency, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the world, if you seek liberalization, come here to Bitstamp. Wire in your fiat and TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!

There's other in the top 20 of marketcap (XC, BTCD) that claim anonymity ... I have no idea whether their claims have any merit.

And if no one would want to mine the unblacklisted coins, wouldn't pools emerge that don't enforce the blacklist, either because they are in a jurisdiction that doesn't force them to, or they can otherwise evade any requirement to blacklist?  It seems like a ban on anonymity would have to be more than just a blacklist if that's the case.

But thanks to both of you, reading this (though not fully understanding the concepts but getting closer every day), as well as other very thoughtful discussions about CN in other XMR threads is the main reason I'm speculating on XMR.  I (and I hope most others) condemn BCX's childish, terroristic threats - there was a better way to spark this debate than to give an arbitrary deadline - but I am glad it is happening nonetheless.  There are very few XMR transactions now, I hope and expect that to change in the coming months and years, but I'm encouraged to see such foresight.  

I do think that the possibility that states will crack down on anonymity (banning exchange to fiat, criminalizing use, I could go on..) is the greatest threat to XMR's viability.  But it is a remote one

DDoS is an aggressive act against another's property.  How does the fact that its within the protocol of the internet change that?

People move...

No responsible person is going to release his identity, because someone might do something stupid.  And he's done a reasonable job obfuscating it.

You have a horrible habit of misconstruing facts.  It's been said many times before ... if you know of an exploit, the developers want your assistance.

Stop being a fucking child.

What story?

Giving you the benefit of the doubt that this wasn't a veiled threat, talk like this is still inappropriate.  No one should get hurt, period.  Perhaps authorities can be alerted if appropriate, depending on whether he actually carries out an attack and how it is done.  It doesn't seem like he's gone through great length to hide his identity given a cursory review of his posting history, though it is at least obfuscated.  I doubt he'd break the law - it would be foolish to do so.  The industry has matured considerably in the past months, and crimes that would have gone unnoticed end in arrests and prison time.  So if there is an exploit, I doubt he would do anything illegal to accomplish it, like steal.

I disagree.  But that is why I called it speculating before.  I think we can both agree that Monero has a fairly low chance of becoming very valuable in the future.  I just happen to think the chance is much higher than the market price implies.  

Obviously people do not always see eye to eye on things.  But making childish, terroristic threats at sabotage is never acceptable.  No one benefits.  

I was listening to Everlast when I picked a nickname on Polo.  I'm neither black, nor am I Jesus.  It happened to be the song I was listening to at the time.

At any rate, it should be taken seriously.  BCX is needlessly causing harm.  He is able to do so because of the attack on AUR.  With AUR, there was a strong argument that the coin was a scam.  Monero is different.  He's said so himself.  Yet he is causing discord because he is pissed at what a few people in these forums have said about him.  For all he knows, some of them could be provoking him hoping that he will execute an attack, which will send speculators away from XMR and toward their own coin.  At the end of the day, he is harming people who have done nothing to him.  And he is harming a project that could be a pretty good thing.  There is no rational excuse for his behavior that I've seen.  I invite him to prove me wrong.

Again I'm being accused of being someone else.  I'm not.  I can't really prove it to you, but I'm sure some people recognize me from the Poloniex trollbox.  I'm not going to address this again, ya'll can believe what you want.  

I have no idea whether BCX can launch any attack on XMR, like the one he is describing, or something else.  I can tell you that his behavior is childish and irrational, at least from what I've seen.  Let's be adults here.  It isn't that hard, I promise.  

Have they ever refused your assistance?  I'm serious.  I'd like to know, please show some examples.  

I'm confident that if you had unique knowledge of something that could harm XMR, the devs would invite you to assist them to see if it could be fixed.  

I might be wrong, but if not you'll need to come up with a better excuse.

Or maybe, just maybe, do the right thing.

Unless it's all just BS because you have nothing better to do.  If so, again, I'm sorry.